HypersomniacLive: Is town expected not to self-pres, and why?
And?
Sure, a certain amount of self preservation is expected but it sounded like ZFR was making excuses.
As for flub, I read his post as more of a general attempt to avoid last minute chaos. While the rules in this particular game mean that we avoid our usual EoD1 fiasco resulting in a no-lynch, it brings its own potential for chaos.
I still really read ZFR's reasoning as "anyone but me".
ZFR: Finished rereading.
OK, Town points for flub. I don't see you adding a second mafia vote on my wagon so early.
Interesting. While I can see how you'd think the two votes are unlikely to be MM, you don't think MT or even TT is remotely possible?
My vote is very much a continuation of the position I held yesterday, reinforced by our exchange today. But I suppose the same could be said of your vote for me.
Honestly, I don't see much changing from further interactions between us and I'm aware of my tendency to tunnel. With that in mind I'll leave my vote on you and look at other players.
Ixamyakxim: And am I the only one happy about Joe's flip after the non-claim? I mean I "assume" he was around to do it, but the wagon went fast at the end when we got close to end of day and I guess he could have missed his chance.
Aha, Ix! I was wondering why you plonked your vote on Joe 2 days before the deadline and then seemingly disappeared?
bler144: As for flub going at ZFR, I don't think he's responding to what ZFR did at the time, he's responding to ZFR's ex post facto framing of it. I don't see anything factually wrong with what ZFR said - my guess is it's something in the tone, or probably more likely the fact the ZFR felt a need to excuse himself by even bringing it up unprompted.
Actually, I'd say this is closer to my problem with ZFR than whatever you think I'm nuts for thinking. Perhaps I haven't been expressing myself well...
flubbucket: Have mercy.......
Unvote: ZFR Vote: Ixamyakxim Ok, interesting. Can you elaborate?
ZFR: OK, fair enough. I wanted to contrast SPF's (honestly stupid) hypothesis for the reason for my vote-hopping with the real reason for my vote-hopping, but I suppose it did come as LAMIST.
You sure went to a lot of effort to counter something that was stupid. I'm not sure why you felt so threatened. :P