Heh, I apparently only needed to focus for 5 minutes to finish the dang rough draft. And no one's going to read it til Monday so....
cristigale: Something that might be useful going forward, who here has played with whom?
I've played with bler144, flubb, Hyper, trent, Bookwyrm, vitek, and maybe ZFR (not sure if we've played an actual mafia game together)
Have played with
5. flubbucket
7. HypersomniacLive
10. trentonlf
11. Bookwyrm627
12. cristigale
13. Vitek (probably?)
Have kinda sorta observed ZFR. The others are unknowns to me. More shades of Oakwood?
elebutterfly: On account of them picking on SPF for using random.org for his vote instead of something to leave a trail, when a tiny bit of scrolling reveals the post in question was the second post of the entire game.... and they are now trying to get SPF to imagine who he would vote for in a 1st/2nd post legitimately? that gung-ho attitude is typical of an android pretending to be human.
But seriously, I find that a bit odd.
That's odd - no one has ever told me I was odd here. Even though I am occasionally a bit odd. Even oddly.
You may not find value in it, but it's a follow-up question to someone who admits they kinda dodged and otherwise hasn't left much of an avenue to converse with them at all. And whom I don't have any prior knowledge of, so...sure, it's thin.
RVS is, in general, mostly useless. To the extent it has any value, it's that it forces everyone to come up with some sort of explanation - valid or otherwise - that can at least be tone read. Maybe mafia tries to distance. Maybe mafia tries to buddy up to that player who tends to see through them.
Saying "this website told me x" is a) lame, and b) dodging what minimal value exists and shifting the onus to other players to move the game forward. I think you're also overvaluing my vote there, esp. given that I've already moved it. ;) And as noted in the post where I voted, I assumed a different day frame than is actually the case. But I don't regret the vote in any case.
Will asking him for some new facile reason produce something game breaking? Probably not. But as someone who is a terrrrrrible player at being non-town, I tend to give something away in RVS precisely because it is based on nothing other than superficial reaction (I've been scum twice, and the first time Krypsyn was on me from my first post, and the second time yogs), so I'm suspicious of players who try to duck the interaction entirely, awkward as it is, precisely because it is awkward by nature for some of us, and also there's a very thin slice of trying to push people to contribute more.
Which ties in somewhat to why I'm willing to pile on flub here in a way I wouldn't pile on adalia or wyrm for similar past antics. But that's a story for another day.
And let's face it, 30% of the reason to make that post was that embedded joke that I found hilarious but apparently you were not entertained by it.
Mostly for me this type of follow-up question is at least a potential doorway into getting them to talk about something. I had no idea what cristi would say to my, at the time, similarly shallow poking based on what was on the table, and it turned into a pretty interesting conversation. Is she lock-town or lock-scum? Of course not, but I have a much better grasp of what she's seeing and where she's coming from than before I asked. That has value, even if the path to getting there was a bit indirect.
/shrug