It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
trentonlf: How do you know scum wanted to kill bucktoothgamer?
Blot is setting off one too many alarm bells, methinks.

(Also now oddly enough ZFR seems to[correct me if i'm wrong on this, ZFR] be suspecting yourself a bit along with others, and more trusting of Blot as of today[d2])

Don't have any other suspects atm and Blot is pinging my scumdar something wicked, so:

Vote Blotunga
avatar
JoeSapphire: Yes, that is what I'm saying. Hadn't you considered that before?
Considering I'm not scum why on earth would I want to consider them having my role? If you are asking about safe claims I didn't even realize that was a possibility until it was brought up by you, and if that's what you are asking then no I had not considered safe claims at all.
avatar
GymHenson:
You're being dense again.
avatar
blotunga: I wonder if mass name-claims would break the game at this point.
Doesn't anyone read it? Names were randomised and have nothing to do with the role/faction.
avatar
ZFR: Doesn't anyone read it? Names were randomised and have nothing to do with the role/faction.
Were they? They do seem to fit quite well in some manners. I don't think we should name-claim, but there might be something in the names.
avatar
JoeSapphire: Yes, that is what I'm saying. Hadn't you considered that before?
avatar
trentonlf: Considering I'm not scum why on earth would I want to consider them having my role? If you are asking about safe claims I didn't even realize that was a possibility until it was brought up by you, and if that's what you are asking then no I had not considered safe claims at all.
alright! I was only asking
avatar
blotunga: Well, scum could've targeted directly vitek too, but I think his claim is correct.
Your words from Post 868: "Funny that scum wanted to kill him and offed insted vitek."

Also even if you believe Buck's claim, either is viable....him being the target or Vitek.

avatar
blotunga: You're being dense again.
Willing to risk it. If I change course and you turn out to have been scum i'd be kicking myself.

Also you've been setting off one too many alarm bells for me to keep ignoring it.
avatar
ZFR: Doesn't anyone read it? Names were randomised and have nothing to do with the role/faction.
avatar
blotunga: Were they? They do seem to fit quite well in some manners. I don't think we should name-claim, but there might be something in the names.
here:

avatar
Lifthrasil: @all:
As far as I'm concerned, roleplaying is very welcome in this game. There is no connection between character name and role or alignment.
Yes, I admitted that Vitek also could have been the target. We will only find out when the game ends.
avatar
blotunga: Yes, I admitted that Vitek also could have been the target. We will only find out when the game ends.
That's not what you said, though.

Read the bit of yours I quoted in post 877 again plz.
avatar
ZFR: But you were so sure you'd be killed on N1...

I have a question for you: Do you think Lift gave the scum team safe claims?
avatar
trentonlf: That was why I was so frustrated, thought I would die N1 and wouldn't even get to use my power. I win if Town wins so me not using my power was the better option IMO since I was unsure who to use it on.

I don't know about safe claims, it's not something I would do. Mafia always have the advantage starting out and a safe claim would be a big swing in their favor that could potentially be to powerful.
OK and OK.

I just find it hard to reconcile someone who was extremely looking forward to using his role and sure he'd die on N1 with someone who calmly calculates that it's better if he doesn't use his role and waits till N2 when he's more sure of his reads.

But I think I'll drop this point for the time being.
avatar
GymHenson: That's not what you said, though.

Read the bit of yours I quoted in post 877 again plz.
Ah come on, it's not like you make poorly founded assumptions all day long.
To everyone else: Read the bit of Blot's that I quoted in Post 877 as well...then tell me how that sounds to you, and what faction would be more likely to say such a thing.

++++++++++++++++++++

@Blot Post 882: That line I quoted is crystal clear, and comes off as you knowing who the NK target was....so either you misspoke as town or made a major derp as scum. I, for one, think it more likely to be the latter atm.
I did make something similar as scum, but trust me I'm quite careful about such things. I just made an assumption. Take it or leave it.
Hey everyone and WOW. Already 150 messages to read? The things I have to read here started to rival my outlook mails.