gogtrial34987: I wasn't questioning your mod vote. I was questioning why
scene found trent's mod vote noteworthy, but didn't comment at all about yours until the second time I asked him about it, at which point
he basically dismissed your mod vote as unimportant.
If scene is scum, then this difference in attitude toward near-identical actions might point a little bit more in your direction than in trent's.
supplementscene: OK now I'm actually sure you're Scum. Instead of picking up on my point that I personally know from out of game Microfish has time to play and isn't posting as much
You mean the point for which Microfish gave a perfectly satisfactory explanation for in the very post that I was replying to?
supplementscene: you linger on about a mod-vote
I wouldn't describe me as "lingering on" here. Microfish was responding to something I questioned you about, which involved him, so I thought it worthwhile to clarify that I wasn't questioning him about it, and to explain the reason
why I questioned you about it.
supplementscene: implying I'm defending him when in fact I've been quite critical.
At the point I first questioned you, way back in
#123, you had as a matter of fact not been quite critical of him. You had ignored him completely, despite casting the same mod vote that you called out trent for. Then you ignored my question about this. You first mentioned microfish in
#145 (not critical, only asking him to contribute), and only "became critical of him" - after I asked a second time - in your response to me in
#190.
There probably is a technical mafia-term for becoming critical about a person only after you've been asked why you aren't critical of that person.
supplementscene: OK now I'm actually sure you're Scum.
Walk me through your reasoning on this?
If microfish is scum, then me not going "a ha! you use discord on mobile but not the forum, which must mean that you're scum!" means that I'm scum myself who's defending him. That 'makes sense'.
And if microfish is town, then... me
not taking up your reasoning and trying to cast shade on him based on it, means...
...
All of this is worse than a discussion about the merits of no-lynch, isn't it?
Meh.
Joe: Is Bookwyrm your scum buddy?