To be clear mrkgnao, Im not looking to disprove your point
Im just pointing one of the multiple subjectively CoC enforcement
this forum has

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/paladin181s_humble_choice_giveaway_for_20212022/post1

DEPENDING on who is the host
AND its positive influences/connections with the moderators in turn,
the non-GOG GA may silently pass without frictions
Otherwise, lets say I organize it:
Deletion & imminent ban would be my prediction

Come on, you brought the topic on another thread & here my straight opinion:
Not all the customers are treated/attended exactly the same way
Why? Simple & without wearing paranoid tinfoil hats:
This is an incompetent amateur e-store. Tell me it is not :)

Thats how some say the service is incredible
while others diametrically the opposite
Quality shines by its total absence on this e-store

https://i.imgur.com/DTZSZPc.gif

As Braggadar said, if you're up for running it, you might as well give it a try.

I worked on the Steam GA last summer on finkleroy's Discord channel. At first we had 2 people running it, one for the old keys, and me for the new ones (over 1000 keys). After the first month, I had to have 2 more people helping me (don't know if they wish to remain anonymous) to get it over with, and in the last month, we added another one. We also had to come up with a system that would be fair for everyone (timezones, keys dispensed). And we were juggling a lot of lists, which we had to optimize to get things done more efficiently.

The person responsible for the old keys also had to have 2+ people helping out. Don't know the details on that side.

It's a lot of work. And I personally wasn't getting anything from the list, so, it was just a favor helping finkleroy out. So, if you wanna do it, just know that it will take up a lot of your time.

Not really a big deal, but how about 6 annually? I think 4's a bit too low.

Not a fan of the new rule to be honest.

There's room to move the number around. Nothing is set in stone yet. I picked 4 because I looked at my own history asking for games from the CG and saw I never went over 3 per year. So I thought 4 seemed fair but by all means I'm open to hearing what others think is a fair number or if annual limits are off the table entirely.

This doesn't seem like a good solution to me.

I support your idea, Benkii. I believe the implementation of this new rule will not only make users think twice before asking for a game but also will increase the chances of more people getting a giveaway. If you were to ask me, I'd say an annual 3 game limit would be even more adequate due to the fact that GOG's community and TCG thread's participants are literally planetary. The more different people are able to get a gift the better. At the end of the day, it's not about how many games one wins as it is about having fun playing something one really enjoys.

Sounds good to me. I was never a fan of "starred games" idea in the first place, and then even less when I found your choices for this category rather questionable, so I'm glad it's going away.

4 free games a year, on the other hand, is still plenty if those are titles you really care for. 6 realistically won't change anything because there's 6 or less months a year when there are many games offered to begin with, so this limit would be mostly theoretical because you'd be hard pressed to ever reach it.

Any specific reason why you are cancelling the starred category? I don't see it clashing with the new four-a-year rule (which I have no problem with).

Clarification question: Will it be four games in a calendar year, or four games in a twelve-month sliding window?

I have no problem with it.

Sounds good but I guess daggered (or games from GOG giveways for that matter) should not count to the actual limit, there's too many keys going to waste otherwise.

I think this is a good idea. 4 per year seems a good balance as that way more people will be in with a chance to get a game.

I strongly dislike this proposed rule. Yearly limits are intended to deter excessive requesters, but I do not think we currently have that problem - rather, currently we simply do not have many donations.

I would be mostly ok with having a 4-game annual limit of "starred games" since those have currently been few, but a 4-game limit across all games seems quite limiting.

In recent months I have missed out on some game offerings that have been available because others asked for them first; if I additionally had to judge an uncertainty of what may be available in the future, it becomes really difficult to judge what to ask for and when to wait.

I certainly agree people should only request games they really want, but even among those there may reasonably be different preferences.