It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
My reply is getting long, so breaking it up to start the timer while I finish reading.

==========

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Huh. Bler dodged the question.
avatar
elebutterfly: Good catch! But why didn't you prod bler further..?
Did you see his response? I judged that I wouldn't get anything more by myself and no one else has seemed interested, thus further pursuit on my part was useless. If you actually care about Bler's dodge, then you try prodding him.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: My vote was parked uselessly, so I moved it in hopes of starting a viable wagon. I've seen some interest in Cristi, but I haven't seen much interest in Ele
avatar
elebutterfly: It's weird, isn't it? But a little inaccurate, if you re-read. So far SPF(#141, #295), rabbit (#206), Joe (#102 and #133), wyrm (#114) and Vitek (#153) have suggested I or things I have said are scummy, at various points. Literally nothing I have said so far has been seen as townie. .... aw. Putting it like that makes me sad.
Of those in your list:
-one is me
-two are in my favorites for scum
-I'm suspicious of yet another
-the last one in the list has also expressed suspicion of Cristi

Combine that with the fact that the only lynch vote you've received all game was during RVS (from the guy in your list who later more seriously voted Cristi), and I hope I can be forgiven for thinking there just isn't much momentum for lynching you right now. :)

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Why is it interesting that I mention Ele?
avatar
elebutterfly: ... because he has the both of us pegged as scummy. Um. It's literally right there in the second part of the sentence..!
So? How is that interesting, considering I've already labeled you as likely scum before he did?

Is it more interesting than him mentioning you as scummy, considering I've been suspicious of both of you?

avatar
elebutterfly: And you have already bounced to his defence like this before, back in #161.Allez, hop!
You reference 161, where I answer a question that Trent posed to the group at large.

avatar
bler144: But if that works...I also have this feeling Bookwyrm is going to order me the Calexico Pizza from MOD. And a six pack.
Are you going to feel special or creeped out [strikethru]when[/strikethru] if that shows up at your door?

avatar
bler144: 2. Pretend I'm not town-reading him - what's your argument for Joe being your top scumread at this specific point in time vs. when you first voted?
I don't have anything specific lines to point at. The feel of his posting just doesn't quite speak 'town' to me, especially his opening posts.

avatar
bler144: 3. Cristi has some prominent potential votes, but ... is this just a "Build it and they will come" vote?
There is a "build it and hope they come" element. In my experience, people are more willing to vote for someone they find suspicious if other player(s) also seem interested. You'll notice that some players are already trying to narrow the lynch down to two wagons that are already running.

However, it isn't 'just' because of that. I have been genuinely concerned that Cristi may be scum.

avatar
SirPrimalform: Actually, I thought Damnation's interrogation was helpful. You seem to be trying awfully hard to try and get Damnation to back off from ZFR.
You found it helpful that Damnation was accusing ZFR for talking as if "there are multiple townies in the game" is a sure thing? Sorry, "aggressively questioning".

I have no quarrel with Damnation pursuring ZFR, provided he does so with at least semi-reasonable questions. I do not find bat-boop insane questions to be a useful means of interrogating someone, but apparently that's just me.

avatar
cristigale: In both the games I reviewed and the ones presented in your links, flubs avatars, more often than not, point to his alignment/role. In flubb's case I DO THINK IT'S AI.
I completely agree that his avatars are very frequently related to the game in some fashion. My issue on the avatar analysis isn't that you used it as a clue on Flub (he's established it as a pattern, so its fair game. I made some guesses myself because of it), but that I've always seen it as Role related, if it has any game significance at all.

avatar
cristigale: in bler's crazy game, Bookwyrm originally lied about why he chose to use his role on CSPVG. Bookwyrm turned out to be town, but I was right that he was lying about why he chose CSPVG at the time. That is how this feels (that he is fabricating it).
I object. I've gone back to confirm my memory, and that isn't one of the ones where town!me lied. I didn't (and couldn't) deliberately choose to use my role on CSPVG. I had a list of numbers to pick, and the one I picked happened to apply to CSPVG. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I never said I specifically targeted CSPVG for investigation.

If the lie is some other point, then I'll be curious to hear what it was.

avatar
cristigale: But I also know that I could simply be in OMGUS territory. With that in mind:

@Bookwyrm – if you are scum – good for you, you yanked my chain.

If you are town….wow…I'm surprised that was your conclusion. I can see now how flubb's avatars have mainly been about roles (or generic game stuff) but that hadn't clicked, the way you describe it, as I was going through the process. I was never trying to PR hunt. I couldn't care less what flub's role is, I thought he was hinting Cylon. I guess you'll either have to take or leave it.
I'll concede that several of them could be read as AI, though I wouldn't have done so.

Suggestion: Lets come back to this question post game, once the main potential for lies/prevarication/stretching are out of the way. And if Flub turns out to be a Cylon, then remind me to offer you an apology. You get a multiplier for it if you are town and another multiplier if he flips goon.

In the meantime, I'll take a step back and re-evaluate.

Unvote Cristi

avatar
bler144: It didn't seem odd to me as raw conjecture - it is a major plot device in both the mini-series and [spoiler] later in the full series as well, that was annoying as shit in the show, and would be worse here because we can't just turn the game off. ;)
With me having virtually nothing but the broadest knowledge of the BSG lore, seeing "Hey, what if there is a player who is scum but doesn't know it yet" out of the blue right at the beginning of the game rubbed me wrong. It would be a distinctly unusual mechanic, even for GOG mafia, so why jump to it?

However, she also mentioned it being a thing in the mini-series which she just watched, so I was willing to let it slide unless/until more stuff came up. I noted a squinty face in her direction in Post 114, and this plus the initial interest in Flub's avatar (was she trying to lynch or out a PR on D1?) is why.

I thought Flub's tagline was a good catch, until it was later brought up that the tagline wasn't new. Still a point in her favor.
Likewise, Pylon/Cylon rhyme seemed really weak, but it was a point in her favor.
I didn't like the PR hunt aspect, but I couldn't pursue it at the time without drawing more attention to it myself. And then the PR hunt just...kept...happening.

avatar
bler144: Putting aside your dust-up with Damnation, he's not on ZFR's wagon. What's your independent read of both ZFR, and that wagon?
My direct read on ZFR is straight neutral (no read). I know he's sharp, and he's proven to be quite gutsy in the game where he was a mason. If pressed, I'd say he isn't scum simply because my scum card is already full.

I think the wagon on him is terrible because I think the things he's being attacked over aren't even the proverbial molehill. Unless something significant happens, I won't be joining that wagon at any point on Day 1.

avatar
bler144: You asked him his thoughts on brig mechanics, gently responded to his query about PR (though he attacked me as being too friendly, and not you for same), but you don't ask him anything meaningful, nor really commented on a read of him at all either way other than the (fair) response to trent in 161.
He isn't the only quiet person I pinged about brig mechanics.

I answered his PR question in the spirit of answering a relative newbie's possibly good faith question in good faith. I'm not going to put much effort into trying to explain him making a 'too friendly' attack on you but not on me; you can ask him that, he's plenty smart enough to defend himself. My no-effort guess is that I've only answered the one question, while he might perceive you as trying to buddy up to him at multiple points.

I see no reason to push ZFR at the moment. Plenty of people are already doing it, though I'm not thrilled about what people are jumping on him for. With several people making distinctly scummy posts, I simply am not as interested in pursuing him at this time. He can be sorted later in the game, same as Flub, Vitek, HSL, and Trent.

avatar
bler144: I guess I'm a little bit curious you aren't commenting at all on the largest wagon either as a good/bad/indifferent/simplyexisting thing in the context of trying to make other wagons. It is the elephant in the room, relatively speaking, isn't it?
I've made my position on several players, including my favorites for scum, clear already. I've been holding my "I don't plan to join the ZFR lynch" position in reserve to see if anything truly interesting comes out of ZFR being pressured.

To comment on another potential wagon, I'd be up for a SPF lynch.

Lynch Vote SirPrimalForm
Cheers!


avatar
elebutterfly: [...] It seems I misunderstood the tone of Wyrm's post - I had presumed "Would you lynch a player on D1?" followed by "Brigging is a reversible lynch" was a suggestion that we (and therefore Wrym too) might prefer to brig instead of lynch, since the brig is reversible. I reacted with outrage because lynching is still the only weapon town has. Brigging is poking with the soft cushions, in terms of actually defeating the monsters.[...]
Not sure I see how you could have misunderstood his tone when his complete point was [emphasis added]:
1) Would you lynch a player on Day 1? This is kind of like a reversible lynch. Heck, if there are only two cylons, we could end the game in a Town Sweep.
That's a clear indication that he sees the brig as an additional tool to the lynch, and not one preferably in place of it.

So, why did you leave out the part I highlighted in your post #226?


avatar
elebutterfly: [...] The fact that it's not the same as the series means that nothing here is necessarily the same as the series. Otherwise, knowing our sign-up numbers were somehow relevant to our role PMs, I'd have picked on Number Six (Joe) straight away for being a confirmed toaster wearing a red dress with a total disaster of a boyfriend. Also, on a warship, why would a Cylon snap someone's neck instead of picking up one of the many weapons lying around, or using what they presumably are equipped with? Is there a flavour reason for that? But like I said I haven't pursued this at all, and honestly don't attach much importance to it right now. Once we get some more death scenes it might become relevant. Or not..! [...]
[emphasis added]

Not sure what you mean by the part I highlighted - I thought that alignment/roles assignment is random (RNG, die)?

Since you're open to interpret flavour in relation to game setup (and vice versa?), I don't quite see how you consolidate this with what Damantion did rubbing you the wrong way (post #103); looks like a pot, kettle, black case to me, and wonder how your admitted awareness of you too bringing flavour into the game factored into you sort of backtracking from that now.

I also had another question for you in that same post, right under my reply to your previous games question, which you didn't answer:

avatar
elebutterfly: [...] JoeSapphire -- Leaning Town - was the first to list reads [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Not sure I follow why this is a town-tell; do you think scum wouldn't do it, and if so, why?
Did you miss it, or are you pulling a bler144-dodge?


I see Damnation grilled ZFR, and Bookwyrm627 and Damnation got into a pretty big argument over that last night. I need to reread all that carefully again, along with other more content heavy posts on the past couple of pages (6-7), but it will have to wait until later this evening; I'm meeting family from out of town in less than an hour, but will be back after they leave. Provided I'd still have electricity by the time I return home; fingers crossed.
avatar
cristigale: Now, finally getting to your question. I'm inline with what you said. My take is this is T/W. When I first read Dammation's grill on ZFR and Wyrm's initial response, I mostly agreed with Wyrm because the grill felt overly harsh. But the longer the back-and-forth continued, the more Damnation's side felt better and Wyrm's less. If the wagons were Wyrm and Damnation....I'd go with Wyrm. My OMGUS concern on wyrm still lingers. I am OK with the ZFR lynch and could go SPF. Both are in my POE but I don't see what you and Vitek see on SPR.
My only real ping was the ZFR vote felt off
Who is SPR? Do you mean SPF?

I sure do wish people would stop using initials for everyone's names and spell the names out, it's confusing :-/




avatar
cristigale: It's seems unlikely flub will be lynched today, so I will be moving my vote.
Why did you never move your vote? Are you waiting to see if ZFR can be lynched without you being on the wagon? Or are you just waiting so you can vote the second biggest wagon to make it look like you were trying to achieve a lynch today?

Why not pursue flubs lynch if you think he is scum? Just posting a semi history of his avatar in previous games and not much else is not much of an argument for his lynch, I even find it scummy that you would pursue someones lynch based on their avatar. A lynch should be based on how someone is playing and posting this game, any game previous or avatar previous means nothing now. I'll be keeping an eye on you.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I am starting to see ZFR as a frustrated townie and I think he would be a bad lynch. As I said before Cristi has been my #2 suspect as scum and I am moving my vote to her. Her vote on flub for his avatar is very scummy and I have not seen her try to really hunt scum, her only focus for the most part has been flubs avatar and what it means.

Unvote ZFR
Vote cristigale
The "shouldn't I be working?" vote count.

Lynch:

ZFR - 4 (JoeSapphire, littlerabbit, SirPrimalform, bler114)
SirPrimalform - 2 (Vitek, Bookwyrm)
JoeSapphire - 1 (Damnation)
flubbucket - 1 (cristigale)
bler114 - 1 (ZFR)
Bookwyrm - 1 (elebutterfly)
littlerabbit - 1 (flubbucket)
cristigale - 1 (trentonlf)

Brig:

Bookwyrm - 1 (Vitek)
elebutterfly - 1 (Bookwyrm)
Damnation - 1 (littlerabbit)

(With 13 active players, it takes 7 votes for a consensus to be reached.)

Day 1 will end tomorrow at midnight UTC (30 hours from now).
Post edited July 10, 2018 by PoppyAppletree
avatar
ZFR: Is that clear now?
It was clear before.;-)

It finally made me to haul my ass over there and check your posting there.

Results I got are inconclusive.
ZFR was much more laid-back and proactive there during D1, much less defensive and disimissive but he never got under that kind of pressure he got in here and he was 1 of 3 masons and it certainly helps to handle the pressure when you have 2 players who know you are town.
He also posted T/S list even earlier than we are in this game but most of those reads were "not sure" or similar.
He used random.org there too and even posted proof of it. Something I would find scummy if I didn't know he was town.

So he acted somewhat differently than here but there are also different cirumstances that could explain it.


avatar
JoeSapphire: I'm having super doubts about my town read of Vitek, ...
I thought you were so rugged!
avatar
elebutterfly: I'm consciously not using brig votes on D1, don't start on that again wyrm :P
Fear not, I've made my case and am more or less done arguing the usefulness of the Brig. I'll use it, and others can use it or not.

avatar
Vitek: For the last page EB and CG (yes, you are now all going to be just abbreviations :-)) get some town points and BW gets few scum points.
Then I took at previous BW's town play and took those points from him again.
Can anyone point me to a game where BW was aifam/mucs?
Is there an acronym dictionary or something?

I'm guessing EB = Elebutterfuly, CG = Cristigale, and BW = Bookwyrm, but I have no idea what "aifam/mucs" is supposed to be.

avatar
ZFR: What's LHF? From the context I understand it to mean "lynch for doing newbie things" but I can't find the abbreviation on mafia wiki.
I'm guessing "Low hanging fruit", as in "someone who is going to be easy to lynch".

avatar
JoeSapphire: And yet earlier you told damnation that you weren't baffled by it, but rather "what the ever loving crap?" A VERY telling inconsistency!!

Ah... this joke makes no sense. Damnation said you might be showing "baffled concern" so I can see now how maybe you were deliberately quoting baffled, but omitting the concern. If you were I found it very amusing.
Oh good. I started an eye roll/face palm with the first line, and had a "whew, he's not being serious" moment with the second.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] I was breaking the wagon ice, so to speak, since I'd seen a few people mention Cristi as being scummy, but no one has actually voted her. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: [emphasis added]

Well, Vitek was voting her from post #53 up until post #251...
*shrug* Looking back, that's true, so re-breaking? I'd forgotten Vitek had actually been voting her prior to my vote on her; I hadn't been paying much attention to her wagon before I moved over.

Trent, Bler, Vitek, and (presumably) Joe himself weren't going to help lynch Joe. That's already 4 of the 7 non-votes needed to block the lynch.

In the meantime, I recalled a few labels of her as scummy and not many people labeling her as town. Maybe some more people would emerge if her wagon became viable.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] Why is it interesting that I mention Ele? [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Is this seriously a serious question? The answer is right there in the bit you quoted...
Answer is in my response to Ele in Post 346. I left it open ended to see what he'd say.

avatar
HypersomniacLive: Not sure what you mean by the part I highlighted - I thought that alignment/roles assignment is random (RNG, die)?
Hopefully I can be forgiven for stepping in again.

As I understand it, the alignment/roles were randomly assigned to the various slot numbers before the game started. Thus, the kerfluffle around choosing/swapping slot numbers; you didn't know what each slot held, but you were effectively picking your role/alignment. With that said, here's a reminder that Character names won't reveal who is a Cylon.
avatar
elebutterfly: If you think Wyrm and I are scummy, what do you make of my case? If we're both on the list, isn't voting him a good move to see what happens? (For example, I might leap off the wagon at L-3 until "he explains himself" then leap back on again :P ) Or you could vote me and see who jumps?

I presume you read ZFR as the stronger scum, but unless the ZFR case sprouts wings somehow I can't get behind that in good conscience.
ZFR is, of my scumreads, the wagon with the most traction. But ok, let's see what happens.

unvote ZFR

vote Bookwyrm

*stares at elebutterfly*

avatar
Vitek: You mean like you did when we turned attention your way? ;-)
When I say wriggle away, I mean stop posting or not address things. I like to think I've been meeting most things head on. I did have an extra busy weekend that included a big birthday party so my posting rate may have dipped then. Joe was also at said party BTW.

avatar
Vitek: Joke it may be but it pointed me towards mafia in the past.
:S
I shall refrain from making jokes henceforth.

No, that was a lie. I can't not make jokes.

avatar
Vitek: Not searching for mafia.
*slow clap*


avatar
Vitek: The thing is I don't just see much attempts in your posts to solve anything. You voted bler (OK, you are not going to be all abbreviated. I hate it already) for buddying up/distancing with ele and then abandoned it. What's your take on bler and ele now, anyway?
Well that accusation was as much as anything to see if it provoked a response (Reckless Abandon™). I've continued to watch but I usually keep this to myself for a bit so the body of evidence is bigger. bler is looking more town to me now and I actually think ele seems to be trying to buddy up.

avatar
Vitek: Then said trent convinced you about ZFR but what striked my as most peculiar was when he convinced (after ZFR accrued 2 other votes). When pointed out you jumped off but clearly stating you are ready to get back anytime it is necessary.
I give you it is early so it was minor thing but to me it added up with other things.
When I have a lot of catching up to do I have a bad habit of posting as I go. Post 200 is an example of that, it was a reply to one of bler's posts because I had a reply notification but I wasn't actually fully caught up. I get that this is a bad practice but I wanted to go to sleep.
When I decided to vote for ZFR it was while catching up and didn't actually realise I put him at L-3. It's my fault for doing a skim read catch up.

avatar
Vitek: What's your current scumteam currently? Not 3 most suspicious player but who do you expect to be mafia team together?
Well the two go hand in hand. I could easily see BW and EB being teammates and I find both of them suspicious. I find ZFR the most outright scummy.

ZFR-BW-EB seems possible as a scum team, but I don't see as much linking the pair to ZFR, I just find them independently scummy.

Does anyone else think ZFR stands for ZirFrimalrorm?

avatar
Vitek: OK, OK, you got me, I was trying to be nice to you, you big goof.
It was that late Joe's game where we played older people in some sort of resort? We all had clues about others and there was something with gems going on. It was right after the other one where you were mafia and got flawless victory.
;_;

avatar
Vitek: I think that's a goal every player of mafia should strive to achieve.
I like to think my win record is 100% in this at least.


avatar
SirPrimalform: [...] Uhhhh... it's fairly obvious Damnation means the only verified townie at the start of the game is yourself and in a closed setup you can be sure what's lurking there in the dark. Scummier still. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: [emphasis added]

Is this correct, or was it meant to be "can't"? I'm also not sure I understand what the last sentence is referring to, in either case ("can" vs "can't"). Elaborate?
Well spotted. Yes, it's meant to be can't.

When you say the last sentence, you mean "Scummier still"? Well I got where Damnation was coming from and to my mind it seemed Bookwyrm was trying to stir up suspicion out of nowhere.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: You found it helpful that Damnation was accusing ZFR for talking as if "there are multiple townies in the game" is a sure thing? Sorry, "aggressively questioning".

I have no quarrel with Damnation pursuring ZFR, provided he does so with at least semi-reasonable questions. I do not find bat-boop insane questions to be a useful means of interrogating someone, but apparently that's just me.
I found it to be a reasonable question perhaps poorly phrased. The way I read it, the actual point was about the phrasing "other town players". Talking like that is the type of thing that shows up on my scumdar faintly. Damnation was right to question this, but I agree the question could have been phrased better. The point is, if you really are town in a closed set up, you shouldn't be making assumptions. If you are scum however, you sometimes have a better idea of the structure of the game.

By the way, is that meant to be bat-poop or Betty Boop? I feel like you changed your mind half way through.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: To comment on another potential wagon, I'd be up for a SPF lynch.

Lynch Vote SirPrimalForm
Well hotdamn! Now my vote for you is going to look like OMCUS even though I decided on it about half an hour before getting to this post.

In this case, I feel I should post this and then continue in another post.

Speaking of which, how do other people feel about Bookwyrm?
avatar
Vitek: ZFR was much more laid-back and proactive there during D1, much less defensive and disimissive but he never got under that kind of pressure he got in here and he was 1 of 3 masons and it certainly helps to handle the pressure when you have 2 players who know you are town.
Not only masons could help me, I knew exactly who to hunt for: 2 cyborgs, 2 mutants. Now I don't even know who the other players are. A closed set up feels so much different.

avatar
PoppyAppletree: Day 1 will end tomorrow at midnight UTC (30 hours from now).
Since we're running low on time and I don't want D1 to end with no lynch, and I don't see anyone else getting on bler's wago, I'm willing to switch to the other person I find scummy.

Unvote bler
Vote SirPrimalForm
avatar
ZFR: Vote SirPrimalForm
So soon after Bookwyrm? That is extremely interesting considering I have both of you pegged as scum.

BTW, read the title below my avatar!
avatar
ZFR: Vote SirPrimalForm
avatar
SirPrimalform: So soon after Bookwyrm?
Yes, because if he voted it means there is a chance this wagon will actually get traction as opposed to bler.

avatar
SirPrimalform: BTW, read the title below my avatar!
You read mine.
avatar
ZFR: You read mine.
Hahaha. It's a common misconception that Primalform is constructed out of the two words Primal and Form. It's actually an an Anglicised form of an old Italian name and is correctly spelled without the space (or capital F).
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is there an acronym dictionary or something?

I'm guessing EB = Elebutterfuly, CG = Cristigale, and BW = Bookwyrm, but I have no idea what "aifam/mucs" is supposed to be.
It's backwards. ;-)
You got all abbreviations right, bravo.
I am only said I got annoyed by it before I got to use the good ones like SPO for Sir Primalf Orm or DN for Dam Nation. :-/


avatar
Bookwyrm627: I'm guessing "Low hanging fruit", as in "someone who is going to be easy to lynch".
Kill me. I asked about it and then use the phrase myself wihtout figuring it out.
avatar
Vitek: Dam Nation.
I tried to have a boating holiday there once. It wasn't good.

Also the correct way to break it up is actually Sirp Rimalf Orm, but don't tell ZFR.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: You found it helpful that Damnation was accusing ZFR for talking as if "there are multiple townies in the game" is a sure thing? Sorry, "aggressively questioning".
avatar
SirPrimalform: I found it to be a reasonable question perhaps poorly phrased. The way I read it, the actual point was about the phrasing "other town players". Talking like that is the type of thing that shows up on my scumdar faintly. Damnation was right to question this, but I agree the question could have been phrased better. The point is, if you really are town in a closed set up, you shouldn't be making assumptions. If you are scum however, you sometimes have a better idea of the structure of the game.
Let me ask you some direct questions:
1) Is "There is more than one town player in the game" a reasonable assumption to make on Day 1 in any given mafia game?

2) Is such an assumption more reasonable or less reasonable than assuming "I am the only town player in the game"?

3) Is such an assumption more reasonable or less reasonable than assuming "There are no town players in the game"?

4) Given what we were told about the setup in the sign up thread, is such an assumption reasonable in this particular game?

avatar
SirPrimalform: By the way, is that meant to be bat-poop or Betty Boop? I feel like you changed your mind half way through.
Over the course of time, I'm attempting to remove/reduce/censor my use of profanity. I'm shamelessly cribbing the substitute from a webcomic that I enjoy.

'Batshit insane' is the uncensored version.

avatar
SirPrimalform: Well hotdamn! Now my vote for you is going to look like OMCUS even though I decided on it about half an hour before getting to this post.
Eh, do it anyway. You've been moving that direction for a good while now.

I was only wondering how long it would take you and Ele, or if ya'll would get distracted with some other wagon to avert your potential lynch.
avatar
ZFR: SPF for a meta reason I'd rather not mention,
avatar
ZFR: I also have a meta reason against SPF that I don't want to post but will do so after the game is over or in observer thread if there is one.
This is weird. Either you have something in which case you should be mentioning it to back up your vote OR you have nothing but want to allude to something to justify your vote.

"Oh, I have a super secret reason that I'll only discuss after the game" is super scummy.