Microfish_1: i see. thanks for explaining, Lift. Now I'm saddened because GR didn't get a chance to speak before the vote was hammered, and his commenting after-the-fact isn't as good of an arguement as beforehand woulda been.
I don't care for this. GR had a chance to vote, or at least to indicate his role preferences, even if he didn't have the RL time to respond to the thread.
PookaMustard: I know this is flub, who excels in being enigmatic and difficult to read, but still these two posts strike me as fishy. No explanations have been given for them until now. The second post hammered those two choices in, which as Micro says, didn't allow GR to chime in with his two votes on the roles. These two bits don't make sense from a Town perspective. They would from a Mafia perspective.
Counterarguments: the hammering post wasn't subtle. It's about as subtle as scum!dedo's final hammer last game. This subtlety (the lack thereof) would make sense for end-game, but AFAIK, this very post is the first with a proper vote for lynching in the entire game, and it takes place after this "brick in the face" hammer.
And I like this even less. I don't see a lack of town just because he didn't explain his votes (I didn't), or that he went ahead and 'hammered' without waiting for GR (see above).
I don't like the counter argument paragraph either. Just...feels yucky.
RedFireGaming: Unless I am mistaken, the cop won't have any information until the end of the first day.
End of the first Night. Cop gets investigation results at Daybreak. Though I guess that mostly doesn't matter as far as when Cop can report results.
RedFireGaming: the odds of dying on the first shot in russian roulette,
ZFR: You mean 9 out of 10?
XD