It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Rule 4. Please read it if you haven't already. Especially the second part.

No attacks against the person (as opposed to player), please.

Goes for everyone.
avatar
trentonlf: I do find him scummy. Ergo....
Touché

avatar
JoeSapphire: Trent I don't know. I was trying to remember if he got frustrated like post 151 in games where he was mafia.
Is it fair to say you were frustrated with Carr, Trent? Am I misreading?
Good old trentonlf being trentonlf.

avatar
JoeSapphire: Carr seems too assured. But that might be character I'm not sure.
You flatter me.

avatar
GameRager: It still seems like a flimsy reason to vote for someone.
Very true. Pray give me a sturdy reason to vote for anyone at this point, and I likely will be convinced by you.

avatar
dedoporno: Is there someone you do find scummy (other than Trent, since I don't really see someone being the 4th on supposedly Town wagon as a scummy enough read)?
Gogtrial34987 and blotunga are lightly penciled into my scum books, but trentonlf is still my preference.
avatar
GameRager: It still seems like a flimsy reason to vote for someone.
avatar
agentcarr16: Very true. Pray give me a sturdy reason to vote for anyone at this point, and I likely will be convinced by you.
Check post 172 again...I also mention flub and scene are on my radar as well. :)
avatar
blotunga: Likely just 1 max 2.
avatar
dedoporno: Was that before and during your own vote respectively?

I kid, I kid. Or do it?
Is anyone else remembering Joe's comment last game about how one of ZFR, Joe, and whoever wasn't scum? :)

avatar
supplementscene: I was unaware ZFR was attributing randomly
You'd have known if you'd read the setup. Statements like this combined with your insistence that only mafia would (should?) really pay attention to the setup make me wonder if you're aiming for some LAMIST.

avatar
supplementscene: I was unaware ZFR was attributing randomly and it seemed like the set up in his prior game wasn't random.
In his prior game, he specifically started with slightly altered Tragic Brothers (or whatever the role pair is called), then randomized the setup afterward. I don't remember the exact details, and I'm not inclined to go look.

avatar
agentcarr16: Gogtrial34987 and blotunga are lightly penciled into my scum books, but trentonlf is still my preference.
Why, why, and why? You've got some vague declarations with support that would be generous if labeled ephemeral.
avatar
supplementscene:
Questions you didn't answer:

avatar
gogtrial34987: What did you think about Microfish's mod vote in #89?
avatar
gogtrial34987: Side question here: Was your questioning of my motivation in #63 intended as the "accusation" that trent reads it as?
avatar
gogtrial34987: For the record: Did my answer to that question in #65 make sense to you? Any thoughts about it?
avatar
gogtrial34987: You don't find agent suspicious for putting an RVS vote on you when there's already a serious vote on you?
avatar
agentcarr16: Very true. Pray give me a sturdy reason to vote for anyone at this point, and I likely will be convinced by you.
avatar
GameRager: Check post 172 again...I also mention flub and scene are on my radar as well. :)
Why Flub?
avatar
supplementscene: So you initially had a town read of me but after Bookwyrm replied to you saying 'it was mainly frustration vote'
What Bookwyrm actually said:
avatar
gogtrial34987: Is that a frustration vote, or do you see this coming from scum-scene?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Yes.

It's really frustrating, but the last time I saw him saying things that were wildly out of tune with the publicly available setup, he was scum.
The "Yes" question to an "or" question can of course be read either way, and he does use the word "frustrating", but these thing do not equal to him saying that "it was mainly a frustration vote."

avatar
supplementscene: And then SPF and Joe both state 'this is typical Scene town play'.

You then state you read my prior play.
You have the order of things wrong. First (in #74), I say I skimmed your prior play, and then (in #78 and #96 SPF and Joe say they don't see you playing different from your regular town play.

avatar
supplementscene: Really? Am I stearing the conversation towards set up in this game?
What is this a response to?

avatar
supplementscene: And if you read those threads as you say you have can you state how I slipped in them?
Where did I state that you "slipped in them"?
You made bad assumptions about the setup, ignoring publicly available (mod-originated) information. You did so as both town and mafia, though more egregiously as mafia, and more importantly as town you tried to get clarification about the way the setup worked, while you didn't as mafia. I see the same behaviour in this game.

avatar
supplementscene: ALso you claim I 'started very strongly in game 57' - how so I barely posted until Day 2.
In game #57 I found both post #66 and post #102 good, strong, substansive and useful posts. You showed self-awareness and questioned people. Based on those posts, at that point, I would not have voted on you, as I'd have thought you a valuable contribution to the overall set of people trying to figure out the game. However, from memory about that game (this is not something I saw during my skim, as I only looked at your posts, and then only from the first several pages), these posts were also commented upon by several people, who wondered if it was a scum-tell, as it differed from your usual play.

avatar
supplementscene: Are you sure you actually read these games
I didn't read those games. I skimmed your posts from the first couple of pages of those games.

I really wish that mischaracterising things that were said previously would be AI for you; it would make all of this so much easier.

avatar
supplementscene: Now I don't think for a moment 4 Mafia and SK players can all be on a town wagon on Day 1. Personally if I was Mafia I'd want to stay off a town wagon and even jump off. But I think at least 1 of those players is dirty, maybe 2.
Honestly, if you're town, it wouldn't surprise me if your wagon was all-town. I can easily see scum just sitting back, predicting that you'll practically self-lynch.
(If you're scum, then I give high odds to agentcarr being your buddy, hopping on with an RVS vote in order to help slow down your wagon at a later point with some excuse.)
avatar
GameRager: Check post 172 again...I also mention flub and scene are on my radar as well. :)
avatar
supplementscene: Why Flub?
Re-read that post...I explain it with questions in reply to their post.
avatar
supplementscene: I never read OP regardless of alignment but I've skimmed OP since and don't believe the statement about random draw is there.
Boi. Did you at least read your own PM? Are you sure you are who you think you are?


avatar
trentonlf: I’m not going to get into it with you again. You’re a self centered individual that I don’t like playing with. For this game I find your play scummy and I’ve stated why.
Let me ask you something. Given that scene and you aren't exactly BFFs and his whole "thing", how much of your suspicion towards him do you think is biased? How certain are you that you aren't just finding scumminess (that's a real word, read a book!) only because you expect to find it in him? I'm not defending him, I just want to know how much you are sold on this and how much is based on personal feelings.


avatar
GameRager: This is odd...why would a townie want to be lynched and possibly help his fellow players lose? :\
A Townie wouldn't want to be lynched but would sure want to get lunched. Free meal is the best meal.


avatar
Bookwyrm627: Is anyone else remembering Joe's comment last game about how one of ZFR, Joe, and whoever wasn't scum? :)
I was about to bring that up after something Joe said in this game but then I forgot. Can't really remember what he said.

Where am I?!


avatar
gogtrial34987: Honestly, if you're town, it wouldn't surprise me if your wagon was all-town. I can easily see scum just sitting back, predicting that you'll practically self-lynch.
This is the most annoying bit of all - the likeliness of this happening. I have PTSD from such things in the past...
avatar
supplementscene:
avatar
gogtrial34987: Questions you didn't answer:

avatar
gogtrial34987: You don't find agent suspicious for putting an RVS vote on you when there's already a serious vote on you?
avatar
gogtrial34987:
1. RE: Microfish. I'm finding Microfishes generally participation to be far less than his first game. This is more of a concern for me at this stage. I know he's had enough time to play another similar game we've been playing together, so I question why he hasn't engaged. This is more telling for me than a vote on ZFR and I'm hoping he comes in with some heavy posts soon.

2. I thought it was quite obvious it was an accusation yes it was. Didn't I answer this? If I didn't I think you'll find I incite far more questions than any other player

3. Your response made perfect sense. My issue is that Mafia player I've played alongside used questioning adeptly to direct conversation, direct blame a

4. When did I say I didn't find Agent suspicious. If you've followed my posts on here you'd see I stated he was. However he's only second on the chain so he drops down the order
avatar
flubbucket: Was waiting for this...=D
avatar
agentcarr16: I like you.
Both of you just skip completely over my posts, don't you? :'(

avatar
JoeSapphire: My read on supplementscene's wagon: supplementscene said some stuff that doesn't make sense and a bunch of people found that frustrating or weird and voted for him.
Please reread the actual reasons for voting from Bookwyrm, me, and trent.
Would you still characterize our reasons for voting him as "finding it frustrating or weird that scene said some stuff that doesn't make sense"?

avatar
agentcarr16: As for trentonlf, votes 3-4 are pivotal and I like his less than I like gogtrial34987's.
avatar
trentonlf: So you vote me because I was the fourth vote on Scene’s wagon? I find him to be scummy and voted him, it’s the same thing I would do for anyone else I found to be scummy. Is there a reason you are trying to make Scene’s wagon look like a townie being lynched? I mean why else would you be trying to insinuate that vote positions on someone’s wagon matter at this point.
Hmm, how "common" is the belief that you can tell scum from their position on a wagon? I know scene's always on about it, and I've seen it come up maybe a handful of times since I started playing, but it just feels so out-there WIFOM and situational to me...
@agentcarr: Could you name any instances where you remember scum successfully being found due to looking at wagon positions?

avatar
flubbucket: I wholeheartedly support this action.
avatar
GameRager: This is odd...why would a townie want to be lynched and possibly help his fellow players lose? :\
Sadly asking to be lynched and giving an appearance of not enjoying the game at all are standard features for flub, regardless of alignment. Our antics appear to bore him, presumably due to them not being anticsy enough. He keeps coming back for more, though, so we must be better than the alternative!
(Also, he can at times be helpful in the end game.)

avatar
trentonlf: I think it’s intentional
Truly?
avatar
GameRager: This is odd...why would a townie want to be lynched and possibly help his fellow players lose? :\
avatar
gogtrial34987: Sadly asking to be lynched and giving an appearance of not enjoying the game at all are standard features for flub, regardless of alignment. Our antics appear to bore him, presumably due to them not being anticsy enough. He keeps coming back for more, though, so we must be better than the alternative!
(Also, he can at times be helpful in the end game.)
Sounds good/thanks for the info. :)

Well then he's off my radar...for now anyways.
avatar
GameRager: Well then he's off my radar...for now anyways.
Why? No one should be off your radar just because someone else told you whatever. This is a game of lies and deception. Trust only your self-verified information fully.
avatar
supplementscene: I never read OP regardless of alignment
This is starting to mildly annoy me as well. ZFR stated in the sign up thread and the OP of the game that the game is C9++ with no twists and a link to what C9++ is. We all miss things sometimes, I get it (I missed some stuff in the last game). When people point out what you've missed though, the least you can do is pay attention to that rather than plough on in wilful ignorance.
As many people have explained to you many times now, the setup is randomised. There might be a serial killer, but whether there is or isn't was decided by dice rolls.

avatar
supplementscene: I was unaware ZFR was attributing randomly
I explained exactly this to you on the first bloody page.
avatar
supplementscene: So you initially had a town read of me but after Bookwyrm replied to you saying 'it was mainly frustration vote'
avatar
gogtrial34987: What Bookwyrm actually said:
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Yes.

It's really frustrating, but the last time I saw him saying things that were wildly out of tune with the publicly available setup, he was scum.
avatar
gogtrial34987: The "Yes" question to an "or" question can of course be read either way, and he does use the word "frustrating", but these thing do not equal to him saying that "it was mainly a frustration vote."

avatar
supplementscene: And then SPF and Joe both state 'this is typical Scene town play'.

You then state you read my prior play.
avatar
gogtrial34987: You have the order of things wrong. First (in #74), I say I skimmed your prior play, and then (in #78 and #96 SPF and Joe say they don't see you playing different from your regular town play.

avatar
supplementscene: Really? Am I stearing the conversation towards set up in this game?
avatar
gogtrial34987: What is this a response to?

avatar
supplementscene: And if you read those threads as you say you have can you state how I slipped in them?
avatar
gogtrial34987: Where did I state that you "slipped in them"?
You made bad assumptions about the setup, ignoring publicly available (mod-originated) information. You did so as both town and mafia, though more egregiously as mafia, and more importantly as town you tried to get clarification about the way the setup worked, while you didn't as mafia. I see the same behaviour in this game.

avatar
supplementscene: ALso you claim I 'started very strongly in game 57' - how so I barely posted until Day 2.
avatar
gogtrial34987: In game #57 I found both post #66 and post #102 good, strong, substansive and useful posts. You showed self-awareness and questioned people. Based on those posts, at that point, I would not have voted on you, as I'd have thought you a valuable contribution to the overall set of people trying to figure out the game. However, from memory about that game (this is not something I saw during my skim, as I only looked at your posts, and then only from the first several pages), these posts were also commented upon by several people, who wondered if it was a scum-tell, as it differed from your usual play.

avatar
supplementscene: Are you sure you actually read these games
avatar
gogtrial34987: I didn't read those games. I skimmed your posts from the first couple of pages of those games.

I really wish that mischaracterising things that were said previously would be AI for you; it would make all of this so much easier.

avatar
supplementscene: Now I don't think for a moment 4 Mafia and SK players can all be on a town wagon on Day 1. Personally if I was Mafia I'd want to stay off a town wagon and even jump off. But I think at least 1 of those players is dirty, maybe 2.
avatar
gogtrial34987: Honestly, if you're town, it wouldn't surprise me if your wagon was all-town. I can easily see scum just sitting back, predicting that you'll practically self-lynch.
(If you're scum, then I give high odds to agentcarr being your buddy, hopping on with an RVS vote in order to help slow down your wagon at a later point with some excuse.)
You didn't say I slipped in either game but I did slip in different ways and you don't note this. Several Town and Mafia players felt I fucked up early in both games where I played as Mafia. It had nothing to do with game setup though. But as you said you skimread the games then perhaps if you are Town you didn't note that.

As I mentioned to another player I never read the OP, I may skim it, but generally I just get on and focus on what players are saying.

As for my wagon being all town.....well you would say that if you were Mafia wouldn't you? But I can see I certainly have made Town players suspicious because while I have had 5 players on my wagon, I've also had at least 2 other players suspicious of me. Which makes a total of 7 game players.

But I still think spots 3, 4, 5 on any Town wagon are highly irresistible for the mafia player