Call me thick headed, blame the lack of sleep, or say what you want, but let me quote you

Doesn't post 222 clash with post 232?

How you managed to miss the theory that dedo may be scum and just latching onto someone who looks scucmmy (trent) is beyond me.

Oh, totally agreed. We could be picking it up, but do we want to? It's first day, we got almost nothing to go off and you want us to see some ambiguous point that maybe makes 0 sense to me even if I see it. So why don't you just do the pleasantries and explain? I see your vote pretty much as baseless as TB's. The point that we all may think in the same parameters is purely ridiculous!

For the part I'm thinking of - yes, it should be the exact same knowledge.

Giving it straight away pretty much defeats the purpose. You are totally right on not having much to latch on. That's why I'm trying to make the best of what I have.

The cow can be milked some more. We will get there at some point, though.

So half truths, evasions and deflection as well. And if mean that the knowledge is contained in the thread, then the same knowledge would also be available to non-townies as well, even though you dismiss that in post 222 once more, since you use the conditional Now even more curious about what you mean.

This makes me sound like a puppy. Which is fair, I suppose, because I've felt kind of like one in this game on occasion.

------------

Flippant remark: My PM does, meatbag. (Yes, I know I'm the only player that gets to see it)

------------

Serious business:
You bold the "surely", ignore the "almost" right next to it, and postulate a power that enables viewing alignment because "there is no sure about it" otherwise.

Dedo says that my play looks scummy on the surface, but not if you look deeper. You've managed to misintrepret his post again. Several other players have stated they see a similar pattern to me (which might get me NK'd, but I digress).

You've (from my view) blatantly misinterpreted my posts on two separate occasions and totally ignored my explanations.

4 instances of misinterpretation so close together doesn't seem like coincidence to me.

------------------

I did not say that lurking meant scum. I said that, and I quote, "Lacking any other leads, selecting a lurker to vote for would be decent play." I've read, multiple times, that lurking can and is used by scum to avoid making slips: conversation and explanations help town. Did you miss where Krypsyn got some suspicion for not communicating reasons? Read what I say, not just what you want to think I said.

------------------

My bad. I'd already put together 5 theories to pick from after saying that I don't know why Dedo is so convinced. Next time I'll try to figure out your next guess and add that too. Then figure out the theory you'd propose after that, and add that to the list. Repeat ad nauseam, until I've got a wall of text even more massive than those I've already been outputting. It couldn't be that I just stopped trying to come up with even more possibilities for something I didn't know.

I am just going to say this straight up, if all this talk of "you would know if you were town" is based on something in our PM's then this game already sucks. I am town and I have no idea if my PM is the same as any other townie and I don't want to know. This game is supposed to be about determining who is lying and lynch them base on their in game actions, not a PM the mod sends.

If this is the case of it being based off of PM's then please lynch me as I don't want to play that game.

Dont be sad - its what people are talking about that gives the clue. The PM the mod sends out is a little helper, is all - we extrapolate and make assumptions, but nothing is clear cut. By making assumptions and putting pressure on people, we can gauge heir reactions and act accordingly. Its not ever just a PM compare exercise. Who's to say each PM is not unique to each player.

Me and rwarehall *think* we know what dedo is on about - and it cant be revealed, as it will instantly become unusable. Thats if its what I think it is. I could be completely wrong of course!

Thats the beauty of the game - no info, we have to glean it where we can.

I got this quote from your post #220: "To sit on it without revealing is scummy play of the highest order."

Ahh, so this is what you were talking about? No, this isn't my reason for voting for dedoporno; my reason is somewhat different (though complementary).

Hmm... I am not sure about this.

However, as far as Bookwyrm627 is concerned, I have him neutral to town by his actions/rhetoric alone.

the big difference is you picked up on a scutmtell, ive picked up on a town tell - one is good to reveal, one isn't. you must see that, im surprised you even question it.

Thank you, my thoughts exactly. The vote on trent may or may not be accurate. We are yet to see about that. The more important thing is that some external data accumulated in the process that will help us in the long (not even that long) run.

And yes, I'm pretty sure we speak in the same language.

Agreed.

I couldn't have said it any better.

Agree wholeheartedly

To be clear, I, presumably we, believe this town tell to only be recognizable by town. As such, by taking more time and allowing other town to acknowledge recognition, we gain confirmed town. Once revealed, anyone, even scum, can claim "Oh I saw that". So once revealed, the additional benefit ends. Is that too hard to understand?