LASER97: @Cadaver
By the way, your English has gotten much better since the first game. I haven't had any trouble understanding you.
Thank you very much. It's not the case but I'm glad. I would like to notify you that I sewn my pockets specifically for that ocasion.
But since you're understanding my bad English (it's bad, there is not denying)
could you please reply/comment just on 3 posts? 1)
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_66_lunch_at_gogs_restaurant/post234 2)
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_66_lunch_at_gogs_restaurant/post241 3)
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_66_lunch_at_gogs_restaurant/post388 >>>>>>>>
Scene labeled Micro as being LAMIST which is fair enough:
supplementscene: This sounds LAMIST with very little game solving
I asked Scene why he haven't updated the list if he knew about discrepancy:
Cadaver747: So you say you noticed that there was at least 1 discrepancy. Why haven't you EBWOP it? If you check my post I specifically waited for you and was ready for a bump. And you have chosen Cristi's post over mine... oh well.
And Scene replied:
supplementscene: Why would you assume I'd be A) be around to catch up B) understand the issue you had without explaining the issue you had? It does sound somewhat like you're trying to shade me off an honest mistake. I noted I hadn't had time to catch up with the game for a couple of days.
So he implied that he was NOT around and that my post haven't been informative enought for him to understand the issue, even though he knew about 1 disrepancy before hand. He even implied that I'm shading him for asking and mentioned that he hadn't time.
And soon after I mentioned that I was watching him being online:
Cadaver747: I waited for you to update your post (usually people check their posts) and you went offline after a few minutes, then you returned back online again for a few minutes.
I don't know if it was a bug but I saw what I saw and EBWOP could take just 2 minutes: 1 min for a bump and 1 for re-post or 11 mins in worst case.
I just want to know why one does not correct the mistake if it was known *prior* to the post. Is it SO strange to ask?
He changed his statement for a first time and admitted he actually saw my comment hence he WAS around:
supplementscene: I did actually check the thread and I had no idea why you bumped. I scratched my head in fact. I later realised you wanted me to update my 'who hadn't voted list.' But it's still worth noting who hadn't voted prior to Joe's initial vote count.
What is more interesting is that how he mistakenly thought that others who voted later actually "haven't voted 3 days on when everyone has voted":
supplementscene: You expect me to update my list of players who haven't voted 3 days on when everyone has voted?
Among others was the curious statement:
supplementscene: I still think it's worth noting who held off voting before Joe's vote count.
We would never know why it was worth noting, 4 times he'll ignore my query about it and at the end he'll said that it doesn't matter and I'm fixating on it.