Posted May 17, 2016
A quick read of yogsPVG leaves me with a neutral to scum read.
CSPVG's post #360 states not trying to lurk this time around. Why specify this time I'm really trying??
He also makes a reply stating: I think that the likelihood of hitting a PR today is quite slim but, in limiting our pool of targets, by offing someone today we're also limiting the pool of picks for scum tonight. Now, this would not be a problem in a normal game but because we only have three strikes this game, it's obviously more of a problem.
It makes sense we'll unlikely hit a power role through lynching. But narrowing the pool of targets for scum to pick from doesn't make sense. And sounds like a very townish thing to postulate.
segue to yogsloth
The thing I'll focus on is the voting. Three votes cast out of 29 posts. Post #865 states how your vote will stay on RWarehall/a4plz. You then go on and change it twice.
Not vote worthy yet, but not obvitown either.
CSPVG's post #360 states not trying to lurk this time around. Why specify this time I'm really trying??
He also makes a reply stating: I think that the likelihood of hitting a PR today is quite slim but, in limiting our pool of targets, by offing someone today we're also limiting the pool of picks for scum tonight. Now, this would not be a problem in a normal game but because we only have three strikes this game, it's obviously more of a problem.
It makes sense we'll unlikely hit a power role through lynching. But narrowing the pool of targets for scum to pick from doesn't make sense. And sounds like a very townish thing to postulate.
segue to yogsloth
The thing I'll focus on is the voting. Three votes cast out of 29 posts. Post #865 states how your vote will stay on RWarehall/a4plz. You then go on and change it twice.
Not vote worthy yet, but not obvitown either.