you don't need proof to figure this out you just have to have a working brain and a non biased nature to clearly view the situation from a non gog's fun perspective, and what good will the proof do since even with the witcher 3 downgrade proof people were still defending gog?
I don't give 2 f*cks about gog not wanting to host the game here, obviously I can get it from steam what I don't get though is why you people are still defending these lying hypocrites(gog)

You're still in this discussion, repeating over and over and over that GOG doesn't host Hatred because they're lying hypocrytes. Clearly you don't give a fuck :-P

I doubt any of the Polish developers of Hatred wrote articles and blog posts about Hatred.

I like how people refuse to even conceive of the notion that it was rejected due to not being very good.

stop nitpicking my post already its getting old, this is what I stated.
I don't give 2 f*cks about gog not wanting to host the game here, obviously I can get it from steam what I don't get though is why you people are still defending these lying hypocrites(gog)
If you guys would stop acting like naïve children that believes gog is a good parent that doesn't falter, I wouldnt be in this discussion

National Alliance should subject "Ethnic Cleansing" to gOg. If it is rejected, it would only be because censorship. or the femnazis... probably censorship by the femnazis in plotting with SJW's thinking with their feelings.

I like how you cant conceive of the notion that there are way more worse games here than hatred(gameplay wise)

You can say 'fuck' in here.

But can you 'fuck' in here?

That is some fucking bullshit, everyone knows you can't say that.

Also, them putting asterisks in is funnier. ;)

Of course I can (Bloodnet)

Most of them have historical importance or belong to a series with fantastic entries.

Oh dear gods...you said femnazis and I immediately thought of Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS. -laughing hard-

Sorry.

You're still in this discussion, repeating over and over and over that GOG doesn't host Hatred because they're lying hypocrytes. Clearly you don't give a fuck :-P

For crying out loud, we've been trough this discussion already. Hatred devs wanted to raise controversy. Do you want me to start sending links again or did you notice them first time around? That those article and blog writers were so happy to jump on the controversy and reinforce it is another matter entirely, but from the sounds of it, it's precisely what devs wanted to happen in the first place - and it turned out to be a very efficient strategy, because here we are, having people like Supremtin calling GOG "Lying hypocrites" for not wanting to sell it. Basically, when I want SJWs fighting for my game, all I need to do is to raise controversy and if I manage to raise enough ruckus, I will have manipulated people into fighting me without them actually stopping and thinking for themselves - which I find sort of sad, actually.

With proof people defending Witcher 3 look bad.

Without proof people attacking Witcher 3 look bad.

Same thing with hatred.

Also my brain cannot fanthom why GoG hate money, since more games means more sales. And rejecting games out of spite will sour their reputation with devs. So without proof I do not believe GoG can overcome their greed for money just to spite Hatrad.