It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
jamotide: Why, there's not much difference between these two right wingers. But Trump will be way more amusing, so I think they made the right choice! Just like the Bushman was way funnier than Oh bummer. (except for the punability of the name)
avatar
SirPrimalform: Trump would be hilarious if he wasn't a real person. As bad as Clinton is she was by far the lesser of two evils. It's just a shame the Democrats chose such an awful candidate.
She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.

And Hillray wants war:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyaFsPKjZdo

And the Clinton Foundation is the most corrupt charity fund ever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnLHoqj-XRM
Post edited November 09, 2016 by Elmofongo
avatar
vsr: Why you have to be scared of anything when you are part of NATO?
Why demonize Putin?
I'm not demonizing him, I'm afraid of two super powers arming up again. NATO should be scary too since its all anti Russian in origin. It should have probably been dismantled after the cold war was over so we could work as partners without fear. However, Putin is scary because Russia is getting stronger and solidifying power towards himself, who knows what he might do with it? Just like Donald Trump is now scary because he wants to restart the nuclear arms race since Russian nuclear weapons are more advanced than ours. If he could consolidate power llike Putin has and remain in effective control of the country for the amount of time Putin has, you'd be afraid too.
low rated
avatar
sanscript: People haven't been dreaming of the USA since before the liberal Kennedy - It all went sour after that him.
avatar
vulchor: It sure did, and for those of us with our eyes and hearts open its been a waking nightmare living here. The problem is so many Americans still think we're the best and our ideas are the best, they can't understand that other countries have ideas and policies that have made them far better than us in all important international metrics. The cold-war era rhetoric of "socialism is evil" has forever damaged any hope of reforms in this country I believe, because people don't want to try to learn a new definition for something. They tie in emotions and let those overrule facts.
Liberals are the reason for this countrys downfall.
This is comedy gold!
avatar
jamotide: Why, there's not much difference between these two right wingers. But Trump will be way more amusing, so I think they made the right choice! Just like the Bushman was way funnier than Oh bummer. (except for the punability of the name)
avatar
SirPrimalform: Trump would be hilarious if he wasn't a real person. As bad as Clinton is she was by far the lesser of two evils. It's just a shame the Democrats chose such an awful candidate.
Honestly the Democratic primary was sabotaged by Deborah Wasserman-Schultz. We didn't necessarily choose Clinton. If primaries were fair and open, Bernie Sanders would have gotten the nomination, and then he probably would have beaten Turmp.
avatar
jamyskis: That's rich coming from a guy from a country with a proven history of interference in international elections, most notably providing financing to the French Front National (proven), to the British UKIP (likely) and to the German AfD (suspected).
avatar
vsr: You are talking about politician's business. I'm not a politician and i never provided anything to parties you mentioned.
I'm just amazed about level of hatred towards Putin among simple European folks.

For example, in Russia there is no such level of hatred towards Merkel, who is constantly threatening with new sanctions against Russia, or Hollande, who is doing the same stuff, or president of Poland, who is constantly begging for battle tanks from USA to "fight Russia".
I have to say, and I don't hate Putin personally - but the level of sanctions against Russia is beyond me. Like I've said before, more than often that only hurts the people even more.

I don't think Putin himself wants to derail Russia even further, quite the opposite, I also think he has stabilized the country somewhat - but I think he's fighting others (like most politicians) in the back room.
avatar
Years_of_Chaos: Liberals are the reason for this countrys downfall.
That kind of rhetoric is completely unhelpful and baseless.
low rated
When did Germans become so fucking retarded?
avatar
Crosmando: If a country cannot control it's [sic] own territory (and thus it's [sic] borders) it's [sic] doesn't deserve to even be called a country.
avatar
Vainamoinen: That's a bit of a difficult advice to give from a 97% immigrant country to a 98% immigrant country.
Very valid point.
avatar
Elmofongo: She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.
To put it in simple terms:

Clinton is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.
Trump is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.

The difference between them is that Clinton is a competent and seasoned politician. It's a quality you shouldn't underestimate when you're dealing with people of many different ideologies and cultures, both in your own country and in others.

Trump is incompetent, inexperienced and temperamental. That is what makes him so dangerous, and they're not qualities you want in a person with that kind of responsibility.
Post edited November 09, 2016 by jamyskis
avatar
vsr: ..For example, in Russia there is no such level of hatred towards Merkel, who is constantly threatening with new sanctions against Russia, or Hollande, who is doing the same stuff, or president of Poland, who is constantly begging for battle tanks from USA to "fight Russia".
Russia is much more active in the fighting department currently. That's why we have to threat economic sactions. Just as a small side note here.

But let's see, maybe Putin and Trump can become best buddies (same mentality if you ask me) and they will decide the fate of the world for the next years. Then you do not need to worry much about Europeans most probably.
avatar
sanscript: I have to say, and I don't hate Putin personally - but the level of sanctions against Russia is beyond me. Like I've said before, more than often that only hurts the people even more.

I don't think Putin himself wants to derail Russia even further, quite the opposite, I also think he has stabilized the country somewhat - but I think he's fighting others (like most politicians) in the back room.
The sanctions in Russia are targeted sanctions so they won't impact the populace, just certain wealthy and powerful individuals, however I think Europe has argued to go farther.
avatar
Elmofongo: She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.
avatar
jamyskis: To put it in simple terms:

Clinton is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.
Trump is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.

The difference between them is that Clinton is a competent and seasoned politician. It's a quality you shouldn't underestimate when you're dealing with people of many different ideologies and cultures, both in your own country and in others.

Trump is incompetent, inexperienced and temperamental. That is what makes him so dangerous, and they're not qualities you want in a person with that kind of responsibility.
...That should be the reverse

A poltician that is corrupt, arrogant, and beliigerent that is also competent at doing what she does makes it even worse no?

That only proves she knowingly is doing all the bad things she does.
Post edited November 09, 2016 by Elmofongo
low rated
avatar
Elmofongo: She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.
avatar
jamyskis: To put it in simple terms:

Clinton is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.
Trump is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.

The difference between them is that Clinton is a competent and seasoned politician. It's a quality you shouldn't underestimate when you're dealing with people of many different ideologies and cultures, both in your own country and in others.

Trump is incompetent, inexperienced and temperamental. That is what makes him so dangerous, and they're not qualities you want in a person with that kind of responsibility.
Are you autistic?
avatar
jamyskis: To put it in simple terms:

Clinton is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.
Trump is corrupt, arrogant and belligerent.

The difference between them is that Clinton is a competent and seasoned politician. It's a quality you shouldn't underestimate when you're dealing with people of many different ideologies and cultures, both in your own country and in others.

Trump is incompetent, inexperienced and temperamental. That is what makes him so dangerous, and they're not qualities you want in a person with that kind of responsibility.
avatar
Years_of_Chaos: Are you autistic?
Its as if he forgotten Libya and Iraq :P