It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Bookwyrm627: So yeah. Care to explain the sudden about face on lynching Flub, right there at the end? Especially after complaining about No Lynch and then being the only person voting Micro?
avatar
Lifthrasil: I think that should be obvious. I had no qualms about lynching Flubb. He was scummy and he didn't do anything to avert his lynch. But I didn't want to hammer him when there was still a full day left until deadline. Especially not without giving flubb a chance to claim. (which he then didn't). Yes, if I had had the time to check in before end of the Day, I probably would have hammered flubb myself after his post 204. But for me it would have been an 'Oh shit' moment the next Day, when realizing that I killed a PR. Your reaction was, however, "Oh, hammering was fun!".
Mmm. Perhaps.

And of course, if we're picking over phrasing then your statement was "I'm not going to hammer him", not "I'm not going to hammer yet".

avatar
Lifthrasil: But to be honest, that does say more about your character than about your faction.
ZFR wishes to assure us that somewhere beneath my callous bloodlust is a heart of gold. Probably very deep.
avatar
Microfish_1: I've noticed several purposely mispelled words; wondering i this is part of breadcrumbing or not.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Constructing scumminess out of spelling errors is a bit far fetched.
Is breadcrumbing scummy?
avatar
ZFR: So... what's going on here?
That doesn't look good. If Pooka believed that Mafia chose roles after town, then the best move for town is to pick a strategy after roles have been chosen, so that the Mafia doesn't know what to counter. Since they wouldn't know whether the town would reveal the cop, there is still a chance they pick Godfather. But if they know town is going to reveal the cop, they pick strongman.

I'd like to hear Pooka's reasoning though.

avatar
trentonlf: For me as far as ZFR goes I don’t like it when someone wants to reveal a town PR, it’s never beneficial for Town to do that, and it makes me think they have ulterior motives involved. I would be more than willing to lynch him this my vote.
It also interests me that Trent voted ZFR for proposing Follow the Cop, even though Pooka was suggesting it on Day 0. Did he miss that, or did he vote ZFR first for a reason?

avatar
Lifthrasil: Constructing scumminess out of spelling errors is a bit far fetched. I think. And the 'if I survive' at the end looks very LAMIST. "Hey, look at me! I don't know whether I will survive the Night. So I must be Town! Right? Right?!"
Micro's posts seem hard to follow. I don't know if that's just his playstyle, or if it's intentional. He could be trying to leave his posts up for interpretation, thus avoiding taking a definite side.

=============================================

Now, in honor of GameRager...

Red glances at his fellow officers. Everyone still has little bits of GR on their uniforms. He shudders. He wonders if he can get a hold of Flub's whiskey.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Mmm. Perhaps.

And of course, if we're picking over phrasing then your statement was "I'm not going to hammer him", not "I'm not going to hammer yet".
Very keenly observed. Yes, with the little time I had, I already suspected that I wouldn't be back before the deadline. So 'I'm not going to hammer him' was a likely correct statement. But hammering him just because I couldn't be there for the next 20 hours or so would have been mean towards the rest of you, because it would have deprived you of almost a full day of possible discussions and of a possible claim of flubb. I still think not hammering him at that point was the correct decision.

avatar
Lifthrasil: But to be honest, that does say more about your character than about your faction.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: ZFR wishes to assure us that somewhere beneath my callous bloodlust is a heart of gold. Probably very deep.
Well, at least that means that you have hidden depth. I, conversely, am blissfully shallow. ;-)

avatar
Lifthrasil: Constructing scumminess out of spelling errors is a bit far fetched.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is breadcrumbing scummy?
That's how I understood Micro's statement in this context, yes. Of course breadcrumbing can also be done by PRs. But using spelling errors for that would be strange. Especially since Town-PRs usually do not have a hidden chat where they could agree on some spelling error code. So I read that accusation from Micro as an accusation of scumminess.


avatar
RedFireGaming: Micro's posts seem hard to follow. I don't know if that's just his playstyle, or if it's intentional. He could be trying to leave his posts up for interpretation, thus avoiding taking a definite side.
Possible. And that's exactly why I want some clearer statements from him.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: CRAP! I think I started a multi-quote post in notepad so I didn't accidently close the window, then continued in a new window with the next person's post but forgot to copy it, and closed the notepad window after making my reply thinking I'd already used it.

No wonder Trent didn't respond to my question. Boop me; now I have to figure out which questions didn't get posted. -.-
Ctrl + S is your best friend. If you're using Mac then this post makes no sense.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Because I thought that statement quite callous. Of course he couldn't know that flubb was a PR. But still after hammering one of the worst possible mis-lynches I would expect that a Town player feels bad about that. Bookwyrm doesn't.

For completeness sake: I am aware that flubb participated in his lynch and is mostly himself to blame for it. And usually I would also expect scum to feign some remorse. So Bookwyrm's callousness isn't strictly a scum-sign. But it sticks out and it is not a sign of him wanting to win for town. Because if he wanted Town to win, the loss of a PR would bother him.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Ugh. I had a whole paragraph over-the-top bemoaning how I hammered a town PR. It isn't going to feel nearly as funny trying to recreate it and I don't feel guilty, so screw it. Woe is me, or whatever.

Whatever. The salient point is reviewing Lift's attitude toward Flub over D1. I'm condensing and paraphrasing, but do let me know if I misinterpreted.

Post 72: Flub might be scum alongside Pooka OR Micro (Flub hammered town roles)
Post 74: Pushes Flub on role choices.
Post 100: Flub is behaving scummy; he always behaves scummy so he's an easy target. Is he going to get away with Flubbing? I think not? (Question mark in the original)
Post 106: Pushes Flub on role choices some more.
Post 115: Not content with Flub's answers.
Post 138: Still not content, thinks Flub is actually scum. Votes Flub.
Post 152: Suspicious of Micro but prefers Flub's lynch.
Post 162: Two days to go, prefer's Flub lynch but Flub Immunity a problem.
Post 182: Leaving vote on Flub since ZFR removed his. Suspicious of Micro (No Lynch vote) and Red (followed GR's vote).
Post 190: Only one day left and Flub's wagon fell apart! Vote Micro!
Post 200: Flub at L-1. I'm not hammering!
Post 233: Why doesn't Wyrm feel bad for hammering a Town PR? Vote Wyrm.

So yeah. Care to explain the sudden about face on lynching Flub, right there at the end? Especially after complaining about No Lynch and then being the only person voting Micro?

avatar
Lifthrasil: Also he seems to tunnel quite hard on Pooka. Maybe Books is on to something. And it is indeed interesting that Micro and Pooka were both in the 'Doctor driving group' of three and on the flubb wagon. But maybe Books is just focusing on the easiest target. So I do put Books in the suspicion bin right now. Together with Micro and yes, Pooka.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is it really a surprise that I'd vote Pooka, considering he's my top read for scum? I've had misgivings since D0.

avatar
trentonlf: If more people had actually been around come end of day Pooka could have easily been the lynch instead, but I am guessing scum had no desire to be around at end of day.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is it safe to assume the implication is deliberate?
It’s never safe to assume anything, but yes in this case the implication was deliberate.
New page bug bump?
avatar
Microfish_1: @MOD: I'll stick with voting Flub for now, with apologies to him if he's town.
avatar
trentonlf: Tell me Micro, what was the point of making this comment? You were the second vote on the wagon when that comment was made so 3 away from a lynch, but yet you found it necessary to apologize to flub?
You weren't playing in the previous game, if I remember aright, but I was bitterly(?) complaining that I have never spotted scum since Scene in #57. Every single time I have voted for someone--and they have been lunched--they flipped town. Every single game I have been town, and every single game Scum have totally fooled me.
Therefore, when I vote, I expect to be voting for the wrong person due to my track record. It stinks, and I hate it, but there it is.


avatar
Lifthrasil: I hope your replies will also explain some of the leftovers from Day 1. As a re-cap, what I gathered about you so far:
1) - you voted no-lynch because you didn't want to be involved with a mis-lynch. (how did you know it was going to be one?) And also because you wanted to experiment. (Post 196)
2) - then you voted flubb because you trusted my judgement. However, my second pick was you. If you are town, that pick was wrong. So why trust my other pick?
3) - you still haven't told us whom you rate as scum and whom as town. You told us whom you rate, but not as what.
4) - oh, and regarding your question what I mean with 'baseless accusations', it's for example this:
avatar
Microfish_1: I've noticed several purposely mispelled words; wondering i this is part of breadcrumbing or not. Worth checking into, if I survive.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Constructing scumminess out of spelling errors is a bit far fetched. I think. And the 'if I survive' at the end looks very LAMIST. "Hey, look at me! I don't know whether I will survive the Night. So I must be Town! Right? Right?!"

You know what, until you actually reply to those points, I'll put my vote back where it was before the Night.

vote Micro
1) See above, I think this fully answers that.
2) desperation. I thought that Flub was the scummiest player, and trusted Pooka. Then again, this is feeling like a repeat of the previous game's Book V Pooka match-up, and Pooka fooled me then also.
3) Leaning Scum: Pooka, Book(?), Trent, Red(?)
Leaning Town: Lift, ZFR, Book(? Cannot be on both lists, am unsure about where he should be)
4) I see. Thanks. Overall, I am a bit pessimistic as to my survival rate. I have done badly enough over enough games that (coupled with the fact that my posts do not really point to anyone) I expect to be an easy kill (or an easy snow). >:-(

I do NOT consider breadcrumbing scummy, just...curious. Curious to look into, but not so much that I'd search if I was eliminated from this game. I did it myself when I was a t!1-Shot Vig; I consider it useful. If someone did (as I did) make a series of oddly worded phrases or other remarks, I would look for a pattern to later see "do all these weird words connect to mean anything, or is it just their playstyle and/or puns."


I dearly want Pooka's reactions to all that has happened. I am on the verge of voting for him, but I fear that my willingness to vote for him means he is town.

=========================
wipes bits of Gamerager off of himself and searches a change of uniform and the nearest shower. Considers that perhaps Sapphire should not know about this event, or that it might energize the sick half of the Unbeatable Duo to action.
Ah, I missed quite a ton.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Honestly, I'm a little surprised that you and Lift both think "this stinks" didn't mean much.
Well, as Lift himself said it, "this stinks" didn't say what about his post smelled.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Also, from this I gather that you read Lift as town?
Yes.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Disarming one's "strongest opposition" (your words, post 235) can be exceptionally useful for preventing one's lynch. If the biggest accuser wanders off, the momentum may die entirely. Buttering up can be a part of that strategy.
If I want the biggest accuser off me as scum, I could just as easily put a vote on you and end it right there, implicate you of being scum, something like that. If I want to butter up to someone, I would have paved the way for it from the beginning of the game (see last game and how I pocketed gogtrial - from the beginning of the game and he was singing praise for me, and I was able to rely on him to come to my defense when I slipped), not on Day 2, and especially not when I'm in trouble anyway.

avatar
Lifthrasil: Wait. This sticks out like a sore thumb and I missed this before: you thought, that scum get to pick their role AFTER we publicly choose ours? And you still suggested Follow the Cop? Why? That strategy doesn't make any sense if scum can pick their role to match Towns pick. If scum knows that Town has picked a Cop and is planning a Follow the Cop strategy, they would definitely pick Strongman - and that would ensure that the Cop doesn't even survive the first Night. So 'being interested in Follow The Cop' under your (false) assumption that scum gets to pick after Town is just the same as 'being interested in eliminating the Cop'.
@ZFR too

Under this false presumption, just as they could pick strongman to eliminate the cop, they could also pick godfather to fool the cop into believing and trusting someone. It's either just make all lynches go through, or have a scummy someone look so good which the cop finds them to be Town. The way it works is Town picks one of two roles, and Mafia has to select a role to counter one of these two. The only way mafia can completely nullify town PRs is if they're both Tracker and Watcher, which can be both subverted by the Ninja at once.

avatar
Lifthrasil: And yet you were the one to bring Doctor to V-1. You voted Doctor right after Micro re-kindled the Doctor train. So flubb hammered in your preferred role. Yes, it was out of the blue and I was suspicous of the way the Doctor was pushed in a short time afterwards. But you were part of that pushing. So you can't have been unhappy with flubbs choice.
Indeed I chose Doctor, and I would've been happy with it if it meant Follow the Cop actually worked. I wasn't unhappy with Flub's choices, but merely the fact he hammered them out of the blue looked scummy and made me doubt my choices, as if knowing the mafia had a plan and we fell for it. Now that things have unfolded the way they do, I have no doubt the mafia is already celebrating with wine and champagne.
avatar
PookaMustard: @ZFR too

Under this false presumption, just as they could pick strongman to eliminate the cop, they could also pick godfather to fool the cop into believing and trusting someone. It's either just make all lynches go through, or have a scummy someone look so good which the cop finds them to be Town. The way it works is Town picks one of two roles, and Mafia has to select a role to counter one of these two. The only way mafia can completely nullify town PRs is if they're both Tracker and Watcher, which can be both subverted by the Ninja at once.
Sorry, but I don't understand the answser. My question is, how did you expet FtC to work, if you thought Mafia could pick a role after Town and nullify the strategy?
avatar
PookaMustard: @ZFR too

Under this false presumption, just as they could pick strongman to eliminate the cop, they could also pick godfather to fool the cop into believing and trusting someone. It's either just make all lynches go through, or have a scummy someone look so good which the cop finds them to be Town. The way it works is Town picks one of two roles, and Mafia has to select a role to counter one of these two. The only way mafia can completely nullify town PRs is if they're both Tracker and Watcher, which can be both subverted by the Ninja at once.
This does not answer the question. Why did you think Follow the Cop would be a good idea if scum could pick a Strongman after knowing that a Cop would be in play? Let me repeat, under the assumption you claim to have made, Follow the Cop would be 'Eliminate the Cop' - and only scum could be interested in that!


EDIT: oh ffs. ZFR was quicker than me. Again! Well, the question still stands.
avatar
Lifthrasil: ...
avatar
Lifthrasil: ...
Okay, there's something I missed earlier. Someone (ZFR?) said that Follow the Cop works like this: someone claims cop on the first day, and they get protected from then on. I thought it was "doc figures out cop via breadcrumbs and protects him." So when I said that "Follow the Cop" was a good idea, I thought it was in a sense that mafia shouldn't be able to deduce who is the cop on an easy platter and figure it out, while the doc finds him as soon as possible.

I really dropped the ball this time around.
avatar
PookaMustard: I thought it was "doc figures out cop via breadcrumbs and protects him." So when I said that "Follow the Cop" was a good idea, I thought it was in a sense that mafia shouldn't be able to deduce who is the cop on an easy platter and figure it out, while the doc finds him as soon as possible.
You've proven yourself to be very intelligent in the past games, including the first SH you played. It was gogtrial's underestimation of you (a newb wouldn't play that way!) that cost Town last game.

Let's say Cop breadcrumbs and only Doc picks on it, while both Mafia are oblivious of it. But after that, how on earth is the Cop going to reveal results? The whole point of the strategy is that Cop has to tell his results to Town so they know how to vote. So how can he do that without revealing himself.

You thought "doc figures out cop via breadcrumbs and protects him." What did you think happens next? On D2?

If what you say is true, I'm going to be very disappointed in you.

Incidentally, where did you get information on "Follow the Cop"? The mafia wiki page makes it clear from the beginning:
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Follow_the_Cop
"The Cop claims immediately,"

I find it easier to believe that "I thought mafia choses second!" was an attempt to show you're not mafia. I know I used such methods in my first game top hide my masonness ("What does QT stand for?") so I'm really wary of statements like these (hence Lift's "there are 3 mafia" smelled to me).

All this, coupled with your "I'm at L-2. The 2 mafiosos can quickly hammer me now!", makes me think that you are scum.

Vote Pooka
Okay, that's L-1. I can't see myself living beyond Night 2 in any capacity, so I'll happily sign my death with my own hands if it meant narrowing the list of possible scum. Time for the role claim.

I am the town cop.

During the Night, I have investigated Lifthrasil, who turned up Town.

This leaves out five players for possible scum, if Lift is not Godfather:
- Microfish
- Bookwyrm
- RedFireGaming
- trentonlf
- ZFR


@ZFR I got the "Follow the Cop" idea from Bookwyrm. I wanted to setup a Mafia game on Discord, so I asked him for setups, and he told me to avoid setups that would use an unchecked form of the strategy.
avatar
Lifthrasil: ...
avatar
PookaMustard: Okay, there's something I missed earlier. Someone (ZFR?) said that Follow the Cop works like this: someone claims cop on the first day, and they get protected from then on. I thought it was "doc figures out cop via breadcrumbs and protects him." So when I said that "Follow the Cop" was a good idea, I thought it was in a sense that mafia shouldn't be able to deduce who is the cop on an easy platter and figure it out, while the doc finds him as soon as possible.
How? If the Doctor is able to follow the breadcrumbs, so is scum. There is no way "that mafia shouldn't be able to deduce who is the cop on an easy platter and figure it out, while the doc finds him as soon as possible", as you phrase it. You either really dropped the ball hard, or your 'I thought Scum would pick after Town' actually was LAMIST, as ZFR (or was it Bookwyrm) accused you of. Perhaps you already knew that scum had picked Strongman and that was why you pushed the Cop vote and suggested FtC as strategy.


Edit: ah, there is your claim. Good that I refreshed before posting, since I was about to put you at L-1 too, to make you claim. (That would have been disastrous now, that ZFR already put you at L-1).
Unfortunately it is exactly the claim I expected under the assumption that you were scum. Including the claim of having investigated me. That would fit too, since I'm undecided on your alignment and giving me a town-read might pull me in your 'camp'.

However, it is also possible that you actually are the Cop and did investigate me. But in that case I'm curious: why did you investigate me and not ZFR, who was your preferred target all over Day 1?