Things are still quite busy, I hope I don't have to ask for a replacement but until that clears up I've stolen a few moments to catch up.
PookaMustard: By the way dedo, I see you think I could be possible scum along with Joe and Micro. But is there anything to support me being not possible scum along these two? Like, I'd love a list on what of my play is town and what of my play is scummy.
I've already said a couple of times that so far it felt like you were actually trying to figure the game out. gogtrial will probably spit at me for this, but please, please, please don't make me write the same damn thing again. I neither have the time nor desire to reiterate things and I promise you I'll point things out as soon as something new comes up or changes from it's previous state.
On what I find scummy - nothing in particular. On D1 there was a small quick shift in votes towards Scene which made Trent jump and it did make an impression on me but I'm not really putting too much weight on it. I've listed you in one of the scum pools because, well, there is scum among us and after looking at the wagons and who did or didn't do what I ended up with a few pools that make sense in different scenarios. It just happens that you are in one of these pools - that doesn't necessarily make you the most nor least scummy, I just have to consider that some of the people I'm Town-reading may have fooled me and so far there is only two people that I just can't see that happening for.
As for GR's wagon - I can't blame most people on it for being on it. Others may not agree entirely or at all with me but in my book he was just off on a number of plains. That's the worst part about such lynches where a Town player provides so many reasons for legitimate lynch that mafia basically get it for free. That being said, scum (especially a lonely one) pretty much had to make that mislynch happen at all costs just to stay in the game for a little longer and try to turn things around. That's the wagon cannot just be discarded.
I hope this answers your question.
JoeSapphire: yeah sorry it wasn't supposed to make sense. There's no reason why I should trust your bookwyrm read, and yet I find that I do. Leap of faith?
Right. If you said so I wouldn't have said anything probably. You just keep weirding me out with the reasons you give people credit (or take it away). You have a pretty mouth, though, so I'll let you with a warning this time.
JoeSapphire: I would support these wagons:
Trent
Flub
Microfish
I will not join these wagons:
Gogtrial
Pooka
Supplementscene
Joe
I see. Bookwyrm627: Gogtrials point about Gamerager not interracting with SPF made me believe Gamerager was less likely to flip Mafia, while I hoped he would.
This keeps getting brought up. Maybe I'm just stupid but this point makes zero sense to me and it's one of the few if not the only one thoughts of gogtrial that I find nonsensical.
supplementscene: 2. I won't give that list just yet but nearer deadline for several reasons.
When is this going to happen exactly? Well, not exactly but a general approximation of the time frame would be appreciated.
On the same note, @Wyrm, what is your stance on this particular point? (pre-post edit: I see you voted Scene, is that related in some way?)
gogtrial34987: Did dedo go down, or did Pooka go up between these two posts? Why?
It's not impossible for dedo to go down on Joe ['s list], him being hot just like an oven.
gogtrial34987: As an aside here for those who weren't there: mafia!scene claimed doctor in #55 (which was C9++ "with a twist"), and
wasn't able to answer the question if he could self-protect at that point.
Ha!
gogtrial34987: * flub: As I wrote in a roundup post yesterDay, he was far too instrumental in both blotunga and GameRager's wagons, and he not usually that wrong.
How wrong is flub usually?
gogtrial34987: I'd "cleared" him to myself yesterDay based on SPF's lack of meaningful posts directed toward him, but am putting less trust in that now.
gogtrial34987: Also, SPF didn't interact with him.
Bruh. Screw it. To each, their own, right?
Microfish_1: FWIW, when I don't have solid suspicions,
I try to just nose around calmly and inoffensively, gathering data from the on-deck circle.
Emphasis added by me. The issue with that is that it's a particularity of players who don't want to attract attention. Which is more often than not a not-so-great sign.
PookaMustard: You have to explain this. I
MUST hear it.
After the game ends I can tell you what I remember about it or if you feel like it you can read the actual game. I'm not sure which one it was, though. Maybe someone else can help with that.
supplementscene: I found you Scummy on Day 1 and you could be, I'll re-read if I survive today.
supplementscene: VOTE TRENT Is that the list?