It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Yes @scene @pooka 3f+1h is the intended setup bid misspoken earlier.

I see a start date hopefully before the end of month, maybe early next week.

Query @everyone should buying be possible by secret value or should it be open ONLY?
I've played both ways; iirc, open-only benefits L, secret ballot benefits F. I'm open for suggestion
avatar
supplementscene: Ping
avatar
PookaMustard: Ping
avatar
Cadaver747: Ping
avatar
joppo: Zeo!! I miss him. Good to know he's alright and still in contact.
Ping; also yes!
avatar
ettac orrazib si eman ym: Honorary ping
avatar
maxleod: ping
avatar
GamezRanker: Ping
avatar
ZFR: Ping
avatar
Lifthrasil: Ping
Post edited January 23, 2022 by Microfish_1
@Dedoporno ... Ping!

Everyone will need to make sure they can chat with me or vice versa (a previous conversation with yours truly counts?) Just so that I can dm you your choices when you are pres or chancellor.
Post edited January 23, 2022 by Microfish_1
avatar
Microfish_1: Query @everyone should buying be possible by secret value or should it be open ONLY?
I have no idea what this means, but by the looks of it the law of excluded middle seems applicable.

Therefore: yes.
avatar
Microfish_1: Query @everyone should buying be possible by secret value or should it be open ONLY?
avatar
ZFR: I have no idea what this means, but by the looks of it the law of excluded middle seems applicable.

Therefore: yes.
As in when a government is outlawed, should everyone be able to vote by pm/DM AND refuse to say how they voted? In this case the public would know the final vote count but not how certain people voted if they opt to not say. In this scenario, people could lie about how they voted, similar to how the pres can lie about the cards s/he received

Or, must everyone vote publicly only (in the thread and NOT by pm)
Post edited January 23, 2022 by Microfish_1
Vote sexretly by PM. Reveal votes who voted what afterwards.
low rated
avatar
ZFR: ....and instead of the terrible story and dialogues.....
*GR looks with daggery eyes at ZFR*
Terrible story and dialog? o.0 ;)

=-=-=-=

avatar
Lifthrasil: Exactly. In the same way that rafting is similar to playing a violin.
Hmm, now I wonder if Holmes would've been into rafting.

=-=-=-=

avatar
Microfish_1: Do you want to join? If so I'll add you to the list and let the PuzzleMaster know so he can finish up the flavor!
Zeo is your writer? Niiiiiiiice

Also, got yer ping......besides some IRL which hopefully shouldn't take up too much of my time, I am all ready to play when the time comes :)

=-=-=-=

avatar
Vitek: I am not sure whether I am interested in something new or not interested because I would have to learn rules.
It's pretty easy.....so easy that despite my blundering and "popping champagne early" in my one and only game(game 3), I still helped my team to a win.

=-=-=-=

avatar
Cadaver747: There are rules? No fun in that.
We could always try a no rules game sometime.
Rule 1: There are no rules. ;D
Post edited January 23, 2022 by GamezRanker
avatar
ZFR: I have no idea what this means, but by the looks of it the law of excluded middle seems applicable.

Therefore: yes.
avatar
Microfish_1: As in when a government is outlawed, should everyone be able to vote by pm/DM AND refuse to say how they voted? In this case the public would know the final vote count but not how certain people voted if they opt to not say. In this scenario, people could lie about how they voted, similar to how the pres can lie about the cards s/he received

Or, must everyone vote publicly only (in the thread and NOT by pm)
Knowing how people voted after the fact is a strong element of solving the game. So yes I'd have public announcement of individuals votes rather than a secret ballot.
Yes, votes have to be public after the vote. Keeping them hidden screws the game balance.
Thanks. Public voting after the fact, but what about during the vote; eg should Player 9 be able to say

Oh, Payers 1, 2, 3, & 4 voted Yea, while 5, 6, 7, & 8 voted Nay, I'm the tie-breaker but because Player 3 voted Yea, I'll vote Nay?
avatar
supplementscene:
avatar
Lifthrasil:
avatar
GamezRanker: Zeo is your writer? Niiiiiiiice

Also, got yer ping......besides some IRL which hopefully shouldn't take up too much of my time, I am all ready to play when the time comes :)
Yes, he agreed to come out of his retirement from this forum to flavor this game! :D

Yay!
Post edited January 24, 2022 by Microfish_1
If everyone plays nicely, maybe this time I'll tell you what the legend of the cows is.
low rated
avatar
Microfish_1: Yes, he agreed to come out of his retirement from this forum to flavor this game! :D

Yay!
Yay! Now make sure to provide him with plenty of tapioca pudding and whatever else older gentleman like, so we can get plenty of nice flavorz from him, k? :)


=-=-=-=-=

avatar
zeogold: If everyone plays nicely, maybe this time I'll tell you what the legend of the cows is.
Which cows? If it's the ones Doja Cat talks about, I already know that one.
Post edited January 24, 2022 by GamezRanker
avatar
Microfish_1: @Dedoporno ... Ping!
Pong.
avatar
Microfish_1: As in when a government is outlawed, should everyone be able to vote by pm/DM AND refuse to say how they voted? In this case the public would know the final vote count but not how certain people voted if they opt to not say. In this scenario, people could lie about how they voted, similar to how the pres can lie about the cards s/he received

Or, must everyone vote publicly only (in the thread and NOT by pm)
You said you played both ways, right? What are your feelings about it? Which way was more balanced? To be honest, as big a board game geek I am, I have only played SH once in here and that was that.
avatar
joppo: Zeo!! I miss him. Good to know he's alright and still in contact.
avatar
Microfish_1: Ping; also yes!
4 packets sent, 4 received, 0% loss. Delay in target getting to their computer = 24:00:00

avatar
Microfish_1: I see a start date hopefully before the end of month, maybe early next week.

Query @everyone should buying be possible by secret value or should it be open ONLY?
I've played both ways; iirc, open-only benefits L, secret ballot benefits F. I'm open for suggestion
I agree with Lift, ZFR and Scene. If we don't see how people vote it will be pretty hard to catch fascists in a lie. The game loses a lot of its social deduction aspect.
Votes made public with the election result is the way to go.
Post edited January 24, 2022 by joppo
avatar
Microfish_1: Also, got yer ping......
Pong