It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ZFR: No it doesn't. If I prefer a flu over three broken limbs it doesn't mean I'm ok with flu.

A lynch was happening, Lift made sure of that, and I know I'm town. I prefer a Joe or anyone else's lynch over mine. Hey, I'd have loved you to be on the receiving end, but it wasn't happening.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Just want to make sure I'm understanding that analogy correctly - Joe's is flu and your lynch would be the three broken limbs?
The analogy was just to show that "I prefer X over Y" isn't same as "I'm okay with X."

I voted Joe over you because I didn't want to get lynched. And you reply that it means I " was basically ok with any lynch as long as it wasn't you." er... that's not the same by far. You're just (purposely?) twisting my words.

If there was any chance you could have been lynched I'd have voted you over Joe. You were at 0 votes day of the deadline.
avatar
muddysneakers: Agent, what are these Joe scumtells Flub saw that you are referring to?
Well, apparently they weren't scumtells.

But likely the same ones that I didn't see until later in the day.

1. The RVS vote in post 101.

2. The "TRUFAX - Mafia" claim in post 104.

3. The odd "actual" vote in post 106.

avatar
ZFR: I voted Joe over you because I didn't want to get lynched. And you reply that it means I " was basically ok with any lynch as long as it wasn't you." er... that's not the same by far. You're just (purposely?) twisting my words.
Really? "that's not the same by far"?? I read:
avatar
ZFR: I prefer a Joe or anyone else's lynch over mine.
to mean that you were basically OK with anyone else's lynch over yours. Please explain how that's not the same thing.
avatar
ZFR: The analogy was just to show that "I prefer X over Y" isn't same as "I'm okay with X."
Ok, but what you're saying is that you preferred lynching Joe over getting lynched yourself, but that doesn't mean you were ok with lynching Joe? You were just making the best of a bad situation, picking the lesser of two evils?

Hopefully you see the problem with that. Your explanation still suggests that you didn't consider Joe a good lynch and did it purely out of self preservation.

Vote ZFR
avatar
SirPrimalform: Hopefully you see the problem with that. Your explanation still suggests that you didn't consider Joe a good lynch and did it purely out of self preservation.
SPF, what do you make of flub saying something similar in post 232? ZFR did it for self preservation but flub said it and had no threat of lynch. What do you make of that?

avatar
flubbucket: My view has swayed a bit because Joe's post #193 & 195 were thoughtful and concise. However, I can't see changing the lynch target at this juncture as pro-town.
flub, any comments on why this is different than ZFR?
avatar
muddysneakers: SPF, what do you make of flub saying something similar in post 232? ZFR did it for self preservation but flub said it and had no threat of lynch. What do you make of that?

flub, any comments on why this is different than ZFR?
I'd like to hear from flub before commenting on that, don't want to put excuses in his mouth. :p
avatar
muddysneakers: SPF, what do you make of flub saying something similar in post 232? ZFR did it for self preservation but flub said it and had no threat of lynch. What do you make of that?

flub, any comments on why this is different than ZFR?
avatar
SirPrimalform: I'd like to hear from flub before commenting on that, don't want to put excuses in his mouth. :p
Do you want to change your vote to flub?
avatar
muddysneakers: Do you want to change your vote to flub?
Not at this moment. I'd like to hear more from flub though.
avatar
muddysneakers: ...................

Flub, what are these Joe scumtells Agent thought you made?

...................
Attempting to read agentcarr16's mind.......


I got zippo.


avatar
muddysneakers: ..............
flub, any comments on why this is different than ZFR?
As you remember, we were knee deep in Phase Two.

Would moving or attempting to get another wagon rolling at the last minute be pro-town?? What if we'd ended up with two equal wagons??

Very "different" than ZFR.
So: full disclosure. I had some hint this NK was possible, since Lift kept contacting me over the course of N1 on my stance in ways he wouldn't have needed to if it were moot. He didn't say anything beyond that that tells me anything you all don't know. We talked some theory.

Anything else there is discussion for post-game, perhaps.

In practical reality this meant I didn't invest time reading much. I started an old tv series that was years overdue (hint: it's not Prime Suspect). Tried to relax, though not entirely with success.

I did think about the "game" quite a bit the past few days, and realized something interesting I hadn't seen mentioned/considered that ran counter to my own assumptions and I think is important - though perhaps others had already figured it out and just didn't see it as noteworthy.

ZFR said something I thought at first might hint at that, but when I looked closer that wasn't actually what he was saying, I don't think.

Based on how I recollect D1 overall and a few quick fact checks just now:

Lean town bundle:
zfr
cristi

Logical premise: If zfr is not town in this game, he's an idiot. Since he's not an idiot, town.

Town to neutral pro-town:
flub
HSL


I will try to re-read those 4 as well, but for now I don't see voting anywhere there. Everyone else I think is straight back in the mix.

Part 1 (cutting the WOT for people who don't like them - bump please?)
- Wall-of-text bump -
avatar
muddysneakers: ...................

Flub, what are these Joe scumtells Agent thought you made?

...................
avatar
flubbucket: Attempting to read agentcarr16's mind.......

I got zippo.
Fair. What are the scumtells Joe made?
wall-of-text thanks!

avatar
muddysneakers: 1. Who was cristi possibly buddying? Anyone still alive want to take a stab at that?

Regardless I like flub or agent here.

2. I'll go with agent since his wagon might go somewhere.
1) Not trying to dig out old battles, but I don't take that particular question with any seriousness. It's not like he pointed to specific instances and said "this looks like buddying!" he just said, "hey, I'm not willing to town-read her, someone go find some buddying, maybe?!" We all do that sometimes, so I'm really not trying to make him feel bad, but it's just generally not productive either.

Your earlier concerns about me and cristi are valid, certainly - esp. for a player who wouldn't know either of us at all. Do you have questions about specific interactions (or things we've said) or are you just thinking out loud?

The short version imo is that you're in the correct area, roughly. IMO we have similar views on what constitutes "proper town" play (making reads lists, voting, e.g.) as well as some overlap in what we view as specifically wolfy, though from my POV I wouldn't expect the bulk of our reads to overlap in the middle, but more likely than not at the extremities.

The way I describe cristi normally on D1 is that "she sorts over time." Ergo, there's never any reason, barring an obvious slip, to lynch her D1. Sometimes she's too quiet or pings in a way that merits a push for her to step up.

If she IS active, she's too valuable if town to just lynch on a whim (she can solve, is highly likely to soak NK if not wolf), and if you actually push/engage her, her playstyle raises the degree of difficulty. I haven't done much pushing of her here both because she's been reasonably active, nothing pings at all, and you know, I was a bit distracted.

Doesn't mean she won't fool me, certainly. And in that D1, town waited too long to do anything coherent, so there's not much solid to read against. I'll spare you the discussion on deep wolves.

Compare her reads list to Joe's, for example (not trying to pick on the dead, but...he is an exemplar here). She tends to at least try to sort people as town / non-town (ZFR was the only null, IIRC?), and to give some reason. If she's scum, she either has to pressure teammates based on actual reads and hope it doesn't bite, or fake those reads, and then it's much harder (on average) to justify them shifting to suit maf interests in that moment vs. legit reads.

So, ask her questions. Watch her reads lists. If X goes from lean town to scum on her vote or her lists, look at her reasons. She tends to lay it out, so if it feels like there's a gap in the progression, push. It's not to say she CAN'T be lying, but it's much harder for her than for someone who makes a reads list but it says "IDK, maybe" who can go from scum to town and back without having to contradict anything they said.

But, I'm legit reading her as town at this point, I'd say lean town in an absolute, strong town relative to the field.

I think the one thing that stands out is that she stayed on agent as long as she did, vs. say, jumping to P1na, or ZFR, or anything that might create info from a counter-wagon, but she did give A reason for it as I recall, so when I re-read having seen the flips, I'll look more care with new info in mind.

I would tend to assume she (having seen my scum game) is legit reading me as town, or if maf, I suppose, knows I'm town/neutral and doesn't have to fake much, but is looking at the same type of markers - albeit I put out a lot more text to read/sort - and knows cracks will show if she's patient.


2. Just to clarify, since I raised an eyebrow on this on first pass, but think I probably misunderstood in the context of D2 - you're not overlooking the fact that flub already has a vote on him D2 (ergo, 2 votes would have at least started a wagon vs. placing a first vote), but this quote is assuming that cristi's D1 read and potentially mine are still in play?

Do you assume that?
Why, specifically do you "like" in flub at this point in D2?
Why, specifically do you "like" in agent at this point?


avatar
bler144: No one besides agent/I is eyeballing scene that I can see. It's not even worth re-reading agent to see if it's worth weighing rejoining cristi at that point because no one else besides the two of us seemed to be eyeballing him at that point (ok, well, and scene, but that appears to be 100% OMGUS I want no part of), unless I missed it.
avatar
muddysneakers: You missed it. I've been trying to get a straight answer out of agent for a few posts now.
I actually need to re-read everybody at this point, so yes, it's possible (and in fact, probable) I missed something significant. But in response to your specific answer I would say "trying to get answers out of" is not the same as "clearly expressed an interest to vote for."

IYO, did you clearly express an interest in voting agent previously? Or were you just musing and hoped other players would interpret that?

SPF vs. ZFR squabble appears to be the main action, but nothing jumps out at me in it either way.

I wrote this like an hour ago and had to go deal with a crying child, but it doesn't appear anything has changed in that time.
avatar
ZFR: I prefer a Joe or anyone else's lynch over mine.
avatar
agentcarr16: to mean that you were basically OK with anyone else's lynch over yours. Please explain how that's not the same thing.
It means I "preferred anyone else's lynch over mine". "Preferred" doesn't equal to "be OK with". And this is the last time I'm arguing these symantics; If you thing these phrases are synonymous I've got nothing more to add.

Yes, I'm 100% sure I'm town and for everyone else the probability is less than 100%. Ergo I prefer anyone else's over mine.
avatar
P1na: Who again "conveniently" was the first voter for our dead townie, Joe (may he rest in peace).
It didn't seem all that convenient for Joe.
avatar
bler144: 1. Your earlier concerns about me and cristi are valid, certainly - esp. for a player who wouldn't know either of us at all. Do you have questions about specific interactions (or things we've said) or are you just thinking out loud?
1. Mostly just thinking out loud. I just think it is a little interesting and pretty convenient for the two of you. That being said I definitely don't think you're both scum and something strange would have to happen for me to vote either of you toDay.