I totally agree with this, and sometimes I feel that we forget this

Apologies for some of my words earlier, I just looked at the pics in post 1015. While I still disagree with people skimming people's posts from months back in such a manner to determine eligibility for giveaways, I can see why op banned them. That aside, I will still continue my own giveaway to allow some a second chance and spread more games when able.

Wholly agree 100% especially to the last bit. Not everyone is a saint though, and almost everyone harbors or says something that is being dark to some degree. So should every person be exempt from giveaways because they said something a month ago elsewhere online? Regardless it is up to a giveaway's op to determine rules, I was mainly (despite my getting overly and needlessly emotional earlier) trying to provide an alternative where some of those exempt from this giveaway can perhaps get a game now and again. Apologies to anyone if I cause any upset, cheers.

I missed the excitement of the followup, how unfortunate. A blue has made the position clear so I'll refrain from commenting any further, and just leave it at that - to second the remarks stated in post #1035. If you would like a civil conversation elsewhere, my door is always open to you ( (ø,ø) or anyone ).

As for Se7en_Bullets... his eligibility was doomed to be revoked. His position is no longer tenable. I attempted (perhaps in poor taste) to grant him a shot at redemption, and he blew it. I told you not to, silly boy.

Thanks. The word suave is in (at least) the romance languages with varying connotations (French, Spanish, Italian, and naturally Portuguese) and wormed its way into English too. It seems to have helped out in that regard from time to time.

Jed made it clear enough in post #1033. To maintain relevancy and civility, as per the code of conduct, or be penalised and take your business elsewhere. If I don't like the moderation of the forum, I can say my no-no words elsewhere :P.
If the decision has been made that echos the sentiments found at the end of post #1001 ("Therefore, misconduct on any other forum should be considered as violation of giveaway rules.") then so be it. It's not my giveaway to demand otherwise. I already voiced the potential concerns regarding that approach.

You're welcome. For a reason unknown to me that film has a permanent residence in my brain...

Maybe too many everlasting gobstoppers? Anyways, gonna leave it there lest the sound of scooters return our way ;)

I have only had one, and one is enough for anybody.

But giveaways are 'the more the merrier', so good thing we have more now eh? Good luck and continued growth and prosperity to all giveaways, and future enjoyment of all giftees!