Lifthrasil: Where do I imply that?
You said "I want you to start" which implies entitlement. I find it amusing, that's all.
Lifthrasil: It's funny how you misread me, which is something you usually don't do.
Come on now, we're past this dance in this particular game.
Lifthrasil: It's also funny how you build alternative cases against others, just in case that everyone does turn around and lynches me, right? Because you know that I would flip Town, so you have to have a backup suspicion built up. Like saying that you have something on CatV, which you won't share yet...
I find nothing funny in that. I am being lynched Today and I'm flipping Town Today. I don't care for anyone turning around and lynching you. As you see I'm not even voting for you nor making a case for a you-vs-me lynch Today. Why do you keep bringing that up after you yourself suggested I go first and it's your turn Tomorrow when you'll supposedly present Telika or CatV a well-deserved win? I stated numerous times that I agree I'm the more sensible lynch and more importantly - we can afford that. But you keep trying to make your point sound that much more valid. Why?
You also said it's customary to let someone make their claim before getting lynched. Since when it isn't customary to ask someone what they think just in case the game keeps going?
Lifthrasil: Because you know that I would flip Town, so you have to have a backup suspicion built up.
Come on, Lift. You're smarter than that. We both know there is no case in this world I can build if somehow you get lynched Today and not me and you turn up Town.
Lifthrasil: Like saying that you have something on CatV, which you won't share yet...
I'm not sharing it before the game ends even if it means it has lost us the game in the end, so there is no pointing at barking that particular tree.