trentonlf: When I was doing my ISO of mchack I got a similar vibe to him from Day 1 and 2 that I got from him from last game, although today he has started to give me a different vibe but I can't shake the feeling I get when reading over the first two Days. [...]
I haven't yet gone over his game #54, but would reading him as Town Doctor shed a different light on those uneasy vibes you got from his D1 and D2?
trentonlf: [...] I'm unsure how to take his claim as well, although there's been no counter claim and I would think if there was another doctor still out there they would know if mchack was lying and say something, but there is no guarantee of another doctor. Are you talking bad dreams in game or in real life?
How exactly would another Doctor know if mchack's lying given the setup we're in?
trentonlf: [...] So if I try to ignore the joking Joe does not have much substance to his play other than his focus on Vitek. [...]
Not sure I follow on the substance in relation to his focus on Vitek. Could you elaborate?
gogtrial34987: [...] It's probably the ballsiest fameclaim of them all to make, given that scene chose the same one. [...]
I don't think I've come across a fameclaim before. Is it the sort that grants the claimer a spot high on the mafia fame board?
gogtrial34987: [...] Do you realize you made a mistake being so swift with your claim being all prepared already? [...]
When I first read your post #684, I wondered what the significance of how many minutes exactly it took him to post his claim. I see here that you considered it a too short time span. Putting aside that it wouldn't really take all that much time to type the content of his claim post, he's been sitting at L-2 for days now (minus a brief period where trentonlf had unvoted him to do a reread), i.e. it was quite likely he'd be put at L-1 at some point before deadline.
Do you think that only scum would prepare their claim in a situation like this? If so, why? And would you find it less/equally/more suspicious if it took him longer to claim post, and why?
gogtrial34987: 11 minutes since the first post, that the second (in which I voted you) merged with. So you need to compare the edit timestamp with the timestamp on your claim.
I still had a tab open showing this (attached) - this one shows 8 minutes. [...]
Between mchack's post #686 (where he comments on it), and your reply to him in this post a good chunk of time had passed (can't tell now how much exactly thanks to GOG's shitty timestamps system, but something between over 1hr and 2hrs). Are you saying that you had left that tab open for all that time, and took the screenshot when you replied to him?
gogtrial34987: I don't think the N2 failure can be through anything other than a roleblocker (modulo the promised twist).
[...]
What do you mean with the part in parenthesis in relation to the RB?
gogtrial34987: [...] Town has a very low probability for also having a roleblocker. [...]
Not sure I follow why the probability is very low. Because of the very small pool of numbers (96-100)?
gogtrial34987: [...] I like [...] his "let the day play out" D2 stance. [...]
Why do you like his stance? Because he was doing something with the time we had
before he was called out, or simply because he said it?
gogtrial34987: [...] mchack's votes on the other hand seem to be votes of opportunity.[...]
Could you elaborate on this?