SargonAelther: This is why I prefer to be more optimistic. If we can do it with games and music, why not videos? We all know that Streaming is not going to prevent piracy and piracy should not be the main method of preservation. If there isn't much of a market for it now, I believe there will be one soon.
I think we should separate Games and Music.
Music CDs have been easy to rip for ages, and they rarely had any viable DRM.
Games on the other hand are still mostly DRM ... effective unless you go to significant measures to bypass.
For me, it is not a matter of being optimistic, just being a realist. DRM is the preferred modern model by providers, and DRM-Free is the much rarer exception. DRM-Free is more a hangers on thing than a growing movement. As the years roll by, less and less folk care about DRM-Free and ownership, and care more about access to the next new thing. As an older person I care a lot about DRM-Free and ownership, possibly too much, but that's how I am wired. I do however perfectly understand why many (majority) don't really care about those aspects or don't care enough.
GOG still have the
Movies section available, so they haven't killed it off as some kind of arbitrary choice. It has been dying a slow natural death. Prices have never really been that great, and I'm not sure GOG could pursue things any differently to how they have. How could GOG attract more DRM-Free movies? Is the issue with GOG or does it lie elsewhere?
SargonAelther: I also don't think that streaming will eliminate DRM-Free song sales. Again, what would be the point? You alienate DRM-Free audience and gain nothing in return. I certainly won't Stream. I still buy CDs lol.
Some albums and tracks are already unavailable except via streaming or DRM downloads.
The long game would be to make music only available via streaming or DRM downloads, so access can be controlled.
Of course, anyone can record their own music and provide it as they like, but when it comes to mainstream provided via a publisher it is a different story, because there is a middle party involved, and they want their cut guaranteed.
It is also quite easy to record music as you listen to it. With movies it is somewhat harder ... harder to get good enough quality ... though that will be subjective for some, who maybe don't care about things like surround sound or menus etc.
Many folk no longer buy CDs, just use Spotify and in many cases tolerate the adverts with the free version.
For the last few years I have given up on physical CDs and just buy the high quality files that are identical to what you get with a CD, even higher quality sometimes. Hopefully that will continue for many years yet, but alas not everything is available to download after paying, with access being via subscription only. I've given up on physical CDs because I no longer have the physical storage to dedicate to them, and I am sick of physical issues like manufacturing defaults or scratches, cracked cases, etc, plus I play everything via media players these days, especially in the car, which is where I do most of my listening via USB sticks or at home with my Hifi & TV system via harddrives, or in bed with my phone and headphones or out walking with my phone and earbuds. My CD player is reserved for CDs I haven't yet ripped to FLAC and MP3.
EDIT I'm not blind to some of the benefits of streaming, though I rarely indulge. Apart from amount of content and access to stuff I've not heard of before, the biggest plus for me, is avoiding those copyright messages and or videos at the start of a video on disc. They have long irked and annoyed me big time, such that I even removed those aspects on my many ripped ISO discs. Thank Dog we never had such play at the start of a music CD. Just so foolish to alienate your customers with such, and turn them against you. Would have been tolerable if they could have been skipped, but they mostly couldn't be.