It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Grargar: If you preordered the game from the developer's website, you would be able to play it 3 days earlier than its release date.
avatar
cal74: From the few reviews I read, it means that you would be fed up with the game even before it's out on Steam... That's a good idea for an achievement :)
See that avatar everyone? See it!?
That is a game which deals with slavery, alcoholism, torture, and severe surgical deformity, not to mention ridicule of the blind and clumsy, and yet GOG carries it. Why? Because it's a GREAT GAME! :D Enough of this, 'they don't have Hatred because they are afraid of it' BS. :P They just don't want to sell unadulterated crap. :D
low rated
Come to think of it. Considering the possibility of SJWs or other form of peer pressure being the cause for GOG to refuse to sell Hatred (The version given by DC was that GOG told them the game was good, but they "Can't sell it", which means there is another reason), GOG is the victim, it could be held at gunpoint by some messed up game dev telling them if they sell Hatred the dev will pull its game from GOG's catalog (I would not be surprised if Phill Fish is tied to this) or it could be even many devs or SJWs using threats against GOG to force them into not releasing Hatred. If that is the case, which does not seem that far fetched considering how the likes of Fish behave, GOG is a sort of hostage, a victim held by gunpoint by a third party which gets in the way. If that is the case, both GOG and DC need a good lawyer to fix this. And if that turns out to be the case I will not rest until the third party gets punished for obstructing the free market. I am even willing to donate money to finance a lawyer for GOG and DC if they need it.
Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
Next one to use the term AND furthers the corresponding conspiracy/influence nonsense gets a good ol' crusade to boot.
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
How do you get a jihad? Like... in box? Or a flower pot? Can I grow it? Can I have more than one, like a whole collection?
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
avatar
Breja: How do you get a jihad? Like... in box? Or a flower pot? Can I grow it? Can I have more than one, like a whole collection?
I don't know, but it sounded better than 'ass whipping' especially considering the fact that I can't fight for shit. I was shadow boxing yesterday and I lost.
avatar
Breja: How do you get a jihad? Like... in box? Or a flower pot? Can I grow it? Can I have more than one, like a whole collection?
avatar
tinyE: I don't know, but it sounded better than 'ass whipping' especially considering the fact that I can't fight for shit. I was shadow boxing yesterday and I lost.
We could always try the fish-slapping dance. Or insult swordfighting.
Post edited June 01, 2015 by Breja
avatar
tinyE: I don't know, but it sounded better than 'ass whipping' especially considering the fact that I can't fight for shit. I was shadow boxing yesterday and I lost.
avatar
Breja: We could always try the fish-slapping dance. Or insult swordfighting.
Both marvellous suggestions!
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
Hey I don't have a better nominal term to use for those moralist corrupt wankers. Do you have any?
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Hey I don't have a better nominal term to use for those moralist corrupt wankers. Do you have any?
Yeah, it's called not labeling people to begin with.
low rated
Geez, how many secondary terms would you need for a single fictional enemy concept?
Post edited June 01, 2015 by Vainamoinen
Its just an updated version of the very first GTA game and Postal 1.

TotalBiscuit on youtube gave an accurate review of this game.

This game was hyped up for no reason.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Hey I don't have a better nominal term to use for those moralist corrupt wankers. Do you have any?
avatar
tinyE: Yeah, it's called not labeling people to begin with.
Well, sorry but I am human, and my nominal instinc tells me to label people be it for good or bad. It is human nature, if you want to get rid of it then you are wasting your time.
avatar
tinyE: Next person to use the term SJW gets a jihad.
SJW /trollface.
avatar
Vainamoinen: Geez, how many secondary terms would you need for a single fictional enemy concept?
Except that it does exist. It is not a fictional enemy concept. It is at least more real than the patriarchy. But I am not going to argue about feminist theory nonsense in a gaming forum.