Some things from the last ~24 hours of D1 that I didn't manage to comment on / reply to before - written before seeing the start of the day:
mchack: Sorry about that. I wasn't intending to misrepresent, I just seem to have faulty memory.
I'm not the first to point this out, but town++ (which was direly needed after the "lynch me third!" lamist argument)
Lifthrasil: To me, all of that looks either like bad play or like scummy play. I still read her as scummy and I'm still saying we should either lynch her slot (Vitek) or Scene. Since lynching one will possibly tell us something about the other and I see a good chance that these two are a team.
I know that the whole scene-Poppy team has come up several times before, but this is the time that triggered me to ask: Could you lay down the whole argument for them being a team? All I can really think of is the extremely early one-of-them-might-be-buddying/pocketing-the-other narrative (which I think I myself started?) And the way scene hopped on Poppy's wagon serves as a stronger counterpoint to that for me, as that really makes me think that if scene is scum, Poppy is not on the same team. (But you think that that was an attempt at distancing, correct?)
gogtrial34987: Do you think Dessimu will have
a deja vu feeling for your reads list as well?
JoeSapphire: I prefer lists that include everybody - it helps avoid creating DOLs
DOLs? (mafiascum doesn't list it)
supplementscene: I think there potentially could be 4 Scum players on my Wagon yourself included. If there is higher number of Scum they could take a high risk strategy and create wagons with their numbers.
For future reference: at this point your wagon had 4 votes: JoeSapphire, gogtrial, trentonlf, Lifthrasil.
...
I don't even know how to begin constructing a useful question about this.
How about, "You
did read the C9++ setup document, right? So how do you think the SK would be coordinating with the mafiosi for this high risk strategy?" no... it just... *shakes his head and walks away*
(Oh meh, Lift wrote a similar thing already; ah well. Urgh, and dedo too! And mchack... C'mon guys, I know I'm three days late, but I saw him first!) >:P
supplementscene: While you maybe Town, why keep asking the bandwagon man the same questions as if you expect some huge insight on 1 or 2 throwaway comments amongst the reems and reems of posting I've made???
Because you keep dodging and refraining from answering. And every time you do so, I grow more convinced that I'm on the right track. Which is rather helpful, as I tend to doubt myself a whole lot.
gogtrial34987: That's indeed always a very good angle for looking at things. If you look only at players "throwing heat" at the both of you, who all stands out for that to you? Any thrown heat in particular which strikes you as inconsistent?
supplementscene: I think there potentially could be 4 Scum players on my Wagon yourself included.
[...]
And that includes you ofcourse.
[...]
Joe voted me on the first page randomly
[...]
Trent's reasoning was way off
[...]
Are Trent and Lift Scummy voting
[...]
SPF also asked about my posting style
So, I ask you who/what stands out, and you end up naming everyone on your wagon, no one on Poppy/Vitek's wagon (which at this point was Dessimu, you and Bookwyrm) and SPF. That's... not exactly helpful.
*frowns* Why SPF?
(Or was he no longer part of your answer to my question, and just a segue to you voting Lift?)
supplementscene: At the moment I'm going with Lift, Decimu and one other as most likely Scum buddies if there in fact just 3 of you. But Decimu made a random comment and maybe there's 2 more on my wagon.
So between me, Joe and trent, which one of us stopped being potential scum at this point? And why?
And so Dessimu is on your most likely scum team, but wasn't worth mentioning in answer to my "throwing heat" question?
gogtrial34987: Because I look at the Poppy-Lift arguments, and I can't honestly call either side "scummy", but the argument as a whole just feels off, particularly when reflecting upon it from some distance - less so when rereading the individual posts - and not representative of a town versus town argument. Like, it lacks... momentum? Depth? There was lots of hot air and bullets flying, but it's all superficial? No, that's not correct. I can't put my finger on it, but I do feel that there's something off and rotten.
Does that make sense?
Vitek: No, I just don't think it should work this way and it certainly doesn't for me.
If I find something wrong in discussion, I try to find what is it and if it makes one of the sides scummy, which side it is and then lynch that side (or leave them if I find I found nothing wrong).
I'd
like to be able to
find whatever it is that makes the argument feel off; but I haven't succeeded. You think I should then abandon it; I think it's still better than nothing.
Vitek: To call the whole discussion superficial, lacking momentum and full of hot air but not to be sure who is scummy in it just isn't good basis for a lynch.
I think we generally don't have a good basis for lynching on D1. We have best efforts and lots of uncertainty, and maybe if we're very lucky a slip or a strong feeling. But lacking that, an argument like this where I don't know who is scum, but do feel to be off,
does make an acceptable D1 lynch basis for me.
For D2? Possibly not anymore; not by itself. But let's see how things will develop. (Particularly if my D1 strong feeling is still around!)
supplementscene: I'm writing this after replying to these individuals but Gogtrial seems to have re-read and reposted in this thread yet has completely ignored my reply to him where I suspected him of being scum. Why no analysis there Gogtrial???
Vitek: Hello, pot, how is it going?
*chuckles, then gives you a raised eyebrow for coming to my 'defense'*
trentonlf: I’m not following why? Because I voted supplementscene?
dedoporno: Because you are not seeing what I'm seeing and not going crazy about it.
For the record, so I don't assume anything, what were you seeing?
For reference, these were the initial (re)actions, in order, to scene's role reveal:
flub: question scene (vote remains on scene)
dedo: unvote scene
mchack: move vote from lift to SPF (in 1 post)
bookwyrm: move vote from Vitek to scene (in 1 post)
trent: question dedo (vote remains unassigned)
HSL: move vote from Joe to SPF (over several posts)
scene: move vote from Vitek to SPF
Vitek: comment (vote remains on HSL)
Joe: comment (vote remains on scene)
Lift: comment (vote remains on scene)
-- D1 end --
SPF: comment (vote remains on scene)
Not present: Dessimu (vote remains on Vitek), gogtrial (vote remains on scene)
ZFR: Ixamyakxim has replaced Dessimu. Welcome Ixamyakxim! What do you make of D1?
And as I've never played with you before, nor seen you play before that I recall: Can you tell us a bit about your mafia experience / play style / stuff like that?
After seeing the day start:
ZFR: I'll end it next Wednesday, say about the same time as this one. I'll give the exact time Wednesday morning.
If you need an extension, please let me know.
Any chance of making it 2 (or more) hours later? This time was, and is most likely going to be, impossible for me to be here for.
I guess first order of business is seeing who all dedo suspected / was a threat to. And let's see if we can get consensus on resolving scene. I'd like to hear from him about his night before I'll say anything about his claim.