So the thread was factually HIJACKED! Amazing! Most likely, Joe Broadway never expected this to happen!
However,
THINK!
1) Shirley shoots someone. Someone dies. NO PROBLEM! You only have one shot. You essentially become an Innocent Child. The mob might go after you or not, depending on whether they value more getting the other powers or getting the IC. So you might have a chance to linger.
2) Shirley shoots someone. Then nothing happens.... What then??????? Did she shoot the bulletproof or she is repeating the.
3) Someone raises from their chair and claims “I am Spart...”, ahem, “I am the Vigilante!”. What then?
Surely number 1) will happen, but just consider the possibilities. This is amazing and I like it.
I tend to think that Shirley says the truth. Why? Because, after her bold start, when she met earlly opposition by an early bandwagon with three fast votes, she overreacted a bit, it was like she felt it was especiall UNFAiR. That felt like a tell of a Power. Did not want to mention that and considered it for deflating the vote and eventually unvote. Now I can admit it openly. So:
I DO BELIEVE SHIRLEY. She is sexy, she is armed, and she is furious. Maybe she is fooling me, but I believe her. And if she is repeating Walkins’s bluff, damnit. But I do not think so.
Also, the game has stalled only because Cristine and Lonzi and (someone else?) are absent, although I guess that technically they can delay 48 hours? (now less).
@Cadaver: So, how do you like my read on the Cookie now? (see above). Do you understand why I was soft on her but not too much.
Also, I think that what
Cadaver is trying to say is: “Please Ms. Cookie, time me to that chair and spank my stern side with abandonment. This kabooze may have seen some rough days but it still can handle your vigour. I submit to the rigour of your righteous and well-shaped arm.”
What else? I do not like how Walkins has forced this on the game. Still I think maybe we are being steered or rather, cajoled into a chain of obvious lunches that are not entirely our own. Is this because he was Shanghaied into the game? On the other hand, Mike got full of holes and he did much less. I would like to hear the opinions of those who actuallly invited him to that lunch. No reflection on that so far, or if there was, I missed it.