I've been being perfectly patient...and willing to wait until time elapsed and the captain position got passed...and would have happily fluffed it up in the interim, as I had been...

but am more glad to have you propose a team though, so thanks!

I will go ahead and tell you all I already voted no. I am such a naysayer, aye?

The same exact team just limits us in sooo many ways for the depth of future reads, as far as it seems to me, anyway.

Plus, I'm not so happy with the captain's performance thus far (not just as captain), he is one of the few at this point who if on a mission I will decline because he seems to be one of the fishier people here.

errrm it looks like GOG ate my reply post

spies have been tampering with the electronics squelching information! nothing new I suppose

ehh, it went something like this:

Noop! Maybe just a noob, but I'm just trying to play it the best way that I think. It just so happens that I haven't liked the first 2 teams/proposals is all, I can assure you all, I'm not even inclined to block 1/10 of the possible permutations, this is just how it's gone.

You didn't really explain why you thought it was a good idea to choose the same team + add yourself. I can guess at a bunch of things, but that does me no good, I would have liked to hear something from you on the team/mission when you proposed it.

Did you really think people were going to give you feedback on your 3 considerations before you actually proposed a team?...it just seems a bit odd to me, but then I'm new and learning, *shrug.*

what a silly question anyway, like a spy would answer "oh yes, I am! you got me!"

Sorry. Had an important job interview yesterday and I was away for the majority of the time. I'm back and catching up. Thankfully there's not a lot to catch up to.

Hmmm, not sure if picking the yesterday team + the captain is wise. If agent or someone from yesterday's team is a spy is all it takes to get everyone else on the team land locked if the mission fails. Just a thought. Perhaps a bit more variety in this scenario would give us more possibilities in the future.

concurrence

I like this team proposal. I don't trust any of them though :D

The only thing I'm sure is at least one of them is clean. ;)

Sending my vote.

Can you elaborate? I don't quite follow.

You like it why/in what way?

Does that mean you are voting yes or no?

In mafia games, Lift has fooled me by pretending to be town. The above pings a similar concern.

I'm also not fond of agent requesting feedback prior to his team proposal.

Vote submitted.

More or less in line with the previous posters, so let's go with Brasas explanation of voting reasoning. Vote sent.

Noted. Agent played several Mafia games, but not sure I can point to a meta. You up to try a characterization? How decisive is he usually? :)

I think this team choice is very logical and I will be happy to see how y'all vote on it.
But I do not believe success is assured with it.

It kind of makes me wonder if we should have held off more on giving our opinions and seen what each person who was on the proposed mission team said about the proposal themselves.

Maybe next time?

Okay, but logical how/in what way?

...
There I go, thinking I've understood how to play the game. Damn it.

That's a good question, let me check something first.

@ JMich

;)

@ Dess

Yo baltic colleague, pretty sure you were shining green a while ago. Have you voted? :)

@ all

Anyone else saw our turtling colleague? You know... so the others don't think I'm lying or anything...