I just ISO'd trentonlf in the Smurfia game, as I didn't remember all the details. My position on trentonlf's play is still the same it was back then. So, I disagree with you, his post #986 and later ones are nothing like his Smurfia game. He had conviction, and put up a hell of a fight before family matters got in the way in that game. Look at his post #1005, look at the lack of conviction, look at how many outs he's leaving himself there.

If you had (have?) the time, a comparison between trentonlf's current play-style and an ISO of him in game #46 would make clear what I mean immediately. At least I think so.


I don't think that Bookwyrm627 cutting the Day short was about shutting supplementscene up. I've been trying to figure out what that was about, so I've gone over D2 again, and had a thought, perhaps one a bit crazy.

Lifthrasil left his breadcrumb in post #496. Now, we all assumed that all who commented on it on D3 (Vitek, you, trentonlf) noticed it later on, either during the Night or after D3 start. But what if it isn't so?
Bookwyrm627 shows up on post #497 (impossible to say now how much later after post #496 that was). mchack, Lifthrasil, and you address him. Then comes trentonlf in post #504, who was quite a bit around up to that point, which is the only one he replies to (post #510) before hammering supplementscene (post #512).

I know from experience that scum often use some code to send specific messages in-thread (and we've done it with trentonlf), so what if trentonlf spotted that breadcrumb right away, and signalled Bookwyrm627 to end the Day, so they could proceed with killing Lifthrasil, and see if he was the Cop?
I know, nothing solid to make it anything more than speculation, but it's not unthinkable, considering that finding and getting rid of the Cop and Doctor a.s.a.p., should the roles be in the setup, is a priority for scum. That might also explain Bookwyrm627's interest in my comment about things having started to surface, i.e. perhaps an attempt to trap me into a comment about the Cop he could use against me later (just like he did by misrepresenting a different post of mine).



That's not how I remember you from the couple of games we've played in the past, nor how I saw you play in game #54.


Come on, you know damn well what I meant; you're better than this.


[emphasis added]

Again with this sort of arguments. Yes, his lynch turned out a mistake, but you were the only one putting stock on that single thing. And since No Lynch frightens you so much, perhaps you should be more proactive?


Yeah, I see it.

*waits to see how long it'll take Bookwyrm627 to push for my lynch again*


I made a very specific comment about Bookwyrm627's D3 scum-pair and you. I expected some reaction from you, considering that you've been weighing such things quite a bit. And here you are with the above being your only comment.


The issue isn't that you're working through the PoE, it's that you try to make scum-pair connections on poor reasons; the sort of reasons that can easily apply to connecting you to others from the PoE.


That was not the point.


I only questioned the second one, and for that one I apologise, I don't know how I missed that, especially since it's right above flubbucket's post that stuck with me.


*sigh*

You just don't get how I operate.


This reads like a very big misrepresentation. Could you point to all the wagons I allegedly supported when they started to gain traction?

At least we agree on one thing, that Bookwyrm627 was prepping mchack to be the D3 lynch since D2.


I'm going to put trentonlf at L-1. Should he want/have anything to say, he's got ample time to do so before others make an appearance again (it's early evening in his timezone, and I see his light going on and off as I'm typing this post).

Should my wagon gain more traction while I'm asleep, I'd appreciate it if you didn't lynch me before I get a chance to check in again.


Vote trentonlf