You mean point and click adventure or some other sub-genre? These sub-genres are confusing. Whenever, I think of adventure, I think vast horizons, valleys, cities and walkability so wrong or right, I tend to think of adventure consciously or subconsciously as open-world but I know games like Tomb Raider and Indiana Jones are also considered by many of its audiences to be adventure games.

Not everyone's eyes are the same. I mean it in the most literally biological way. People are different. Some are able to see things that others can not. Some are able to hear higher or lower frequencies than most. It's good that your eyes are incapable of picking up this distinction, but many people have different genes. They aren't just being dramatic, they actually see a very bothersome flickering that not only distracts them from the game, but gives them very tangible headaches.

Are you, by any chance, in your teens or lower tweens? Because way back when, young man, "adventure game" meant exactly one thing and no one went poopy over framerates! *shakes walking cane*


Aren't you confusing framerate and refresh rate here?

No, my good sir. Do you mean to offend? I am asking a legitimate question. I'm pretty sure the definition of what an adventure game was, was changed back in the 90s or even earlier but Today, it is rather subjective what an adventure game is. I see you are of the opinion that many games or even more are mislabeled as adventure games and that's why I asked you what you meant by adventure games.

The monitor's refresh rate is something else entirely.

Let's say the monitor redraws the picture at 144Hz, so 144 times per second. If the game is able to keep up, everything is great. If the game, however, draws the picture 30 times per second, so far as your eyes are concerned you are still seeing that choppiness, which your brain then interprets as flickering. It cannot see 144Hz, so for the purpose of this test it's non-existent, but it can very well see the delay between he frames of a 30Hz animation. The result then is the same as having the monitor redraw at 30Hz. That being flickering and a headache.

You don't but maybe other players care about it. Why does it hurt you?

we need an idiot police on the forum

Anyone else remember playing games that didn't even hit that?

Word. I'm on Steam all the time and the "omfg I dropped below 60 for a second" crowd is completely cancerous. First they only focused on the framerate and now it's "if I can't max literally everything on my mid-tier hardware from years ago.... OMFG THEY SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED ON PC SADGSGAFDGFDSHSH." Followed by cries of "UNOPTIMIZEDDDDDDDDDDD."

Most obnoxious shit ever.

Wow this went from no replies to quite the response. I posted this because the GOG continuity is unpredictable and I'm not always sure if something will work first. Basically this would just be a list of games locked at 30fps. If it doesn't matter then you could ignore it, but it doesn't have to be exsactly like the FPS police just something like it.

If your looking at Steam, just about everything is mislabeled.

The adventure game genre was never changed, but imo due to a decline in popularity, and the rise of action-adventure. Plus rampant mislabeling the younger audience, and console gamers, never really saw/played a real adventure game. Thus creating a confused mass of uninformed gamers.

Example: Ask a 20ish year old gamer what genre Tomb Raider is, they'll say adventure.

I asked a guy at work why he liked gaming on a console, he said "because I like using a controller"
He had no clue that you can use any number of controllers on a pc.

This is the same kind of thing. And it doesn't really matter how many times they say adventure games are dead, they'll always have somebody, somewhere creating a real adventure game.

This wiki does a pretty good job describing the genre.
[url=]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventure_game[/url]


PS
I guess the show I was watching was too boring to keep my interest, so... yeah, umm.. hope this helps?

Hmmm I remember nearly 20 years ago, playing FF7 on a 200Mhz machine... It was about 20FPS...

So yeah...

Although that might easily be confused for the Arkham Knight game... :P

Lmao, nah you can tell the difference I bet the textures were less blurry than AK launch.

*major facepalm*

What I really don't get are those PC gamers who say: "I don't need no stinking gamepad. Keyboard and mouse for life, yo!" Some games are just more fun when one doesn't have to do awkward finger acrobatics. ;)