Nice to know that if we don't agree with your reasoning it's anti town, what were we thinking trying to disagree with the man whom usually gets it wrong.

This comes from the person who has done more vote flopping in this game than anyone else by like 300x...
my vote is no more powerful than anyone else's, and I actually have reasons and a stance on my vote, clearly explained and quite reasonable, so, go pick on others whose votes are in useless places or who haven't given any good reasoning for where it is or done any persuasion about it.

...still catching up...

What a fun that was! If you are interested, my personal RVS play ended in post #80 by unvoting you and normal scum searching/valid lynch target proposals started by voting lotsofchickenwings.

That's what I said, and what if talk is ALL THAT IS HELPFUL because that is ALL THAT WE HAVE.

This is a mis-representation of my position. I'm not scared and fear is not driving my decision. It's called being cautious, considering the possibilities, analyzing all of the angles and basing my decision on a variety of reasons (one of the biggest having been that there had been no one I felt was deserving of the vote otherwise.)

I'm a fellow human being playing this game where we're all trying to have fun and I'm telling you all that it has not been fun for me to be the D1 lynch so often and to please take that into consideration. Whether such behavior is GENERALLY scummy or not is irrelevant in this specific instance because, it's how I feel currently and I was sharing such.


What is "this" ? and who is "we"? you and your scum-buddies? or are you speaking for every single person who is playing this game, and you *know* for fact that every one here knows I'm following yogs' tourney game? scum-slip I think...
how is it distracting? if it bothers you, don't look at it. If I get an overwhelming "we don't like that" response from the group, I'll refrain, but you seem to be the only one with an issue. Again, this simply pings me a bit as scummy. Oh look, someone else actually likes it. I recommend when you see my votecounts, you just skip the post, don't worry, I won't include anything other than vote-counts in those posts.

Because you don't like me talking about different potentialities/possibilities/how things might be? You want me to say for certain I know how it will be? When there's no way I could? Why? Because you're scum and talking about things is no good for scum?

This is so full of fallacy, I don't know where to begin. This exchange between you and trent reeks of scum-buddies talking to each other.



thanks, and I agree with practically everything you say here, which is why my vote isn't on dess or HSL even though they are near the top of my suspect list.

How do you feel about trent?

OH SHiT, 7 mins til deadline

Here, have this:

Unvote no-lynch
vote trentonlf

I understand. I am hesitant to give my "he's so town" reads in order to make the Night Kill target as difficult as possible.

Whatever the deadline I sense D1 will end with No-Lynch.

You are Voting No Lynch so I guess that means you are not pushing No Lynch.

Makes perfect sense.

*************

Now I see you've changed your vote to trentonlf.

I guess no one should dare accuse you of pushing for trentonlf's lynch.

What combos do we have so far? I mean, scum team is a team. They have to have something in common. Without much given thought I would say:

- a4plz and drealmer7 - for having expressed similar ideas about No-Lynch and a4plz liked something about drealmer7
- three happy new players - key word is *new*
- trentonlf and HypersomniacLive - drealmer7 proposed it, I personally could only insert "Hot Fuzz vibe" as possible warning given
- lurkers?

Any others?

ummm, I thought the deadline was 4pm, oops, 6pm, okay then!

here's the current (unless I missed something):

vote count / vote-count / votecount

1. HijacK - 1 - CSPVG (#6),/ trentonlf (#224, #289),
2. JMich - 1 - /Dessimu (#10, #12), /trentonlf (#18, #224), wyrm (#287)
3. flubbucket - 0 - /Dessimu (#38, #69), /drealmer7 (#226, #284)
4. HypersomniacLive - 0 -
5. Bookwyrm627 - 0 -
6. Dessimu - 1 - /cristigale (#32, #141), locw (#131),
7. CSPVG - 0 -
8. drealmer7 - 3 - /drealmer7 (#9, #67), /Dessimu (#12, #33), /bookwyrm (#20, #179), babark (#26),
/Dessimu (#69, 80), flub (#204), trentonlf (#289)
9. cristigale - 0 - /Dessimu (#33), /locw (#209, #275),
10. lotsofchickenwings - 0 - /HSL (#16, #177), /Dessimu (#80, #143), /flubbucket (#120, #128),
11. a4plz - 2 - dessimu (#281), locw (#338),
12. babark - 0 - /flubbucket (#128, #202), /dessimu (#143, #262), /HSL (#188, #349), /wyrm (#203, #287),
13. trentonlf - 1 - drealmer7 (#379),

NO LYNCH - 1 - a4plz(#, ) , /drealmer7 (#, #379)

not voting - JMich, , HijacK, cristigale

bump please

bump

Thanks
Dess, I don't find your "let's focus on these players only" suggestion to be a good one. It seems like scum trying to narrow the field on the lynch. Perhaps if we had 2 or 3 people at L-3 or L-2, but not with 1 person at L-4 and the next person at L-5 (if my votecount is accurate, please inform if not)

I wouldn't be surprised if the 3 votes on me were all scum, or 2/3, but certainly 1 of them has to be scum. If we are to narrow the scope I think it should be between me, trent, and flub. I know I'm town, so that leaves trent and flub. They've not commented on each other hardly at all other than prompts about why I am scummy (open to correction if I'm wrong, this is going from memory) for wanting no-lynch discussion.

Your vote count has at least one mistake: a4plz has 3 votes; cristigale is also voting him. But please, do not post an updated vote count for now. I believe agentcarr16 will show up soon and post his vote count.

What concerns focus on new players - hey, in MY first game, I turned out to be a rather capable scum. Now we have three new players. Chance that at least one of 'em is scum is rather good.

Focusing only on them is bad for sure. Whether you are townie or scum, you can see why people vote/may want to vote you either way.

I have a few more players in mind that give me suspicions, but there is so little to go on, that mentioning them will not prove useful.

did you fail to read my previous comment in RE: to HSL? if you don't like it, don't look at it, simple as that. I don't see how it is a distraction, it's fucking votecount. tell me why you find it distracting, someone has told me they like it, sooo, *shrug* I suggest you go watch that eagles vid I linked.

I'd be a fool to take your claim at face value, especially after you unnecessarily soft-claimed Vanilla when it was already discussed.


"This" is bringing over their lingo and abbreviations, and without even explaining them,when you've gone to great lengths to explain quite a bit for the new players.


I rest my case.


I have no problem with you discussing whatever you want. But you're contradicting yourself. In the first post of yours I quoted, you presented the odds as pretty low, but as soon as someone made a case against your take, it suddenly became a big fat threat of increased chance.


[emphasis added]

Are you referring to me with that "you"? Check again.


Try again.


They surely must be Town then, eh?

Seriously man, you're only content when others agree with you, and that's not how the game works.

*reply of how scummy and antagonistic I am incoming in 3... 2...*



You're obviously not a Hot Fuzz fan.


OK, with about 3hrs to go.

The new players are off the table because D1 and all that, but they're all on watch.

I'm willing to vote for
- Hijack: don't like his evasive and deflecting way in his latests posts.
- JMich: don't like that he wants to expose the Coroner and any results they get on Power-Roles.
- flubbucket: getting a scum vibe form his niceness, helpfulness, the way he made his case against drealmer7, and what appears a bit of buddying up to me. If he's Town, this will be the very first game he's playing this way without being Scum.
- cristigale: for all her good posting, she gives off a bit of a scum vibe, might just be me always suspecting her, but she does play a damn good scum game; has done a bit of piggy-backing; tried a bit too hard to justify her vote on a new player who, imho, is equally low hanging fruit, but only trentonlf is guilty of it; stated that there's bad in my posts but did not provide anything asides of aggressiveness.

The rest get a chance to see D2. That doesn't mean they're in the clear though.

Thoughts?


Let's hope the rest of the players show up before the deadline expires.