It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionGOG Mafia #59 - Previously on Mafia...(1130 posts)(1130 posts)
(1130 posts)
Pages:
1
10
14
15
16
17
18
30
40
50
60
70
76
This is my favourite topic
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
dedoporno: That's pretty much what is bothering me about him - this sense of purpose and intent to execute a carefully planned play, but the play itself and the way it was executed wasn't wasn't (in my personal opinion) that great to to justify it.

I'm not sure if that made any sense...
Don't worry, it didn't.

Can you clarify, especially the double negative (wasn't wasn't)?
Posted June 13, 2019
vote sofia321
avatar
SirPrimalform: I don't follow your logic for those being the only two possibilities. You find it impossible for town!trent to find you scummy for any legitimate reason?
avatar
supplementscene: Obviously some Town players find me suspicious. Is Trent one of those, possibily. But the fact he's unwavering and also isn't keen on being revenge lynched if I show up Town doesn't quite sit right.
Yes, but your earlier post held that the only way town!trent can find you scummy is bias. And bias or no, why would town!trent be keen on being revenge lynched? Town!trent knows he's town so he's naturally going to oppose it. In the event that this is town on town then we'd be two townies down after your plan with little proven.
This feels really flip-floppy.
Post edited June 13, 2019 by SirPrimalform
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
agentcarr16: Can you clarify, especially the double negative (wasn't wasn't)?
There's not much to clarify. It's obviously an editing error on my part. The secret is to imagine one of the "wasn't"s isn't there ;)
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
agentcarr16: Can you clarify, especially the double negative (wasn't wasn't)?
avatar
dedoporno: There's not much to clarify. It's obviously an editing error on my part. The secret is to imagine one of the "wasn't"s isn't there ;)
:thumbs-up:
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
PookaMustard: .............

Anyway, I am atill iffy about scene, and I think it likely that scene and trent are on two different teams, with more of an inclination that scene is scummy.
............
and


avatar
PookaMustard: ............

What's also more interesting than the vote number is the speed of the growth of the wagon. In just two days, scene got five votes, which is more suspicious than if he had gained these five votes over the whole week instead. That's my main issue with scene's wagon, and if we assume one or two scum kickstarted it, all it would have taken is the remaining scum or a reckless Townie to seal the day early.
I agree. Vote position is less an exact science and more a piece of the puzzle.

I gave my opinion regarding the speed of the votes.

Are you still suspicious of Microfish_1??
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
PookaMustard: Anyway, I am atill iffy about scene, and I think it likely that scene and trent are on two different teams,
avatar
JoeSapphire: Does that mean if scene is town you think Trent is likely mafia?
Yes. Highly probable.



avatar
flubbucket: I agree. Vote position is less an exact science and more a piece of the puzzle.

I gave my opinion regarding the speed of the votes.

Are you still suspicious of Microfish_1??
My vote on Microfish is a leftover at this point. The thing with scene is the current thing to watch for, so I will have to...

UNVOTE MICROFISH
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
JoeSapphire: Does that mean if scene is town you think Trent is likely mafia?
avatar
PookaMustard: Yes. Highly probable.

............
Based on super gut feelings or tarot insight??
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
JoeSapphire: Does that mean if scene is town you think Trent is likely mafia?
avatar
PookaMustard: Yes. Highly probable.
oh.



avatar
SirPrimalform:
Blotunga: scum or no?
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
SirPrimalform:
avatar
JoeSapphire: Blotunga: scum or no?
I'll quote myself:

avatar
blotunga: Yes, I think there is a high chance scene is town by the speed the wagon go traction. Now I'm aware that my vote can be misleading, though I never intended to stay there for long.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Uhhh... you thought the wagon was going suspiciously fast and your response was to add your vote to it? Regardless of whether you intended to leave it there or not, your vote was exacerbating a situation you allegedly regarded as suspicious.

Seems weird to me.
I don't think I got a response to this but Biotunga hasn't made many posts since then. Would consider have lunch with.
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
supplementscene: But I still think spots 3, 4, 5 on any Town wagon are highly irresistible for the mafia player
Also me, because it means I might get to see someone die. Except for my wagon; I don't do it on my wagon. Anymore. Much.

avatar
supplementscene: If this is true, I'm willing to vote for myself so long as 6 players are willing to lynch you on Day 2 if I show up Town. It will either show one of the following:

1. You're Mafia
2. You're unable to seperate personal feelings from Mafia games
Does this apply to me as well?

avatar
agentcarr16: Gogtrial34987 is throwing some weird shade at me for my RVS vote.
Where/when, and how so?

avatar
PookaMustard: if we assume one or two scum kickstarted it, all it would have taken is the remaining scum or a reckless Townie to seal the day early.
Could you elaborate some on this?

avatar
GameRager: 2. I don't post much in such threads...just a head's up. I usually lurk and respond to few posts while making my mind up on people playing.
Be advised that this is a good way to get yourself killed. If you don't talk, you are hard to read. If you are hard to read, it is hard for people to sort you as town.

By way of example, I'd be happy if you got lynched because your lurking looks like a scum trying to avoid commitment or attention.

avatar
supplementscene: But the fact [Trent]'s ... isn't keen on being revenge lynched if I show up Town doesn't quite sit right.
Is this something only scum would do?

avatar
supplementscene: But [Agent's] vote makes sense from a Town perspective too.
Why?
Posted June 13, 2019
A slow day today

avatar
supplementscene: But [Agent's] vote makes sense from a Town perspective too.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Why?

avatar
supplementscene: But the fact [Trent]'s ... isn't keen on being revenge lynched if I show up Town doesn't quite sit right.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is this something only scum would do?
1. Because Spot 4 on Wagon in the first 24 hours looks scummy and oportunistic

2. He's certain I'm fascist right, are we just letting fascists misslynch here?

And given the Gogtrial wagon isn't going anywhere and the Blotunga one looks too convenient

VOTES TRENT
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
supplementscene: A slow day today
Thank you for the response. You did miss a question, though.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Why?

Is this something only scum would do?
avatar
supplementscene: 1. Because Spot 4 on Wagon in the first 24 hours looks scummy and oportunistic

2. He's certain I'm fascist right, are we just letting fascists misslynch here?
1. I'm...not certain I'm reading this correctly. Are you saying that Agent's vote could be town because it wasn't in spot 4?

2. That didn't answer my question.
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
PookaMustard: if we assume one or two scum kickstarted it, all it would have taken is the remaining scum or a reckless Townie to seal the day early.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Could you elaborate some on this?
Sure. If we assume that one or two scum have been present in the early votes, then by bringing the votes on scene to five, all it would take is either the remaining scum to seal the vote, or a reckless Townie and a combo of another Townie or scum to take it there. Basically, I am seeing them banking on the speed of the wagon and hoping that future players just vote the leading wagon as quickly as possible. This is why I was worried about of the wagon and asked blotunga about his vote.

A reckless townie would be someone like dedoporno in #57, who dropped the hammer on...it was Lift, I think. The kind of scum I am thinking of when it comes to votes is someone like HSL, who usually joined at the tail end of the votes (also same game).
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
sofia321: Thank you very much.
Preserving this for the future. In case the spambot post gets deleted and #225 and #228 no longer make sense for future archeologists who dig up this thread in 2077. The "Don't mention it!" made me chuckle.
Posted June 13, 2019
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Could you elaborate some on this?
avatar
PookaMustard: Sure. If we assume that one or two scum have been present in the early votes, then by bringing the votes on scene to five, all it would take is either the remaining scum to seal the vote, or a reckless Townie and a combo of another Townie or scum to take it there. Basically, I am seeing them banking on the speed of the wagon and hoping that future players just vote the leading wagon as quickly as possible. This is why I was worried about of the wagon and asked blotunga about his vote.

A reckless townie would be someone like dedoporno in #57, who dropped the hammer on...it was Lift, I think. The kind of scum I am thinking of when it comes to votes is someone like HSL, who usually joined at the tail end of the votes (also same game).
I'm impressed with your shrewdness.

Of course it hinges on "assumption" now doesn't it??
Pages:
1
10
14
15
16
17
18
30
40
50
60
70
76
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionGOG Mafia #59 - Previously on Mafia...(1130 posts)(1130 posts)
(1130 posts)