It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
zeogold: You survived Reagan and Bush, I'm sure another Republican president, if he is elected, won't kill you.
Actually, many people didn't. For example, Reagan did not address the AIDS crisis, and a lot of people (particularly gay men) died as a result.

Under W. Bush (remember, there have been 2 different Bush presidents), many people were sent to war and killed as a result.

So many people did not survive Reagan and Bush. (Saying that a particular user here survived them feels inadequate for much the reason that the anthropic principle in astronomy (that we are on a planet that can support life because we wouldn't be around to say we're not if we were not) feels inadequate.)

avatar
Klumpen0815: And here's something for the absurdism corner:
https://www.humblebundle.com/store/mrpresident
Unfortunately, the game there appears to be DRM-encumbered, and therefore I can't ethically support it. (I consider DRM to be immoral.)

I believe GOG actually did get a game about elections recently.
Post edited November 11, 2016 by dtgreene
low rated
avatar
TStael: I think you got it wrong.

If our charming micktiegs_8 told me he would smash my face in, cause I have this or that failing in his/her eyes, I would not mind too much.

He/she said:

"I never intend to speak ill of those who are developmentally challenged etc. Trust me, I feel like smashing someone's face in when they use that 'autistic' bullshit."

I just reported that. I think it is so unkind. Do you ever read Independent? Did you read about the Amercian woman whom graffitie'd her own garace door, because she has an adult child that has to wear nappies? And the police came in not realizing an adult male in nappies needs gentle approch?

Not possibly smashing that face in - or?

I don't want such things said here - we can say a lot of things, we don't have to be cruel exactly.
avatar
micktiegs_8: I really hope what you've read was just lost in translation... because you've got it absolutely wrong.
Please do not try to converse if you're bent on skewing statements or taking them the wrong way.
edit: reported what I said? Fuck let me make it clear that even a fish could understand it - I hate when OTHER PEOPLE USE THE WORD AUTISTIC FOR BULLYING PURPOSES.... so much so that I want to smash their face in. You're twisting shit the wrong fucking way around as usual.
No, I don't think so - unless it is the moron thing.

You said, word for word:

"I never intend to speak ill of those who are developmentally challenged etc. Trust me, I feel like smashing someone's face in when they use that 'autistic' bullshit."


If you told me you'd like my face smashed in, I'd not mind that much - but you seem to assume that you can diagnose autism sufferes more truly, or critically - than actual health care professionals. On those others with "bullshit" will get their faces "smashed in".

Don't worry - I don't think gog minds the likes of you, unfortunately.

But really - your concern should be with empathy - and not wanting to smash anyone's face in! I suspect those parents would grab a "naughty but normal" child, should they have the choice.

You imply disabled children are just naughty - when presumably you are in full control of your faculties, but choose to use them to be petty and unkind.
avatar
micktiegs_8: I really hope what you've read was just lost in translation... because you've got it absolutely wrong.
Please do not try to converse if you're bent on skewing statements or taking them the wrong way.
edit: reported what I said? Fuck let me make it clear that even a fish could understand it - I hate when OTHER PEOPLE USE THE WORD AUTISTIC FOR BULLYING PURPOSES.... so much so that I want to smash their face in. You're twisting shit the wrong fucking way around as usual.
avatar
TStael: No, I don't think so - unless it is the moron thing.

You said, word for word:

"I never intend to speak ill of those who are developmentally challenged etc. Trust me, I feel like smashing someone's face in when they use that 'autistic' bullshit."

If you told me you'd like my face smashed in, I'd not mind that much - but you seem to assume that you can diagnose autism sufferes more truly, or critically - than actual health care professionals. On those others with "bullshit" will get their faces "smashed in".

Don't worry - I don't think gog minds the likes of you, unfortunately.

But really - your concern should be with empathy - and not wanting to smash anyone's face in! I suspect those parents would grab a "naughty but normal" child, should they have the choice.

You imply disabled children are just naughty - when presumably you are in full control of your faculties, but choose to use them to be petty and unkind.
OK great I don't need this. You really should evaluate your English comprehension... this is ridiculous. Cheers and have a good one.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: You women ought to go on strike and stop creating until men learn how to be less destructive.
avatar
micktiegs_8: This person is a headache... I... I can't even begin to imagine how many thought processes are going through their head. Look at their response to you. What does that even mean?! No wonder I'm becoming an alcoholic.
Everything on interwebz should be taken with a large grain of salt. Just to be safe. ;p

avatar
TStael: No, I don't think so - unless it is the moron thing.

You said, word for word:

"I never intend to speak ill of those who are developmentally challenged etc. Trust me, I feel like smashing someone's face in when they use that 'autistic' bullshit."

If you told me you'd like my face smashed in, I'd not mind that much - but you seem to assume that you can diagnose autism sufferes more truly, or critically - than actual health care professionals. On those others with "bullshit" will get their faces "smashed in".

Don't worry - I don't think gog minds the likes of you, unfortunately.

But really - your concern should be with empathy - and not wanting to smash anyone's face in! I suspect those parents would grab a "naughty but normal" child, should they have the choice.

You imply disabled children are just naughty - when presumably you are in full control of your faculties, but choose to use them to be petty and unkind.
avatar
micktiegs_8: OK great I don't need this. You really should evaluate your English comprehension... this is ridiculous. Cheers and have a good one.
Actually, what you said could be interpreted that way. She thinks you're implying that autism is a bullshit diagnosis.
Post edited November 11, 2016 by richlind33
low rated
Trump is a stepping stone towards a new Hitler. I couldn't be happier. The Alt-Right will only continue to get stronger.
avatar
richlind33: Actually, what you said could be interpreted that way. She thinks you're implying that autism is a bullshit diagnosis.
A much more sane/civil GOGer would probably ask for a clearer statement IF they interpreted it that way; whereas, this 'person' doesn't possess the ability to reason with another, and instead throws out wild assumptions that could fill a page from a simple line of text they read.

There is just something very off about how they interpret ANY information presented to them, and it's uncomfortably confronting.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Actually, what you said could be interpreted that way. She thinks you're implying that autism is a bullshit diagnosis.
avatar
micktiegs_8: A much more sane/civil GOGer would probably ask for a clearer statement IF they interpreted it that way; whereas, this 'person' doesn't possess the ability to reason with another, and instead throws out wild assumptions that could fill a page from a simple line of text they read.

There is just something very off about how they interpret ANY information presented to them, and it's uncomfortably confronting.
I think she means well, but her command of English could certainly be much better.
I can't watch it because it's not appropriate enough for me :p

Being a liberal or conservative are not synonymous with violence / being progressive or not! Why can't people put their heads out of the sand and understand what those words really means.
avatar
Aleenik: Trump is a stepping stone towards a new Hitler. I couldn't be happier. The Alt-Right will only continue to get stronger.
i watched some videos and the majority of the protesters wrecking havoc were very young, my guess 99% of these were the left voters, ( the hilly and 3rd party ones) seems that left is a lot more dangerous then right.

Good thing is i stopped voting years ago... cause there is nothing i can vote for it is all garbage.
As for EU .... these selfelected people have been treating all Europeans like children, time for them to wake up and notice that it is the people who choose the govts, not the old dinosaurs in Brussels :D

It is time to wake up for many govts, cause in the past decades nothing has changed, no progress, we only went backwards, waste of money and time.

People choose a govt, not the other way around: govt dont choose their people to govern.
avatar
jamotide: Not true. If Trump wants to bomb somebody, the democrats will maybe not let him get away with it because hes Trump. If Clinton wants to, and we know she wants to from the past 4 years, then the Reps will be with it cause they love bombs.
avatar
SirPrimalform: I'm sorry, but I still disagree. Trump being in power is scary, the fact that people wanted to put him there is scarier still considering what we already know about him. It's not about what Trump might do, it's what it says about America that they are ok with putting him there.
No scarier than Clinton. Don't let yourself get manipulated by the media hype. Trump is just another status quo candidate like Obummer. And they both love Hillary, Trump praised her alot in the last elections.
avatar
sanscript: I can't watch it because it's not appropriate enough for me :p

Being a liberal or conservative are not synonymous with violence / being progressive or not! Why can't people put their heads out of the sand and understand what those words really means.
The same way like feminism, when too many people does hateful things in the name of liberal / conservative. And other so call "Liberal" / "Conservative" does not police themselves, but tried to defend the wrong doers, deflect the blame, point something about the "other side" they think is worse, ignore all the flaws because someone is on their side. Nobody trust the original meaning of Liberal / Conservative then.

Their original meaning does not matter, it means what it is now.

Vegetarian will mean meat eater if too many people identify as a vegetarian but eat meat, and other so call "Vegetarian" does not denounce them but defended them, make excuse, deflect, and point at something else to deflect attention, or stay silent.
Post edited November 11, 2016 by Gnostic
low rated
avatar
Vainamoinen: Oh come on. You know that would be a really bad idea. He'd be a martyr! Try to prove that he raped a 13 year old girl instead, maybe he'd kill himself.
avatar
tinyE: He more or less admitted to that kind of behavior already, and he got elected.
In other words, he never admitted to doing that. That was based upon selective context of a tape of him talking with who he thought was a friend and he was talking about groupies meaning women that consent to sexual activities with him.

Also, the accuser dropped the accusation and has ties with the Clinton crime family. Nice try but all your doing is crying and your tears taste so wonderful.

My mouth has an everlasting orgasm.
Attachments:
low rated
All the whiny leftist motherfu&&ers need to go play with play-doh.
Sea levels rising.
low rated
avatar
infinite9: My mouth has an everlasting orgasm.
Your brain, however, has spongiform encephalopathy.