MovieBob is the Super Mario Bros 3-worshipping giga-incel who deludes himself into thinking that his unreasonable bigotry against Trump and fallowers thereof makes him not the Nazi, despite constantly tweeting Nazi rhetoric except with right-wingers in place of Jews. Before all this self-destruction, he reviewed movies on The Escapist. Edit: And has been fired from them twice.

Jim Sterling had an gaming-themed opinion show also previously on the Escapist; his self-destruction amounts to lingering on a few subjects with inconsistent reliability. One week, he's decrying the extremely sub-optimal working conditions for game developers; but he'll just as often whine about difficulty levels in a way that correctly states choice is ideal and falsely suggests it's a package deal with disability accommodation. Jim also claims in his podcast about game-based movies that Angry Birds is bad because pigs represent illegal immigrants and the birds are MAGA; obviously, the pigs are imperialists, birds are indigenous, he and I can agree the movie sucks, and Jim is a half-wit.

You are aware that your post just broke the forum rules?

Yup!

"Game was sadly unplayable on my lower end [specifics here] even though it seems to meet the requirements."

Is a valid thing for potential buyers.

HOW its worded, well...
Or if they have time while they tape together the chatbot.

Well said

Me? I think almost the same: a review(game/etc) should focus mainly on the product's qualities/flaws/etc.....with maybe a tiny bit of talk(if needed) about the devs/pub/etc and their high/low points

Oh to be fair, I'm not an exhaustive reader of Ts & Cs - if the reviews are on GOG's own site they can set whatever rules and boundaries they want for them and delete any that overstep that, I guess

Not super cool of them though and always a reminder that it's important to use a variety of sources for your purchasing decisions and not just base them on what it says on the site that wants your money, even the user generated content on there

I assume most of these deleted reviews were about the fact that GOG never received the uncensored version? If that'S the fact they definitely had no right to delete those since it is a very important information as well amnd it helps the custo,mer making an informed purchase decision which is what a review should do.

I saw a crass and terse review of a game that was actually helpful to me. It's since been deleted.

As far as reviews go, one has to sift out the "wheat" from the "chaff." Sometimes the reviews here on a particular program are rather "thin soup." Ste*m, despite its (many)other flaws, does often have quite a number of comprehensive reviews, which can be quite useful in making a purchase decision, on GOG, natch!((;--))

WOW! GOG deleted ALL those reviews because they criticize games. What an outrage!!!