TARFU: What if the "liars and trolls" are Russian, as in this article? Are they also anti-putin?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html a) The series of articles on "Troll factory" was part of discrimination campaign that rolled out at Ukraine events. The "suddenly" factor is huge indicator about absence of its neutrality and validity (Saddam also had "suddenly" used the C weapons, exactly before war; Kadaffi & Assad also were "suddenly" evil and so on).
b) US government
have likewise issued publically available applications to own equivalent "troll army", which were available to download from official US websites. In 2011, I was able to actually read the official application forms for "spreading democracy and supporting homeland" - no idea if they are available now.
On behalf of this, please answer a rhetorical question wither the US govt "media" agents (trolls) are anti-obama?
On the table which I posted earlier, the russian "troll army" - in case its not be product of yellow liber
ast fake factory (alternative press) fun-fiction (see modern Ukraine press for a bold example), the troll army would belong to (D) "puppet".
Personally, I believe this russian "troll army" is a huge fake. Its utterly unprofessional and leaking for any secret operation - and such leakage cost would be very reputation damaging, especially in the background of political conflicts at precisely the time point.
I would start such a thing like USA does - on some closed down location, to begin with. I hope logic is your friend.
TARFU: Also, when Putin has radioactive poison put into your tea to kill you off (Alexander Litvinenko), what group do you need to belong to?
Please don't edit posts once I responded, because this is a very low conversation method.
Also, I am neither Alexander Litvinenko, nor I consider people like him to be any good.
Litvinenko was USSR run-over ex-KGB/FSB agent, who was very similar to Snowden, but differed in several aspects. From what I was able to collect the days he was liquidated:
1) He wanted to sell information to the highest bidder - to representatives of the highest power group cycles.
2) The information was not to be given out to generic public, as such he was a running over agent and
not whistleblower.
3) Information was highly political and probably discrimiinating against individual persons.
I want to remind you, that in current USA someone like Litvinentko wouldve been poisoned, then shot, then poisoned again and jailed for 1400 years - with controlled media immediately calling him canibal, pedophile, bank robber, weapon and drug dealer - all at once. With Guantanamo, stone-age information extraction methods are likewise not a problem.
I am not a big fan of current USA, but indeed there are countries much worse.
Current Russia is not on this list, but probably also not on the "better" list. Russia is under constant massive informational attack since Putin came to power and reversed exteranally-issued decomposition into country development.
If I were within circles of the foreign power clan, I would do exactly this against Russia, because its independent development would be not in my interest. Thats reality, unfortunately.