Seriously, how sad and pathetic is your life if you buy and play a game just to spite some people on the internet? Or, to turn things around, if some random guy on the internet buying a game "to spite you" actually bothers you? This is some pitiably childish stuff. And that's from a guy who still watches every new Scooby Doo movie.

Social Justice Warriors

Thanks.... I think I like sexy jealous wives better...

Nothing, but the sexy wives probably have better legs.

I don't buy thigs just to spite others. As I mentioned before, that is just a pleasant byproduct. And I find it sad and patethic that you spend your time and effort to insult others on a web forum as if that would make you superior or somehing.

Well, something has to be. Same thing with "do-gooders", or "third-worldists", or "tree-huggers", etc. Any racist, sexist, homophobic, or generally reactionary form of contemporary caveman has to find a word to qualify and dismiss those who mock him, and it's not easy to come up with something that doesn't stress his own incriminated backwardness. Hence, the resorting to something that, well, actually, does.

Shut up, you..... uhh.. meddling kid.

Yeah, I don't buy thigs either. :P

Don't be ridiulous. Of course it does not. I never insinuated anything of the sort. It's the part where I don't consider spiting some guys I don't even know and could simply ignore by doing something they will ignore if they only have half a working braincell to be pleasent that makes me superior.

Making fun of someone because he failed to spell a few English words properly even though he is obviously a native Spanish speaker... How juvenile...

Well, now that this thread has hit rock bottom (and who would've guessed THAT given the subject... AMIRITE?)...

maybe it's time to move on to better threads and see if we can bring those down too...

I've just realized that the most serendipitous opportunity if you want to give a lift to the nuts of someone using the phrase SJW is to do it while they're busy reading the WSJ. ;)

Also, no, it's not wrong.

Anyone reading the WSJ could use a good lift of the nuts whether or not they use the phrase, so kick away I say.

So everyone who uses the term "SJW" when talking about social justice warriors is a racist, sexist or homophobic "caveman"? Like using those three letters in a sentence is no different than taking off a hat and revealing the word "SLAVER" tattooed on your forehead in the Fallout universe? Come on. You are better than this. I'm sure half the people who use the term "SJW" use it because it's more convenient than writing "people who are interested in what they think is social justice".

Holy shit. When did this community turn into the Tumblr community and how did it happen?

Good question.