Vitek: If the reaction of accused is scummy then it naturally makes the original case seem to have more substance than it did before that reaction.
Naturally, but you didn't use the word "scummy" in post 230, just OMGUS. So does this mean you think the OMGUS reaction makes it scummy?
Hunter65536: How do you feel about it now? Has his OMGUS reaction influenced your view of him? (like it seemingly did with Vitek)
Yes, though in the opposite way than Vitek.
blotunga's OMGUS actually cooled my jets. His OMGUS reaction is in line with his Townie reaction to an accusation, for example here:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/secret_hitler_2_everybody_is_a_star/post941 That's an OMGUS reaction when he was falsely accused.
I even made a remark on how his reaction to an accusation was very meek the one time he was scum
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/captain_sapphire_the_movie_gog_mafia_57/post566 Again, he was only scum once so there might be too little information of drawing conclusion, but I have that gut feeling. So overall his reaction moved gave him Townie points. How much? Tough to say.
blotunga: Actually the LAMIST remark was just that. I always get that when I say I'm town, so thought I return the favor
That's not what LAMIST is. LAMIST isn't when someone openly says "I'm Town". It's used for posts where you indirectly hint at being Town and attempt to do it in a subtlish way. Like "Oh noes! Our Cop got NKed. We will avenge you!" or "Hey, what does QT mean"?