Magnitus: I'm not ruling out putting a web dashboard for user interface driven management [..]
I'd totally reverse-engineer the Galaxy protocol after that and see if I could self-host a Galaxy-like server on my LAN for local multiplayer [..]
phaolo: Woa, you have cool plans for the future.
I wish Gog improved Galaxy and their website too, but sadly they aren't doing too well at the moment.
I hope it will be better next year..
Thanks. I'm not sure about the legality of reverse-engineering the Galaxy protocol part. My googling haven't been promising so far (Gog specifically includes a reverse-engineering clause in their Eula).
I believe that's what Linux did with Samba and Git was created because Bitkeeper kicked out the Linux kernel from their platform after one of their guys reverse-engineered the Bitkeeper protocol (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git#History) so there is some legal precedent, but even if it were strictly legal, there is something to be said about antagonizing the platform holder (in this case, GOG).
Overall, between their radio silence, lack of open api for pretty much anything they have and lack of inclusiveness with their Galaxy efforts, I get the impression that the management at GOG may be a little old school (ie, pre-open source mindset)... probably not community building material, at least not from a technical standpoint.