Eh, Pooka was likely just being cautious and likely didn't have much to go on with the other players. I give them a pass on that for now.

Also BIG NOTICE: Red's claim makes me think we should all back off him today until we can verify his claim.

=============
=============

I think we should all take this on faith and give Red another "session" to prove his claim a bit further.....what say everyone else?

I'll be back in 3 hours, if the day hasn't ended already.

It likely will be, as OP said around 8-9 hours ago the day would end in half a day(irl).

========
========

Good points, but why vote pooka if I may ask?

I sympathise about the difficulty of playing on the phone, but it still reminds me a little of the way you jumped to conclusions as scum in Joe's last game. Especially after I pointed out your mistake the first time, that would definitely have been a good time to re-read my post and see that I didn't mention position in the wagon.

I see trent gave a reason along with his new vote so unaim at trent.

Honestly, I wasn't far off switching to blotunga. I'm not entirely convinced his 'confusion' about my post was entirely innocent.

A majority has to be over half the current number of players. We have 10 players right now so it's got to be 6 as 5 is exactly half.

Ok, with Red's claim I'm not willing to vote him today.

Would be willing to vote for blotunga or our lurky lurky nmillar and pooka.

Unvote

Vote Pooka

I'm still willing to go blotunga.

Joe, I know you're reading this so my bragging rights pick is blotunga and Pooka. If we have a third one (SK), I'll put trent there too.

I believe that's L-2 for pooka?

I would vote for pooka, but I'm more confident about blotunga so I'll hang back in case anyone's willing to switch. Lift hasn't given a "time is short" hint yet, right?

Oh, I get to be lynched early? Alright I guess.

Since apparently I'm still "lurking" according to....

*proceeds to aim at*

...blotunga, well. I'll put my vote back on him. I certainly don't like the argument, since I'm back here and paying attention.

Sorry, but you haven't contributed as much as in your usual town games. So at this point I'm sticking to my guns.

> haven't contributed as much as in your usual town games

Dude, you were in my only game as scum. You of all people should know that how much I contribute is not alignment-indicative of me. All that happened here is that I didn't look at the game for two days, and before them, the game was still stuck in RVS. Nothing sinister happening there.

Okay, I'm going to unvote RedFireGaming, and now setting my sights on those who jumped on that wagon.

@SPF Lurky? I'm certainly more active than the one post every couple of years until recently! Unfortunately, I have started my new job this week, so have limited time to post, but will endeavour to do as frequently as I can.

Actually if we count SH, two. And that's the vibe I get.

Blotunga, Micro seem the most likely now. Both far to eager to push through the lynch on RedFireGaming.

I'm also going with GameRager. I just feel the off topic posts are a deliberate ploy to keep people of the scent. Add to this, the unwillingness to vote for anyone, so he can't be associated to any wagons, gives him a huge scim vibe.

Willing to vote for any of these three.

SH is a mechanically different game, and also my first social deduction game proper. By then I had improved and bettered myself. The end result is the last two games. I was scum in one and town in another and I contributed just as much as the other.

Even if you don't vote me i'll likely either be lynched("aimed at") eventually as I usually have bad luck living long in such games.

As for voting, I am "shady" to some either way. If I voted for someone someone else would find a way to find it scummy, and if I didn't vote(as I haven't so far) people would find that suspicious as well.