Wirvington: I never meant to imply people were scabs, rather, than such change could potentially make for an interesting choice. Also, I was just sharing my thoughts on the matter openly so they could serve as food for thought (for myself included), and not demanding for such idea to be implemented rather than being debated upon.
Catventurer: I really do think that you need to reread what you said in your prior post because it does read as if you think that the guy who requests something on the first of each month without fail wants the game more while those of us who don't request anything right away are being opportunistic. I'll quote you below:
Wirvington said in Post #803, "The way I see it, such change could entail that people would think twice before asking for a regular game (especially at the end of the month) which they might not necessarily enjoy as much as others would Because games are not added only on the first of the month at the same time every month, nobody can come online at the same time on the first of the month to grab something immediately and feel confident that a game they might want more isn't going to be added later in the month.
If someone claims something on the first for the sheer sake of getting something, it's entirely on them if a game that is actually on their wishlist is part of the giveaway where they can't request it. They're still out, and the person who gets it isn't any less worthy or deserving because they didn't ask for anything right away. I'd hope that missing out on being able to ask for something even one time would be enough of a self-correcting deterrent that it would cause anyone who requests immediately for the same of getting something would put more thought into what they ask for in the future.
This is why I think the current system isn't broken and doesn't need to be fixed.
No, I don't think Wirvington needs to reread what he said. The one adding negative connotations as —opportunistic scab that ran off with something that they didn't deserve, disadvantage, being abused, fix what is not actually broken— is only you.
Also, your use of the —first come first served— and honor systems as part of your argument are out of place.
Said that, IMO the reread would be more beneficial to you and I will borrow your highly dismissive and self-centered phrase "everyone (except me)" may agree with you.
In case you need the post numbers to reread, just let me know.