It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
gogtrial34987: I disagree quite a bit (we need to play to win the war, which we do by drawing connections for which every bit of input helps - lynching as swiftly as possible just allows us to win a single fight, but deprives us of information), but all the same I can't see this answer as AI.
avatar
mchack: hm. does really every bit help? How about distractions? How about whatsitcalled... filibustering ? Or muddying the waters? or all those expressions that suggest that it's possible to misdirect town by talking a lot. not all information is equally useful and I stand by my assertion that if we have found scum we should lynch it and not wait and see if he can't wriggle out again by talking us down.
I generally believe that these things work to scum's benefit for the short term, but give town an advantage in the long term; town winning will frequently depend on someone being able to take a step back, recognizing that something like that happened, and pointing it out for everyone to recognize.

Sure, if the day had gone on much longer, scum might have found a distraction with which to stage a scene wagon derail attempt. Such an attempt might even have succeeded. But there was more than enough smoke around scene that I have little doubt we would've lynched him eventually, seen his flip, and could then analyze such a derail attempt, for an easy second scum scalp.

avatar
mchack: Maybe it's just because you're so analytical and observant
I'm guessing that if I give you scumpoints for this, you're just going to follow HSL's playbook and claim your scum game is much more advanced than that, eh?
*gives you scumpoints anyway*

avatar
mchack: but my brain does lose older information if presented with a lot of new information after a while. I can see myself getting distracted by lot's and lot's of ongoing discussions.
This at the same time rings true, yet doesn't at all mesh with how I remember you from #52.

*ponders*
I find reading you troublesome, which is annoying, given your wagon status. I'd wager there's two, and quite possibly three town between flub, Bookwyrm and trent (scary thought: a bookwyrm-trent mafia team! Brrr; I'll now be worrying about that scenario for many hours...), and I see them all as extremely experienced. If this was the endgame, I'd probably vote for you just on that basis, as I've learned that my own reads suck. I have a little voice saying that I was right on scene, so I should totally go with my gut, but eh - hubris.

So let's see... where do we go from here. Hmm. Do you have thoughts on Ixam? And what would you say is your most important contribution to the game so far?

avatar
gogtrial34987: Do the both of you have any thoughts about the HSL vs SPF back and forth?
avatar
Vitek: That they seem to nitpick anything the other one says and I I mostly tend to filter their conversation out of my mind.
I looked at HSL posts and I agree with what people said that he is asking a lot of question but brings very little of his own and doesn't seem to draw conclusions so while he might seem pro-town it doesn't contain much of actual scum-hunting.
I have very little experience with HSL so it is bit hard for me to say if it differs from his town play but it gives me impression of scum play for sure.
I've observed HSL quite a lot since I first started playing. That still doesn't mean I'll read him correctly (as I reread a bit of #52 to get a better bearing on mchack, I also remembered that I bought HSL's scum game there until the very end), but his nitpicking at least is regular play. I have him as a slight scum lean due to that nitpicking feeling a bit ... restrained to me in this game compared to previous ones (though at the same time more vehement than I'm used to? (I hope that makes sense; he doesn't follow through as much as I'd expect, yet he stabs deeper or something...)). To be fair, I could plausibly feel that just because I haven't been on the receiving end so much, or maybe it's the feeling under the weather thing which he mentioned in one of the recent posts that I've only skimmed so far.

I do notice that you're not saying much about SPF in your answer. I know you gave him a bunch of town points in #557, but does his attitude toward HSL ring true to you?

avatar
Vitek: Our mod has the second most post of all people participating in this game.
Who has the most? (It's flub isn't it? I just know it's flub. No wonder he is lock town!)

avatar
mchack: Desperately looking for reasons to lynch scene right at the morning of D2 when noone else looked sideways at him yet and most people at the end of D1 said they tend to believe his claim? nope, that does not compute.
You were in a lot of games. Did you ever come across any game, were scum bussed a member on reasons not discussed before right out of the blue on a morning? And then got lynched for it next day? I don't think so either. It's just ludicrous.
I can very easily imagine that scum - being certain that the doctor claim wasn't true - would feel in their bones that scene was going down. Jumping on him right away in order to gain town credit would seem to be the best way for them to salvage something from it. And yes, smart scum would find some new reasons to make that bus believable.

avatar
HypersomniacLive: I had a rough dentist's appointment yesterday, which likely led me to lose the battle against the bug I had been fighting for the past week.
I hope you'll feel better soon, and that regardless of which team you're on, it won't affect your play and your enjoyment in the game too much!

avatar
flubbucket: Well at least you didn't change your avatar......or did you??
avatar
SirPrimalform: Nah, it's been Bernard Black the whole time.
Deja vu, but I have no idea what this is about. For someone who's absolutely not up to date with pop culture, could you please clarify if this is in any way relevant to the game?

avatar
HypersomniacLive: As for Ixamyakxim, he has even less posts than Dessimu had when he dropped off, which he spent mostly talking game setup and not answering questions before he jumped on the mchack wagon based on Vitek's analysis.
Is this bit about Ixam in response to anything in particular?
Do you see Ixam's behaviour as AI?

avatar
flubbucket: [...] The lion's share of it seems like town vs town. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Funny, I'm starting to consider the same. Partly because of things I've thought over while lying sick, and partly because his reaction to me calling him out seems more on the OMGUS side as time goes on, and he keeps falling over himself to prove he's doing some serious scum-hunting. Keeping it in mind for now.
Bleh. And here I was thinking I might actually get to scumread you! ('course, as you keep reminding everyone, your scum game is maybe really just that good?)

Oh, and there I'm all caught up again.

vote Ixam

Some - any! - contribution might get me to back off there, but for the moment I'd rather cut the dead wood now while we have some elbow room, rather than later.
Since there's been extremely little interest in his lack of play (can anyone explain why?), I don't expect that wagon to go anywhere. If it indeed doesn't, I should have a decent amount of time during the day tomorrow for rereading and evaluating if I'd prefer joining mchack or HSL's wagon. Not particularly opposed to either, but too tired right now to feel like I could make a good decision.
Joe, I wonder why you always attack me only after I mention you.

Other times you seem to mostly not pay attention to me and the moment I turn my eye toward you, you are here in full swing mafia-reading me and twisting my posts to fit your case, err, I mean "interpolating", as you call it, because it is always the most honest thing in mafia to "interpolate" instead of quote.

D1 you seemed to have little issue with me but as soon as I questioned your RVS vote on the biggest wagon I was suddenly bad for not voting and was giving you creeps. Now again, right after I mention you I get voted in your next post (your first vote since you revoted scene on my beckons btw, mr. "you-vote-too-little").

I wonder if there is some mafia term that would describe your behaviour.

avatar
JoeSapphire: 557 - vitek says supplementscene voting sirp makes sirp look good. I can see that. Also if vitek's scum this is probably accurate too. vitek going for town points by clearing a town? vitek also points out that supplementscene was wishy-washy in his reads of me, which I commented on a little at the time - It was weird, and it does look bad for me, but it was either down to scene's general contradictory manner, r else he was playing more cleverly than I give him credit for.
Heh.

avatar
JoeSapphire: 577 - vitek hasn't voted? Is that normal for vitek?
Do you know who called me out last game for not voting? Lift and flub, both mafia players.
Incidentally in recent days I was reading through G15 (your game btw.) where I said things like this (the part about me not voting the whole Day at all).
For someone who frequently recalls older games and recently even mentioned events from game 8 (that's from 2011) you seem to be suddenly quite forgetful.

avatar
JoeSapphire: 585 - hello pot :)
actually you're starting to sound more like your old self today.
I am not meh. At worst I am "whatever".

avatar
JoeSapphire: vote vitek
... negative ... I might change the vote to McHack if nobody else is interested in vitek, as their teaming is a possibilty.
Peculiar choice of the two.
And what does negative even mean?

avatar
JoeSapphire: I'm also happy to lynch trentonlf(didn't lynch d1)
What?
avatar
SirPrimalform: So not only did supplementscene not get modkilled, but he didn't get nightkilled?

Interesting.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Anyway, I see no way out of this situation other than to lynch scene (which I can't believe you didn't do yesterday considering his PM post).

vote supplementscene
avatar
SirPrimalform: Argh... supplementscene claims to be on his final warning, but I dunno. Quoting a huge chunk of text like that is instamodkill material to me, it's not like it was a single phrase or something that might be warning-worthy.
I've had this sequence from the start of D2 in my "to judge" notes for a while now, and I keep going back and forth over it, coming from the tack: Was this gauging the potential for scene's claim being believed?

Anyone have a clear opinion on it?
I'd specifically like to hear from Joe, from trent, and - because why not? - from Ixam.
avatar
gogtrial34987: I've had this sequence from the start of D2 in my "to judge" notes for a while now, and I keep going back and forth over it, coming from the tack: Was this gauging the potential for scene's claim being believed?

Anyone have a clear opinion on it?
I'd specifically like to hear from Joe, from trent, and - because why not? - from Ixam.
I am not sure I understand what you are wanting to know, could you please elaborate?
avatar
gogtrial34987: I've had this sequence from the start of D2 in my "to judge" notes for a while now, and I keep going back and forth over it, coming from the tack: Was this gauging the potential for scene's claim being believed?

Anyone have a clear opinion on it?
I'd specifically like to hear from Joe, from trent, and - because why not? - from Ixam.
Are you referring to the quotes of SirPrimalform that you listed and whether he was gauging scene's truthfulness in his claim or if he was doing something else? I saw it as SirPrimalform saying he thought scene should have immediately been mod killed for quoting his PM as it's listed in the OP as a no no, and later when scene posted that he was on his final warning it gave SirPrimalform pause as it was something that was possible but he still didn't believe scene was being truthful.

If that's not what you were wanting my opinion on please let me know exactly what you are wanting to know.
avatar
gogtrial34987: I'm guessing that if I give you scumpoints for this, you're just going to follow HSL's playbook and claim your scum game is much more advanced than that, eh?
*gives you scumpoints anyway*
What if he said his scum play is much less advanced than that?

avatar
gogtrial34987: I've observed HSL quite a lot since I first started playing. That still doesn't mean I'll read him correctly (as I reread a bit of #52 to get a better bearing on mchack, I also remembered that I bought HSL's scum game there until the very end), but his nitpicking at least is regular play. I have him as a slight scum lean due to that nitpicking feeling a bit ... restrained to me in this game compared to previous ones (though at the same time more vehement than I'm used to? (I hope that makes sense; he doesn't follow through as much as I'd expect, yet he stabs deeper or something...)). To be fair, I could plausibly feel that just because I haven't been on the receiving end so much, or maybe it's the feeling under the weather thing which he mentioned in one of the recent posts that I've only skimmed so far.

I do notice that you're not saying much about SPF in your answer. I know you gave him a bunch of town points in #557, but does his attitude toward HSL ring true to you?
Thanks. I am most interested if it is usual that there seem to be fairly little amount of conclusions drawn from those question as here it seems there is quite a lot of it but they are rarely followed by any action (not necessary vote but at least calling someone scummy).

Yeah, I don't think SPF is mafia. For his scene interactions and I couldn't say I saw anything scummy from him so far.
The argument between HSL and SPF seem too nitpicky from both side to me to really interest me but it doesn't make it necessarilly scummy. I know well enough how hung can SPF get when he thinks he found mafia as town so I can't tell it makes him scummy.

avatar
gogtrial34987: Who has the most? (It's flub isn't it? I just know it's flub. No wonder he is lock town!)
SirPrimalform. Might be surprising but last game he was 3rd or so as well, so not that strange I guess.
Or if I was to cheat and add Poppy's posts to my own, it would be me by far. ;-)
Vote Count

mchack - 3: Ixam, flubbucket, Bookwyrm
HypersomniacLive - 2: SPF, mchack
Vitek - 1: Joe
Ixam - 1: gogtrial

Not voting - 3: HSL, trent, Vitek

10 players. 6 to lynch
*sorry for the monster post. it organically grew and grew with each refresh after doing the re-read(s)*
*edit "before" post: ok this didn't go through (too big or format errors?) and I almost gave up on it then, because it's already so late, and I'm sure anymore it's that smart of a post anyway. But then I thought. Hey it might be crap but spend way more time, than I'm willing to admit for it (5 hours) and I don't want to scrap it and revise in the morning, because that's even more time spent. I wrote it so I post it. :P ... ok made a pause and shortened the quotes somewhat*
* ok third try. I'm really angry now. it has to be a tag somewhere but I can't find it. How many lines are possible? dangit, I'll just try the first part only. and go to bed.

avatar
mchack: [...] But yesterday? not so much. I really felt HSLs endless stream of questions in every direction and corner where there to distract from lynching scene. Finding something else, someone you could sort out first, because scene might self-resolve someday anyway.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: And that's the big difference between you and me.

You decided that those off supplementscene's D1 wagon were suspect, while those on it weren't until proven otherwise, and that based solely on his flip.
I've been meaning to get back to that now that we have more flips, so I just re-read the EoD1 again (more thorough this time than the first):

around 45 minutes left
#329 scene (scum) falseclaims (after HSL says in #326 @supplementscene, I see your light on. Silence's is definitely not the path that may get you to live.)
(At that time he is at L-1 with these votes: JoeSapphire, gogtrial, Lifthrasil, dedoporno, SirPrimalform, flubbucket)
#330 flub (town) asks about self protecting. [Likely does not see a pm copy there.]
#332 dedo (town) unvotes saying he's not ok with it though (suggesting pm copy)
#334 mchack (town :P) moves vote from lift to SPf trying to start an alternative wagon after seing the claim (never to be seen again that day, only coming back to it at nightfall to read what happened)
#335 bookwyrm (unknown) votes scene putting him at L-1 again, without saying why
#336 trent (unkown) doesn't know what dedo meant and asks him about it (obviously not seing a pm copy there)
#337 HSL (unknown) unvotes Joe and coaches flub to answer the question and asks dedo (who unvoted) "I assume you believe the claim. What's your second choice now?"
#338 dedo (town) says pretty much anyone (well SPf, Dessimu, Joe or wyrm) but not mchack (town) and lift (town)
25mins left
#340 dedo (town) worries why trent or HSL haven't seen what he saw (pm copy)
#341 flub (town) states it's been 20 mins since he asked scene (scum) if he could self protect
#342 HSL (unkown) says he thinks he sees the same as dedo but not saying what it is. Also that he'd vote the same people but not Joe (interestingly) + asks bookwyrm why he voted after the claim + asking scene a second time to answer flub
#344 trent (unknown) still doesn't get what dedo is suggesting
#345 scene (scum) says "That's the PM, it didn't specify" claiming a) pm copy as dedo suggested & b) it didn't include info about self-protect
#346 HSL (unknown) votes SPf and asks "who else?" obviously now convinced it was a pm copy
#347 scene (scum) tries to vote SPf forgetting to bold
#348 dedo (town) answers trent that he's worried about him not seeing what he sees
#349 wyrm (unknown) says he voted scene after claim because, a) could be fake b) could be pm copy c) should've known if he can self-protect [dangit, wyrm after re-reading this post, I'm really tempted to put you back into my town pile. It is such a strong strong hint. Putting your buddy to L-1 and giving those reasons? ballsy? or just town]
#350 vitek (unknown) decides not to lynch scene
#353 trent (unknown) answers dedo, he still doesn't know what dedo means. The formating is in the op. Seems to think fake claim.
10 mins left
#355 wyrm (unknown) makes his point again but now tends to believe pm copy (even saying it was probably by mistake) [because vitek and dedo? why did he leave out HSL in that list?] and so either lynch or modkill but still tells us that scene answered the question about self-protecting wrongly. [Still doesn't apreciate that the two are mutually exclusive: it can either be pm copy or fake but not both. - ah welcome back at my possibly scum list ;)]
#356 flub (town) drives the point to dedo that knowing whether one can selfprotect is basic knowledge.
#358 vitek (unknown) if only he claimed sooner, could be false claim but I don't know
#360 dedo (town) do you really think scene could come up with a false claim that is so near-perfect
#361 HSL (unknown) tells scene to bold his vote to count, asks vitek who he'd vote?
#362 vitek (unknown) doesn't think scene could falseclaim like that [heh. he proved you wrong now did he? Or did you know all along it was a falseclaim?]
#363 scene (scum) votes SPf now even in bold
5 mins bump
#367 vitek (unknown) no last second votes
#369 dedo (town) asks trent if he'll hammer
#370 trent (unknown) says he doesn't believe the claim but doesn't want to chance lynching the doctor
#371 HSL (unknown) asks vitek why he hasn't put up alternatives to scene earlier
#372 Joe (unknown) asks HSL to hammer after the deadline. thinks the claim looks wrong, but doesn't know
1 minute left
#374 Lift (Town) states how he intentionally leaves the vote on scene since it's either pm copy -> modkill or fake
#375 Vitek (unknown) takes the time to answer HSL and bookwyrm but does not vote scene or anyone
#376 HSL (unknown) takes time to answer Joe but does not vote
#377 Bookwyrm (unknown) drives the point one more time in re-iterating Lift: "Either he copied or he lied." [argh, it's the perfect condensation. town again]
#378 scene (scum) Any lynch of unconfirmed better than no lynch [thinks himself confirmed]
#379 D1 end

so of those _on_ scenes wagon I feel town points should be rewarded to (Lift and flub are a given) bookwyrm (yep, go ahead an shiv me, but you are town to me) and I guess Joe (was unsure about him before because he only joined post-claim discussion 1 min before deadline , but he did actually ask for a hammer (not what scum would do in my book) so, I guess town points are due)
but not for gogtrial nor SPf (because actually not there at EoD1 after claim - so we can't know if they'd have hopped off)

so of those _off_ scenes wagon I feel scum points should be rewarded to (dedo is given) HSL (very much so) and Vitek (less but aswell)
but not for trent (why? he doesn't feel scummy but rather honestly stumped at why dedo went off the wagon; and also there is likely 3 scum, so he'd be the one to many)

So who's missing in all this? dessimu/Ixam hmm... he might actually make a much better partner for HSL and scene than bookwyrm (or vitek? not sure about that)

-> ok hsl, thank you for making me go through all that again. My new favorite scum team is HSL + Ixam(or vitek) (+scene) (based on EoD1)

(this turned out longer than I planned but it made me suspect someone new so that's nice. off to do a re-read of Ixam ... ok back from the re-read :P yep nothing at all speaking against him being the third scum... oh right re-reads dessimu, there was that. But it's just a bit of distancing at the start of game without even having a vote cast ... oh right re-reads scene. ok well there was a vote cast but interestingly scene also cast a vote on vitek as alternative wagon to himself before his claim, so that truely makes me less inclined to think vitek is his buddy. (or should it be actually more? as a final distancing move by scene before going down D1? argh. )

ok, right now my scumpicks are ++HSL +Ixam or +Vitek but _not_ --flub, -bookwyrm, SPf, gogtrial, trent, Joe (well unsure about Joe to be honest, though for now, I townpile him)

avatar
HypersomniacLive: I didn't, and I still don't see it that way; being on the wagon had a lot more value for scum on D1, and if off the wagon, drawing as little attention as possible was key.
Getting his wagon to the station as quickly as possible on D2, doesn't tell us anything, as everybody and their cat would appear eager to lynch him, and by not wanting other interactions you're limiting yourself to whatever weight and value the D1 ones had without any additional information/context.

Just to be clear, you can scum-read me all you want, I'm just pointing out that choosing the path you did, you're being short-sighted. I'm with gogtrial34987 on this.
fair enough. Never said I'm good at mafia, but I do get frightened, that scum might slip away when we wait too long albeit being reasonably sure of having found scum. I've seen more No-lynch deadlines than last minute lynches in my mafia career if I remember correctly. Right now I'm thinking about that game where I was mason with zfr and we had you down as scum and only the hammer was missing and somehow it didn't go through, although we thought it did (non bolded? can't remember) and you actually were scum (although recruited) and I got shot at night and ... let's say it's been traumatic. I don't want to experience that again. ;)

If I'm that sure we found scum, I always hope we achieve lynch as fast as possible. By the way, I've been meaning to ask. What's it that you can't talk about now, that you could've yesterday? (aside from coaching scene and talking about cops with lift, of course ;P)
avatar
gogtrial34987: I generally believe that these things work to scum's benefit for the short term, but give town an advantage in the long term; town winning will frequently depend on someone being able to take a step back, recognizing that something like that happened, and pointing it out for everyone to recognize.

Sure, if the day had gone on much longer, scum might have found a distraction with which to stage a scene wagon derail attempt. Such an attempt might even have succeeded. But there was more than enough smoke around scene that I have little doubt we would've lynched him eventually, seen his flip, and could then analyze such a derail attempt, for an easy second scum scalp.
if that someone hasn't been nightkilled before being able to take that step back. Last game was a scum win, although it appeared obvious to me (dead scum), that we were going down. I think it was in no small amount due to scum!lift just talking and talking his way to the win, while always being one of the highest scumreads around. And noone taking that step back. (maybe that special someone that could've, got shot at night)

avatar
mchack: Maybe it's just because you're so analytical and observant
avatar
gogtrial34987: I'm guessing that if I give you scumpoints for this, you're just going to follow HSL's playbook and claim your scum game is much more advanced than that, eh?
*gives you scumpoints anyway*
That was simply a reference to the conversation you had with HSL. I try and make jokes when I can. Especially when they are true and you are analytical and observant.
I'll gladly take scumpoints from you for pointing it out, but it is obvious to anyone anyway. You appear to be even less scummy than flub and he is confirmed by the mod. That's no small feat. Have you even been scumread once this game? Guess that means you won't be with us very long (just remember what I said about people known to be able to take a step back :P), but credit were credit is due.

(My (scum)game is not at all advanced, btw so you won't ever hear me claiming anything like that)

avatar
gogtrial34987: I'd wager there's two, and quite possibly three town between flub, Bookwyrm and trent
I say it's three town in flub, bookwyrm and trent. (yes I know I made the second 180 on wyrm now, but I just don't have HSLs vivid imagination to think wyrm scum after re-reading the End of D1)

avatar
gogtrial34987: So let's see... where do we go from here. Hmm. Do you have thoughts on Ixam? And what would you say is your most important contribution to the game so far?
well, as a matter of fact (in this post up above) I do. Ixam might be scum. or not. that's it really. But I found it astonishing that you brought him up just when I was moving him into my scumlist (on my own, before reading your post)

My most important contribution was ... hey, that's a mean question, now I think I haven't really contributed anything ... but I did. I'm sure I did. There is Information in every Post you said. The more Posts the better for town you said. Here, I almost have 30 posts now. :P
avatar
Vitek: If you still desire it, you can call me Clive. I won't mind at all.
No way, you're more of a Chico.
LOL - friends don't let friends drunk post Mafia ;) Though I'm guilty of violating that rule right now. I actually kind of like this post. You get the slow obvious clap for saying you like Flub (heh) and PrimalForm and while I may argue with some of your other picks for Town / Scum your reasoning isn't awful. In fact, your "hit list" of possible mafia / town reads almost like something that I'd post if I were trying to suss out iterations of possible teams

avatar
mchack: ok, right now my scumpicks are ++HSL +Ixam or +Vitek but _not_ --flub, -bookwyrm, SPf, gogtrial, trent, Joe (well unsure about Joe to be honest, though for now, I townpile him)
I don't agree totally with the names on each side, but I get what you're trying to do (figure out a "team" of scum players, given what they might be trying to do with their votes and posts).

Like you I totally agree about Joe - I have an "unread" of him - not sure at all.

avatar
mchack: fair enough. Never said I'm good at mafia, but I do get frightened, that scum might slip away when we wait too long albeit being reasonably sure of having found scum
Don't get too frightened - if you're town vanilla it's your job to die and give others hints with your wagon. I'm going to keep my vote on you for now but I'll have this post and your thoughts in mind when (if) your flips comes and if I'm still around to vote.
avatar
Vitek: Pardon me if I am stepping too far here but I would dare to guess you don't share the opinion of HSL of it being TxT argument?
Correct!

avatar
gogtrial34987: Deja vu, but I have no idea what this is about. For someone who's absolutely not up to date with pop culture, could you please clarify if this is in any way relevant to the game?
My avatar is Bernard Black, main character of a nearly 20 year old sitcom (oh man, I'm old) called Black Books.

No, it's not relevant to the game, just indulging Flub. :P

avatar
gogtrial34987: I've had this sequence from the start of D2 in my "to judge" notes for a while now, and I keep going back and forth over it, coming from the tack: Was this gauging the potential for scene's claim being believed?
Absolutely not, I was suggesting that he should have been modkilled already if we were to believe him and thus he was 99% proven to be lying. I'm not sure how you managed to interpret it any other way really?

avatar
Vitek: I know well enough how hung can SPF get when he thinks he found mafia as town so I can't tell it makes him scummy.
I love you too Chico. ;D

avatar
Vitek: SirPrimalform. Might be surprising but last game he was 3rd or so as well, so not that strange I guess.
Not at all surprising, I'm super lazy and hate constructing large posts.
avatar
mchack: #372 Joe (unknown) asks HSL to hammer after the deadline. thinks the claim looks wrong, but doesn't know
1 minute left
... feel town points should be rewarded to ... Joe (was unsure about him before because he only joined post-claim discussion 1 min before deadline , but he did actually ask for a hammer (not what scum would do in my book) so, I guess town points are due) ...
TL;OS (=only skimmed)

I noticed the part in my quote and are you aware he asked him to hammer AFTER deadline? And then when deadline passed he asked him again to do it?
It was in reference to G53 where HSL only voted after deadline and we no-lynched D1 so I would say it wasn't actual request for hammer.
Instead it means only post he made during the hectic deadline was joke and otherwise haven't contributed even though it seems he was around.
avatar
mchack: #372 Joe (unknown) asks HSL to hammer after the deadline. thinks the claim looks wrong, but doesn't know
1 minute left
... feel town points should be rewarded to ... Joe (was unsure about him before because he only joined post-claim discussion 1 min before deadline , but he did actually ask for a hammer (not what scum would do in my book) so, I guess town points are due) ...
avatar
Vitek: TL;OS (=only skimmed)

I noticed the part in my quote and are you aware he asked him to hammer AFTER deadline? And then when deadline passed he asked him again to do it?
It was in reference to G53 where HSL only voted after deadline and we no-lynched D1 so I would say it wasn't actual request for hammer.
Instead it means only post he made during the hectic deadline was joke and otherwise haven't contributed even though it seems he was around.
yep, I was perfectly aware of that jab. HSL got a lot of flak for voting just after deadline in that game - and I found it incredibly funny from Joe to make that joke in such stressful a time but all in all NAI. (the joke that is)

I try and imagine JOE being scene's buddy having an RVS vote on scene already, re-voting scene before the claim just to make sure (the hokey-pokey thing) and then right at the end of day with everyone on edge try and push HSL to hammer by reminding him of what happened last time he waited just a bit too long (and in time so that HSL answers him before Dayend so there would have been time enough for HSL(or you) to hammer) but I'm not really seeing it.

Might be he's just that bus-happy, but I'm finding HSL being scum with scene just much more plausible than Joe when looking at all this.
If anything it would have to be HSL + Joe + scene as scum team. which might actually work. Joe knowing HSL won't hammer could do this easily and however scene resolves (believed or lynched, there would be a scum on each side surviving the aftermath. hmm. I kinda like this thought, but at the same time I find that scum probably won't be this well concerted on D1)
Swift catch up. I'll intend to do a regular detailed response later today, if on a thorough reread I find that I have things to question and/or respond to still.
I can't imagine Joe being scene's buddy either. Not so much for the EoD hammer call (though that strengthens it), as for the way he stayed on the wagon all the way to the end. It would've been trivial for him to state "my vote was RVS, and I'm not yet convinced enough about scene to stay on". Instead he did an 'explicit' (well, for Joe-standards) "I'm good where I am" post once scene's wagon took off. ('course, he could be SK-scum, but that still basically goes for everyone.)
I've had Lift and SPF as possible scum buddies bussing, but Lift got taken out of the running, and Vitek does make a compelling argument on SPF's townness. (@trent, @bookwyrm, @flub: do you find Vitek's argument to be solid as well?)

scene+Vitek+SPF? that would make sense perhaps with the early scene/Poppy interactions. (I imagine Vitek's scum game is near flawless?) Wouldn't expect the Vitek-SPF interactions from scum, but that might of course be why they'd play like that. Need to ponder this - it feels too shiny.

I find the scene+HSL+Joe concept intriguing as well. I think I recall both Joe pushing on HSL, as HSL pushing on Joe, but no real interactions. (Reread fodder.)

Are there roles / possible twists that would fit with Ixam just ignoring everything being asked of him? mchack and Joe have now put him in their "could lynch" category as well, but everyone else keeps ignoring him as much as he keeps ignoring all of us.

trent: yes, that's indeed what I was wanting. So you see SPF's reaction there as town?