Microfish_1: Maybe Joe
is scum, and voted me as a result. This moves him higher in my "Willing to lunch" chart
This makes me think Micro is scum.
Microfish_1: ....
I said much of yesterday that I did NOT like GR's playstyle; it was bad for town, and yet I recognized myself in parts of it. The unwillingness to start a train was not good. The final nail in the coffin was his statement that he'd played a Town Doc on this forum; I went thru the list of previous mafia games, and he was NEVER a town doc. This was either a) a lie (scum) or b)mis-remembering (town). The lie was more evidence than we had against anyone else.
I WANTED
Scene's lunch; I said that from the end of D1 thru the near-end of D2.
I swapped BECAUSE 1) we were running out of time, 2) scene's wagon was going nowhere (had two votes--myself and GAMERAGER (TOWN-RB), 3) my second-fav (as mentioned previously) target was GR (due to aforementioned scummy-looking play), 4) GR lied-wittingly or un, 5) we needed
something to analyze, and 6) see 1). If Pooka and a few others had jumped on scene, we could have probably lunched scene instead
.....
This makes me think micro is town.
Microfish_1: .....
This. Is.
Rich. We have played in one game together; I was town, you were scum. I
have never played mafia as scum before--always town--and you have the audacious nerve to claim that this looks different from my town play. You don't even know all the facets
of my town play. I even said
last game that from then on my town play would be different due to not liking what my playstyle did to me the first game. IIRC, I said as much in this game. Your "previous experience pool" of my playstyle is 1-2 games,
max. Also, it should have been incredibly obvious to you that my vote on Joe's unexpected, unwarranted, and unprovoked OMGUS vote just now was in itself OMGUS. That you didn't pick up on it is...bad.
.....
This is an unexpected reaction, but I don't know what to make of it.
Microfish_1: ....
So why not vote for Book? It seems your case is better against him than me.
....
Do you want me to?
I'm not voting for bookwyrm because I think his rally against a town powerrole refusing to acknowledge the positives to NOT lunching that powerrole was too audacious for scum.
Bookwyrm, Dedo, Trent - in the last game we played it got mentioned a few times that Bookwyrm's scum game is quite obvious and easily recognisable to Yogsloth and dedo among others. I've been assuming that tearing out of the woodwork thirsting for town roleblocker's blood is something that mafiesque bookwyrm wouldn't do. Is that the case?
Ugh. Overall I think I want to unvote microfish.
Gogtrial can't be mafia because he didn't want GameRager's lunch (unless he was supremely confident it would go through without him...)
Trent can't be mafia because he refused to vote GameRager - but Trent does that sort of thing anyway.
Dedo can't be mafia because he town-reads me when mafiesque-dedo would have no business to.
Bookwyrm can't be mafia because of End of Day 2.
Micro can't be mafia because he waited till the very end to join GameRager's wagon.
Scene can't be mafia because he claimed vanilla town early for no reason and has appeared to draw town conclusions
Flub can't be mafia because he was seemed convinced about GameRager and was confidently utterly wrong. (hmmm... questionable)
Pooka can't be mafia because we've all been assuming he's town all game?.. Why do I think pooka's town I forget?
SO:
MOST TOWNY
^
Gogtrial
SupplementScene
Bookwyrm
Trent
Dedo
Microfish
Flub
Pooka
v
LEAST TOWNY
Microfish_1: Yes, I was a decent town player in 57, I also stated elsewhere--in PMs (Joe can vouch for this) and in public--that I couldn't healthily keep up that kind of work.
Oop, yeah I remember this... Now I feel like an insensitive jerkwad.
Alright. We're stuck. Give us a hint.