mchack: This isn't encouraging. I respect that you were sick and didn't have the time and energy to do a re-read (I hate how much time these use up.)
but saying you'll re-read tomorrow and only then deciding on who you may be inclined to vote (after sufficient questioning, I'm sure) means we might be well into the last 24hours of the day when we get your first vote. On a vitek. I mean on a weekend. (With a vitek who tries out how many days he can go on mafia without voting once. (while being scum?)) [...]
Yeah well, I'm not going to apologise for not staying up all night to do a reread in case people decide to take the weekend off when the deadline, even if only a tentative one, was set a few days ago, and most seemed ok or not bothered by it.
Not sure I follow what exactly your interest in my vote specifically is; you think I'm mafia, so however I vote, you'll take it as a bad one. Since you think I'm mafia, shouldn't you be rallying people to vote me? There are at least two votes on your wagon that would easily jump on mine, and getting the other two should be doable as nobody has made a stance against voting me.
Or are you concerned I'll end up voting you? It goes without saying that I'll self-preserve on you, should it come down to that, but I won't vote you if I don't absolutely have to as I still don't scum-read you. Now, if you've upped your scum game by that much, I'll tip my hat to you post game.
mchack: [...] ok, I think crow is in order for me. [...]
Rest assured, there's more coming your way should I be Today's lynch.
mchack: [...] that's too wishy washy for my taste. What things had started surfacing, where we may have had more coming out of? You mean scum slipping up? sure could've happened or not. could happen today or not. Nothing yesterday had higher chances of scum slipping up than today, I think. [...]
No, I don't mean scum slipping up, certainly not in the way you seem to mean and look for it; another difference between you and me. I've said it before, the devil's in the details; wording, context, timing and tone are factors to evaluate motivation and mindset.
Take for example JoeSapphire. Another one's Bookwyrm627. I'd say ISO them to see all the things, some little, some subtle, but I'm not sure that'll bring anything, if for no other reason than it's a suggestion from someone you're scum-reading. More on these two later.
mchack: [...] How did scum regroup with more info on their hands? they already knew exactly the flip scene would bring. So in their regrouping they had exactly no new info. The only new info we all got at the same time with lifts flip and scum had no time to regroup about that. They got that info, exactly when we did. [...]
You know, I expected this question from you. From Bookwyrm627? No, he's too smart, and has demonstrated both that and thinking in ways and directions, not to mention his ability to plan and plot, that him needing an explanation just makes me go "No".
Flips is not the only kind of Information mafia gets. Mafia knows who isn't in their ranks, don't overlook/underestimate this. That alone gives them the advantage to evaluate the in-thread happenings in a conclusive manner, and strategise and plan accordingly. Town's trying to figure things out, and that requires more extensive discussion. When the Day's cut short, town's left with very little to possibly nothing to work with additionally to what they already had a Day before. Assume for a moment that the exchange between SirPrimalform and myself is v/v. Look at how that became quite the focus point, and the conclusions drawn from it, then tell me if it comes as a surprise we're both alive Today.
Yes, we get the flip, but that's often not particularly telling by itself when trying to connect the dots, and tell apart the town from those blending in well; dedoporno comes to mind.
Take for example Lifthrasil's flip (and try for a moment to let go of your fixation that I had figured out he was the Cop). Then go back and look what he left us in-thread, and who was voting him D1/D2, and see if you can, even remotely safely, draw any connections and conclusions. I'll go as far as saying that Lifthrasil flipping Cop was more of a bonus for the mafiosi; with a possible Godfather and investigation-immune SK in play, even he himself couldn't rely on his results, at least in early game, and scum would definitely take advantage of that, and rather easily shed doubt on his reads and cause a mis-lynch.
mchack: [...] what has your most favourite D1 bus been on gog, if I may ask?
(only if you remember, no need to go through old games, time is sparse enough as it is) [...]
I'd like to think that you're asking this to try and find a condemning connection between my answer and what I did and didn't do. In which case you're out of luck, nothing springs to mind. If, however, that's not what you're doing, then my reaction is:
*shakes head*
Seriously?
mchack: [...] But I still think it could've brought you to hammer, if you were truly on the fence about scene and a scum Joe wouldn't have wanted that reaction from a town HSL, now would he? hammering his buddy, who had almost made it. [...]
I'm pretty sure that I never led on that I'm fence sitting, quite the contrary, and you and SirPrimalform, have been arguing for two Days now, that the lack of fence sitting is a strong point contemning me as supplementscene's buddy. Now you're claiming that sum!JoeSapphire was the single one of all the people present at the time that saw town!HypersomniacLiveI fence sitting so wouldn't risk it, because otherwise your theory of supplemenscene, JoeSapphire and me being the mafia team doesn't hold.
You can't have it both ways - either the lack of me fence sitting was obvious, thus scum!JoeSapphire could pretty safely
challenge me to hammer, or I was fence sitting in which case you have to provide the related evidence to support that and your theory that it was a calculated, safe jab between scum-buddies.
mchack: [...] I have read your entire post in full and [...]
~ snip for economy ~ *sigh*
And missing the point, and the big picture, again, if you actually did read my post in full. This is the last time I'm going to try and explain it to you as plainly as I can, and I'll start with a couple of very basic Q&A:
1. Did D1 comprise solely of those 40 minutes of your timeline? Oh look, it doesn't.
2. Was supplementscene getting heat only during that time-frame? Oh look, he wasn't, in fact it was most of D1.
3. Were people against lynching him over the course of the Day, and up to the moment he claimed? Oh look, just about everyone was on board with his lynch; in fact, the only one openly against it was
you (see how easy it can be?).
4. Did I anywhere speak of a certain D1 Lynch
after he claimed? Oh look, I didn't, I actually went ahead with SirPrimalform's argument, and yours; it's right at the beginning of my reply to him in post #648. And if that didn't clue you in, I clearly spoke of him being the certain
D2 Lynch a bit further down.
5. Was anyone budging before dedoporno unvoted him? Oh look, no, in fact flubbucket put him at L-1, which was the triggering fact for supplementscene to do a full claim.
So, are my initial assumptions still wrong? Are they the ones you're sure you debunked?
The bigger picture isn't what you understood it to be, that's just an element of it. The bigger picture is that mafia have a certain win condition to fulfil, and play to that win condition; game doesn't start and end at D1. So, assuming that everything about my late D1 is as clear cut as you say, and I'm supplementscene's buddy, what is my long-term motivation and plan behind my D1 actions (with the outcome I described being a reasonably safe one), in regards to fulfilling my win condition? Why and how do those actions of mine advance my mafia win condition? Can you answer these questions?
If I were scum-reading you, I'd have to say that you're misrepresenting my argument, while dodging the key-question to the bigger picture because you don't actually have counterarguments, nor are able to answer my question without contradicting yourself.
On a side, but related, note - look who came to your aid, adding/emphasising on your good arguments against mine, and talking about a D1 wasted town lynch. As if town lynches are always, no exceptions ever, on scum. Or that a missed D1 lynch is always detrimental to town, even when hitting scum on the very next one. But surely Bookwyrm627 couldn't possibly know that. So mchack, make sure to give him a few more of your town points.