I'll respond to Gogtrial first, then I'll get to Pooka's posts. This is part 1 for Gogtrial.
gogtrial34987: I think dedo was deliberately aiming for a wrong derpclear, based on making the same mistake with the way mechanics work as he'd made before.
I'm...not seeing it. To me, this looks like a mistake in counting the letter combinations, not a mistake in figuring out the probability of a particular letter appearing. Two different things.
Also, I don't see Dedo deliberately going for a derpclear by bussing his buddy on spur of the moment at MyLo. It just doesn't jive with my feel for how he plays. I've already mentioned how I don't think scum could have anticipated Micro shooting Joe.
Nor do I see Flub and Dedo trying to feel each other out to see who might counter claim. Both are experienced players, and if either of them thought they had a good chance with a CC, then they would just do it. The other would play off it from there.
gogtrial34987: probably quite safe in the knowledge that the flaw in the reasoning would be pointed out, for cheap and effective distancing
Not very effective when I'm the only one that seems to have bought it as distancing. :)
gogtrial34987: ping 1: "when you don't know the town PR's".
Mafia from the very start of the day has known for certain that there was only the 1-shot vig left, as they know from their own composition how many PR dice slots were left to be filled. That's not the sort of thing Bookwyrm overlooks.
Ouch, good catch. When looking at that, I flipped back to my headspace of when they were making the claims, where I didn't know how the ?? in the letter string would play out.
I claim excellence, not perfection. I suspect you'll understand a lack of perfection, considering the paragraph of 879 and then 880. :P
gogtrial34987: ping 2: by replacing himself with "TOWN", he obscures his position on the wagons. For those of us who don't keep their own notes, it might seem awfully tempting to just go with these wagons.
*snort* This is weak, Gogtrial. I specifically pointed out that I replaced my name, and I noted my source if someone wanted to put my name back in there. I replaced my name to help demonstrate my point, and people that weren't sure of my towniness were fully informed (upfront!) about my process before they even got to the wagons.
For fun, don't forget, when doing your wagon
position analysis, that the EOD wagons don't always tell the whole story. By way of example, in this specific game I was in spot one on that D2 wagon for a significant period, until I finally hopped off in the last hours before coming back to hammer. :P
gogtrial34987: ping 3: Joe also followed up with "oh yeah, there was the whole D1 scene wagon speed thing!" (paraphrased), and then made Pooka one of his strongest town reads. Bookwyrm fails to note this.
*shrug* I'll grant you this one. A quick scan indicates I didn't make any comment about agreeing with Joe on Pooka not really standing out as town in his 755 or his 761, so I have no evidence of that.
I didn't comment on Joe following up with a town read on Pooka because 1) I haven't been town reading Pooka, and 2) I wasn't impressed with his reason for town reading Pooka.
gogtrial34987: ping 4: framing. This is how you win as scum (I've learned through happy experience). You drive the narrative while giving town a seemingly valid choice to pursue and argue about.
This is also how you put forward argument as a townie, so other townies can see why you think such and such are scum.
Sort of the way you're currently presenting reasons that I'm scum. :P
gogtrial34987: @Bookwyrm: If you're mafia, you've underestimated how certain I am of Pooka being town, and that's going to cost you dearly. (Actually, you made me seriously doubt, and had me buying into the narrative. But then I went back to D1, and yep, I'm as certain about Pooka as I was about GameRager.)
Then I guess town loses, because we aren't going to be able to form a consensus vote on the final scum.
gogtrial34987: This was Pooka, at the start of his 3rd (effectively 2nd) mafia game. D1, so completely uncoached by fellow mafia. If he's mafia, does he really go and reread 278 posts to keep copious notes about stuff which totally doesn't matter in the big scheme of things? I simply can not see that behaviour and that effort from mafia; only from inexperienced town.
You note that he's made the effort, therefore he's
capable of the effort.
Would first time mafia (thus, inexperienced) put in the effort? If they are inclined to be a lazy player, then maybe not. If they are inclined toward effort, then they
absolutely could put in the effort.
Unless your argument is that town!Pooka would not be able to see that these things don't matter, while scum!Pooka would know that they don't matter?
gogtrial34987: Again, does an uncoached new player manage to be
that effective as mafia?
I dunno, can
first time mafia be effective?
Assuming you're town, you're seeing Pooka complaining about a wagon that has
at best 2 (unrelated) scum on it (wyrm and agent). But pretend Pooka is mafia for a moment, and you're seeing Pooka saying a 5 vote wagon,
with zero mafia votes, is really fishy. "Oh noez, a wagon on a townie got going really fast! Must be scum in them there votes!"
And then later on D1, Pooka was okay with lynching Scene. The only wagon difference was Agent (not mafia) got off the wagon and GR (also not mafia) got on. Pooka was cool with making Scene a 5-vote wagon in that instance.
gogtrial34987: Bookwyrm needed urgently to provide an alternative. He couldn't list "Pooka and flub" as the team, because we'd opt for flub over Pooka. By setting up the dichotomy, he's making Pooka the safe choice to vote for. And hey, Flub is going along.
Wot the 'ell, mate? I specifically said I wanted to lynch Pooka and Flub as my picks for scum team, and I even said which order I wanted to lynch them.
Are you trying to tell me that this was our master plan?
N3 chat.
Wyrm: "What we going to do tonight, Flub?"
Flub: "Same thing we do every night, Wyrm. Fail to kill town!"
Wyrm: "What if we actually succeed tonight, Flub?"
Flub: "Huh. How about this. You afk for less than a day, and I'll vote you for it. That will show we aren't teammates!"
Wyrm: "Great idea! For more fun, lets make up some disagreement about flavour, and you can use that as evidence too!"
Flub: "Good choice. Lets try to lynch one of the inexperienced players."
Wyrm: "Yes! I'll put you as my second pick for scum and offer town the choice of the two of you. They'll definitely go for the other guy!"
Flub: "Good, good. Who shall we fail to kill?"
Wyrm: "Hm. I know, lets go for Trent. He's been hard reading me as town since forever."
Flub: "Joe has become suspicious of you, so we'll leave him alone. We'll also leave everyone that suspects me alone."
Wyrm: "Hooray hooray!"
gogtrial34987: Maybe with SPF's loss, the Bookwyrm-dedo team decided to just live or die together.
Yo Dedo, is there any chance at all that you wouldn't throw my ass under the bus if such a throw meant scum would win?
-----
Bookwyrm627: Every townie has a 50% chance of hitting scum if they just vote randomly among the eligible players.
gogtrial34987: This is true, but of course, we need to hit correctly twice in a row, so random voting only gives us a 25% chance of winning. I can see this as mafia!wyrm trying to make us somewhat complacent.
I wasn't the first to mention the 50% chance. No scum ping
for Dedo?