Don't know this militant you speak of, and I honestly don't care.

I was basically referring to that many people are reacting with f.ex. hostility just because someone uses a world, without considering the whole picture the other person was trying to communicate. The connotation of worlds themselves has only a meaning when we subjectively put then in a context based on our own experience or conceptions. Just hours ago someone got cough up in the word "liberal"... and it was the downfall of everything, when I mentioned Kennedy.

Some doesn't like the word "globalization" either and reacts to it like it's the enemy :)

Besides, it's about semantics; some say new world order, some say globalization, and some say it's a winged "American Dad".

Control and propaganda comes in many forms and sizes. Sadly, once in a while there comes a person and twist things around. But he apparently does have one thing partially right - human culture do seem to repeat in cycles, like a sinus wave: Stable and prosperity v Unstable and violent. Middle east has fewer years before the next big phase.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw2WMu8WIAAP9Db.jpg

To all who wonder who voted for Trump?

Actually, when comparing to Mao Zedong and Pol Pot, he was even more paranoid, crazy and horrible than Hitler. The staggering but grotesque number of their own people is beyond words...

Fair enough, of course keep in mind I'm only saying that about a Trump-Sanders contest. Bernie embodies so many of the things that people *feel* like they're gonna get from Trump - i.e. improved economic outlook and standard of living for middle-working class types, not being constrained by party leadership, etc. But without all the nasty baggage. I know a good few people in my area here who either did like, or would have liked the Sanders message, and who think they are getting the same thing from Trump. Yet still they hold their noses while voting for him over that "baggage". Give them the "best of both worlds" candidate and it seems most would have been on board. And a small margin peeled away from Trump's totals from last night, and shifted to the Dem candidate, would have been enough to change the outcome.

Well on the "free college" idea, that's one of those things where I feel the good far outweighs the bad. Sure there will definitely be some, umm... inefficiencies.... and I remember (fondly? hah...) my college days also (Gen Xer here too). But to have an overall far better-educated public? Hah, you know what, I think if we had that we wouldn't have a President Trump today. Personally I think the positives are so great there (all around, not just in political sense), that I'd put up with a small amount of people gaming the system as a trade-off.

Agreed 100% here, that is certainly the biggest take-away from this election.

i love jews. i guess i would love a NWO where everything is actually in order, according to plan, and not wildly fucked up in every way.

Because in this case we do have the whole picture. We've been reading Kingsbradley's drivel for ages, on the GOG forums. Each piece of the puzzle that give its meaning to the next piece is already there.

other than defending conspiracy theories, he did say he hates both marxists and the "free" market globalists, which kinda makes him a moderate right?

Because GOG matters?

This is video game forum genius LOL

i like the greek guy's taste in games. i don't know about having sex with married women though.

That seems like a self-evident truth, yes.

And there we have it, even now, while the dust is still settling. The unwarranted, high horse-riding arrogance that so disgusted the people you sneer at and foisted a siege mentality upon them. Looks like your only takeaway from this election is the one that keeps your worldview and narrative safe ("people that voted for the candidate I don't like are morons!"), and you learned nothing from it. Somehow, I'm sure they didn't seem "imbecilic" to you when Obama was elected. The select few? Like that venal sellout who sold his soul to the devil and hanged his people out to dry? Willing to take in is more like it - meaning a cushy sinecure and a pat on the bald pate. ...but plus the side helping of starry-eyed idealism, terrible presence and absolutely zero cred as an accomplisher of things. And, after almost two years, you insist on doubling down on these baseless notions and refuse to learn from reality. More unwarranted arrogance and dunning-krugeresque estimation of the capabilities of a man who singlehandedly upended an ossified electoral process, fought and fended off his own party, the national and international media and the unrelenting, no holds-barred smearing psyops of the entire establishment for a year and a half. But yeah, he's an inexperienced, zero-intelligence buffoon. Makes sense. It has to, otherwise there goes your narrative, right? No, they think "pusillanimous sellout" and "walking pipedream that talked the talk but couldn't walk the walk". The only ass he would have handed Trump would have been the DNC's donkey for him to whip as if it owed him money. Much like Hillary did. That's a rather short-sighted, tendentious analysis of this gruelling, historic election. But whatever helps you sleep at night, I suppose. Sure. It had nothing to do with her track record and what she actually did do. Partisan dishonesty helps no-one, least of all yourself. That's fair. Are you prepared to acknowledge that the same applies to the manifold baseless canards, misrepresentations and outright lies Trump was pelted with throughout the campaign?

Elaborate on the psyops thingy. It sounds really koolaid and dark-future-like.

So, you would consider sanctions against USA for fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Libya, Syria......right?

You
You motherfifer
I oughta give you a fucking beer
That was righteous as a thunderstorm smithin' the tyrants of our age


Here, I am just glad he is in power, makes my job easier to get into the country since we cannot support our family anymore here and we want to get the VISAs