Lifthrasil: But hammering him just because I couldn't be there for the next 20 hours or so would have been mean towards the rest of you, because it would have deprived you of almost a full day of possible discussions and of a possible claim of flubb. I still think not hammering him at that point was the correct decision.
I'm getting some cognitive dissonance here. Your words make sense, but after years of pushing for us not to wait until deadline (including hosting multiple games where the deadline is somewhat uncertain), I wouldn't expect those words from
you.
Bookwyrm627: Is breadcrumbing scummy?
Lifthrasil: That's how I understood Micro's statement in this context, yes. Of course breadcrumbing can also be done by PRs. But using spelling errors for that would be strange. Especially since Town-PRs usually do not have a hidden chat where they could agree on some spelling error code. So I read that accusation from Micro as an accusation of scumminess.
My understanding is that breadcrumbing is done by players to drop hints about something, usually their role (they'd just say it if it was a matter of suspicion or something). Townies will do this (usually PRs, possibly vanillas), and scum trying to pose as townies (usually town PRs) will do this.
I'm mean, what sort of scum is going to breadcrumb that they are scum? I suppose I could see it in a game where there's a scum that isn't connected to the mafia team yet, but not in the setup we're playing right now.
Lifthrasil: I see. Thanks for the compliment, I guess. :-) Since that Secret Hitler game I seem to be perpetually suspect. :-)
The problem with winning as scum: no one ever trusts you again.
Microfish_1: In either case, you know (by virtue of being scum) or in your gut (by the dissimilarities between town and F me) that I am town.
Uh...
Microfish_1: I agree with this statement. I think Pooka is perhaps scum, but--if he lives he's as good as eliminated already as D3's lunch. Therefore, as ZFR was one of the biggest pushers for Pooka's elimination
vote ZFR I have been deeply concerned that I've been tunneling because I'm only seeing Pooka and Lift as likely scum candidates.
I'm not sure whether to thank you for broadening my horizons.
trentonlf: Ok the cop is suppose to find scum yet you choose not to investigate who you think is scum, I still don't understand your reasoning as to why.
This is actually one of the few Pooka statements that hasn't screamed "KILL ME I'M SCUM!".
It might make more sense if I rephrase it a little: "Don't spend an investigation on a guy [ZFR, in this case] who is going to die anyway."
PookaMustard: If I flip town, who's going to be suspect? And if I flip scum, will Lift come under fire?
I keep thinking about what to say, and I keep running up against the same wall: everything said is available for scum to read, too.
I know this might be frustrating for you, but
everything (generic) you says when you're suspected scum is going to be mistrusted. "Is he now trying to fish for reads so mafia know who to kill for best results?"
PookaMustard: If a power role is to breadcrumb, then would the lack of breadcrumbs indicating there is "another" cop strengthen my case, or weaken it further than it already is?
In your current circumstance, if another player has been breadcrumbing cop then you're screwed regardless of alignment (you're too suspicious and they've prepped better than you did). A lack of breadcrumbs has no effect on the case against you.
For breadcrumbing in general:
It depends on the player, the role, the breadcrumbs, and the provided reasoning. If you don't breadcrumb, then you can't point back to anything to say "I'm not just making this up right now and here's my proof." Just like any evidence, poor quality breadcrumbs might work against you.
On the other hand, if you don't breadcrumb then there isn't anything for your opponents to find and know whether/why to kill you.
Microfish_1: Trent is asking questions, but not saying much of anything of his own views.
Really?
Microfish_1: What are the odds that a player (In this case Pooka) is scum 2 games in a row?
Irrelevant. The probability of each event is not linked in any fashion.
Microfish_1: Book, Red, I want your opinions on the latest developments and arguments, specifically re ZFR's 4-scenario setup and since then.
I think most of the scenarios presented are missing some things. Also, see above about that wall.
Lifthrasil: [Micro] repeatedly listed [Pooka] as suspect
Maybe, but the impression I've had was that Micro was doing some work to dismantle Pooka's lynch.
-----
Pooka's posting has been atrociously scummy, however I'm still chewing over potential scenarios.
For the moment, I think this might be the better play.
Unvote Pooka It is easier to revote than to unlynch.
I've culled several responses to Pooka posts for the sake of not giving you people a bunch of extra things to read, but I'll save the responses in case someone really wants to know. For the record, the posts in question are 264, 269, 271, and 303 (sort of).