Sorry all for the long absence. This was mostly real life, but also a little bit deliberate. I actually managed to look in a few times early today, and worked a bit on my reread (still too much to go to draw/share conclusions), but I basically wanted my four remaining suspects to all have had sufficient chance to weigh in and question us before saying anything more. It 'helps' there that Joe's internet situation is so dire. >.<
Bookwyrm627: The Mason/Lover claim makes my head hurt.
Can you elaborate what about it makes your head hurt?
Bookwyrm627: Looking at it from a mechanics stand-point (one of the things I like to thing I'm better at), replacing Masons with Lovers obviously hurts town.
Something I discussed with Joe early on was that Mafia gets exactly the same amount of power in 7T vs 5T, and in 2T vs 0T, while in both cases town gets an additional power. Since we might be in the 0T scenario, could we just be a reduced "additional power"? Our day-chat is a bit better for town than the regular night-chat which Masons get according to the setup document.
Best case to hope for is that mafia also received some limitation on its powers - but eh, best not to think we'll be so lucky.
Bookwyrm627: Gogtrial and JoeS: What is your actual role name? What do you know about your power set? I'm looking for a full reveal here, doubly so since you didn't leave much in the way of breadcrumbs.
I think we already revealed it all last night. I'm Jorji Costava, Town Sibling. My power is to have day-chat with my big brother, Joe, who I know to be Town. If one of us dies, so does the other. This also goes for mod-kills. (That bit I think is new; FWIW, this was not stated in the initial PM, but in the clarification ZFR gave in the opening post in the QT.) My win condition is identical to what ZFR gave as the example in post1.
I'm interested what of the above you didn't trust enough from our reveal yesterday that you were stalled completely on getting it confirmed again. (I hope you at least took this time for rereads?)
HypersomniacLive: @gogtrial34987 and post #834, for now - heh.
I always like it when you say "Heh". It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy, and vaguely convinced that I said something smart, even if half the time I can't quite point to what that smart thing could've been.
Bookwyrm627: Also, it feels kind of awkward on this end to be dragging up posts from 5-10 pages (for me) back to answer them, as if I'm dragging up old history to hash over again.
For whatever it's worth, I never have any trouble with this being "awkward", and from the surface of it, neither does HSL. I like your tack on seeing who still cares about what, though. Given that by my count, you got exactly zero questions dragged up so far, what does that tell you?
Vitek: That would leave each one with 4 suspects for 2 mafia.
For me it's Bookwyrm, HSL, trenton and SPF.
Let's indeed take SPF off the table, so you're only looking at Bookwyrm, HSL and trent. Now, gun to your head, imagining we're five minutes away from EoD in a lylo situation, name one mafia, one town?
@Bookwyrm, @HSL, @trent: same question for you for the other three?
(Or if you want to make a case for why SPF should be on the table as mafia after all, I'm still listening.)
If I'm right, and I don't see how I can't be, each of the two townies amongst you has a 67% chance of correctly hitting mafia.
Vitek: Trial claims it was because they ddin't want to give away their masonry but from what I know of masons, they, unlike scumbuddies, usually townread each other and there is not much need for listing each other as possible scum.
I've been plain mason once before in #52 (replacing Sage), and there I also distanced from ZFR and mchack (though to be accurate, it mostly was mchack and ZFR who basically won the game through successful distancing, and I just faffed about in the margins a bit). I don't recall having been in any other game with masons (nor observed one), so I just played this based on that experience and general gut feeling. I discussed the basic concept a bit with Joe on D1, but that didn't go beyond "let's keep some distance so scum won't recognize us as possible masons" (paraphrased). He never brought up "usual" mason strategy.
Vitek: but also both acted like it should be quite obvious who their partner when they were claiming.
I think you're referring to Joe's "guess who?" from #746 followed by "That's right it's gogtrial" in #748? That's because I'd given a whopper of a hint about that reveal coming up, right before in
#745: "Well, the twist in this game hadn't been revealed yet, so I should be keeping it in mind as an option. But, eh, that'll have run its course now. Go ahead, bro!" (Joe had asked for me to put in something for him to point to in case I had to suddenly disappear due to real life (which was a serious risk at that point in time) and couldn't immediately confirm his claim.)
Neither of us would've believed that anyone could've figured out the connection before that.
Vitek: Because each night I am told by ZFR about some dream I can't remember well and I wondered if perhaps it could somehow mean I was being roleblocked.
I never got a chance to reply to this last night; I have dreams each night, but it's all described in a few words / phrases; nothing about if I can remember them well. All the phrases seem related to Baldur's Gate, almost certainly due to my avatar.
Vitek: Wasn't it said in the past that Wyrm can't be buddy with scene, only SK?
If so, why?
Iirc the why was the way he voted for scene at the end of D1; mafia had a very strong benefit for going to nolynch, and Bookwyrm made it quite possible that lynch would still be achieved.
I haven't been able to immediately find who said it, in which context. Will be looking for this after posting this, since I've already spent quite too long on writing.
flubbucket: I'm the Innocent Child. I'm the Serial Killer.
*eyes you very hard*
*considers how much of a departure from the C9++ setup this would be*
Nah...
flubbucket: For the record, I'm not buying the lover thing one little bit.
Out of interest, if we're not lovers, do you honestly believe that I would've gone along with this? I think I was as universally townread as Vitek, trent and you, and think that if I was mafia, I could easily have coasted along to at least the final three.
Additionally, if you don't believe we're lovers, do you also not believe that we have day-chat? Even with Joe's absence, that's still something we should be able to prove somehow before EoD.
HypersomniacLive: mchack said he'd protect one of them on N3, so, assuming the claim's true, the faction NK had a 50% chance of failing.
mchack also realized (and stated publicly; interesting that you missed this) that they have a roleblocker, which should've been able to block him protecting us, meaning that mafia should've had a 100% chance of killing us both.
HypersomniacLive: I'll go out on a limb and say that gogtrial34987 will state this is the explanation of them being alive, regardless of if the claim's true or not.
Would I have stated this before you brought it up? Will I now? Who knows? (Well you do, apparently.)
I figure there's a couple of possible reasons for mafia to have decided to keep us alive last night. Not wanting to risk that remaining PR being another doctor? Both being town-read by both me and Joe, so figuring we'd give them two votes to help them mislynch all y'all? Pure WIFOM?
(And I have little doubt you can think of several more reasons that you'll question me about not mentioning yet.) *g*
At the beginning of this wall post, I stated that I wanted my four remaining suspects to have a chance to question us. What I noticed is that, in order, HSL wanted input on the setup, Bookwyrm asked us a single question, (HSL "Heh"ed me), Vitek extensively questioned things about us but never addressed us directly, trent completely failed to address us in any way and only talked to and about others, and HSL talked a little bit more about us. The trent thing pinged me hard, and reminded me of the way he initially reacted to scene's claim.