supplementscene: I had to google, OMGUS.....But yea when you're wrongly accused you have to analyse whether the reasoning for the accusation makes sense or if it's an aggressive misslynch. The person with the most to gain from that is a Neutral Lyncher. Hence my theory. But in reality the Neutral Lyncher may well be sitting back playing a more conservative waiting game. You may well be town scumhunting.
You really should think about it more, since you seem to have missed the point and the significance why OMGUS has it's own acronym that shows up over and over and can be googled and has its own wiki page and everything. I'm not trying to be a jerk here. You're just way overvaluing yourself and town!your narrow slice of the game. Or your non-town being deliberately obtuse.
As a practical matter, depending on how D1 goes, wolves often have less incentive to do any pushing than town do. They already have information. No lynch D1 isn't ideal for mafia, but it's not particularly bad for them in most setups, in part because it is - more often than not, though unlike the crowd I don't think it's always true - bad for town.
Considering you only yielded two actual votes and Joe wishy-washying, there may be literally no wolves at all on town!you. They could well have been waiting for a 3rd or maybe even 4th vote before clamping down.
supplementscene: No she hasn't from my recollection (and this is lazy because I'm not re-reading right now). T
Oh wait I see she's just done some reads after you replied to this..........and everyone is town ;)
1. Fair...ish? If wrong.
2. False. Even assuming you had not, for whatever reason seen posts 224/225, in 222 (which you acknowledge seeing) she said:
cristigale: Hyper - yada yada
For that reason, I have him squarely null. Null is not town. It's also clearly only a partial list, so one would presume she was not done, not that she magically thinks everyone is town.
supplementscene: For the record Bler was the first to move wagon and take Joe up to 3 votes. Back then either of the other wagons of 2 votes could have caught Joe up, now they can not. Bler finishes his Vote for Joe post with this as if to say 'this isn't my real vote, don't blame me when he shows up town/neutral':
Sigh. You piss me off. I'm sorry. You do.
That is absolutely not what I said. You are either misrepping deliberately or you simply don't comprehend.
Ironically, it is closer to what flub said in the post immediately proceeding yours, so...perhaps you've confused the two of us? I mean, sure, that happens all the time because our playstyles and posts are quite similar. HSL was just asking me why I said that Joe was "delicious." I get it.
Though even if you'd said it to flub I would thought it was a cheap shot. He's sticking with his vote (as am I) and knows he'll be judged on that. Whereas you are hemming and hawing, and don't look great for it no matter how Joe flips.
If Joe flips maf, this
supplementscene: Is anyone considering shifting wagons or is Joe everyones second favourite lynch? I've adjusted Lift's numbers, from vote changes since then:
in particular looks bad, perhaps looking to seize on a few people expressing ambivalence to divert wagons on a buddy.
HypersomniacLive: 1. The question then is - why didn't you poke flubbucket?
2. It disappoints and saddens me that you think that I, of all people, am trying to re-stir the pot, let alone for an in-game purpose/agenda.
2a. I'm only trying to understand where you stand on both of them, and why you'd prefer supplementscene over JoeSapphire.
- In your posts to/about supplementscene you've gone through the whole spectrum of possible alignments, and motives for wanting him lynched, and I'm sorry to say that the prevailing stance at the end seems to be "the clash is so intense, I simply can't play with this person".
- In your post #165, you express some valid concerns, see parallels to his last game (where he wasn't actually mafia, and wasn't playing to the mafia's team win-condition, and it's confusing you're seeing it that way), but also make arguments as to why all of what JoeSapphire had done up until then could be NAI. And then preface your vote with the bit I quoted. And after labelling (again) my question as nitpicking, comes your post #219.
So yeah, sorry if I'm supposed to have a clear picture what your stance regarding their alignment is, and what your reasons for preferring one over the other. I don't, hence my inquiries.
I'm also sorry if you feel this all is pointless since you've decided to sub out, but I was left with the impression that you are playing the game until you're actually out.
3. Any particular reason you're referring to me in the third person while directly addressing me? Or did you mean someone else and mistyped?
1/3 and part of 2. I'm really trying to be in the game, but it waxes and wanes. Ironically the reason I was gone all day yesterday is I was in an "investigative techniques" seminar, and one of the things they covered is that you should never do a formal investigative interview within 2 sleep cycles of someone experiencing intense stress because the various hormones people produce (oxytocin, opiods, cortisol, etc) in response to stress haven't fully reset and that impacts the memory and assessment.
Here it's probably 48 hours since I flipped my shit on him, but he seriously keeps retriggering me. I'm really trying to get clear of what is anger and what part is rationality and straight "play the game" with independent judgment, and I simply can't do it. Because Joe is in that sphere around scene, that's somewhat tainted as well.
Scene posts that shit above and I'm beyond mad all over again. That's God's 100% honest truth. I'm really sorry.
If you ask me to respond to something he said and analyze it, I can probably do that. If you ask me how I feel, man, can of worms.
This is, for the record, related to why, if scene is town here (which, fuck knows) scene clearly doesn't understand OMGUS. If you're focused on yourself, or having an emotional reaction - which people calling you scum or misrepping you will trigger for some, regardless of the OP's purpose, you can do your damnedest to be rational, but you're probably going to fail and be inconsistent, or focus on the wrong things, or whatever your delusion is.
"Surely town would never do ____ to me because I know I'm town!" is just a flawed proposition out of the gate. So one is better off NOT focusing on "why is X saying blahblahblah about MEEEEE" unless you're put in a position of having to play defense (as Joe was - you never really were objectively in that gamestate) and focus on what Y is doing elsewhere.
For the rest of your/HSL's #2., that's fair. At this point all I can try and do is lay out that scene is full of himself, or full of crap, or both. Y'all get to decide what to do with that.
Joe hasn't claimed and isn't here. I'm gone.
@HSL - love to you. I have no hard feelings.