Posted December 12, 2019
Alright. I'm finally back home. Dedo has made his decision and I quite agree with it. I still think Joe has a good chance of being scum. If he's lone scum, this will end the game and if he is team-scum, we'll have to figure out who his buddy is tomorrow. But first we use what time we have left. Because placing the second vote on someone is, where the real danger of quicklynch starts. Then even one scum could quickhammer, without any coordination, if both dedo and I are wrong.
@RW and Pooka: what do you think. RW defended Joe and Joe defended Pooka. How do we proceed now?
But first I'll try to recreate the post that GOG ate when I tried to send it from my mobile.
@RW: you call for people not voting but posting and discussing their intents to vote. Did you miss, that that was exactly what we have been doing? dedo, I and even you have posted, that we see either Joe or Pooka as the best lynch. As long as we were talking theoretically and rating likely scumminess, Joe was one of your preferred targets. But that suddenly changed, when Joe became a real target because I put my vote on him. Then suddenly you called that vote, with which you should agree according to your previous rating, scummy and started to defend Joe. Did you get cold feet? Was it an attempt to deflect attention away from Joe?
@Joe: feeling smug because of me having been right and you having been wrong sounds tempting. But I'd rather not pay the price of letting scum win just to feel smug. Also, if you are scum, wouldn't you be the one who gets to feel smug if you make me vote the wrong person? I'd rather win AND feel smug about it! ;-)
But jokes aside: if you really are Town, I am quite convinced that your most disastrous scenario has to be true. If you aren't scum, then Pooka probably is. Together with RW. ... But my problem is, there is something off about that triangle of you, RW and Pooka. Why is RW kind of defending you while you vote for him? Well, he didn't word it as a defense, but he still asked me to retract my vote on you, which is in effect a defense.
So much to think about. Now I really want some input from RW, Pooka and from Joe.
@RW and Pooka: what do you think. RW defended Joe and Joe defended Pooka. How do we proceed now?
But first I'll try to recreate the post that GOG ate when I tried to send it from my mobile.
@RW: you call for people not voting but posting and discussing their intents to vote. Did you miss, that that was exactly what we have been doing? dedo, I and even you have posted, that we see either Joe or Pooka as the best lynch. As long as we were talking theoretically and rating likely scumminess, Joe was one of your preferred targets. But that suddenly changed, when Joe became a real target because I put my vote on him. Then suddenly you called that vote, with which you should agree according to your previous rating, scummy and started to defend Joe. Did you get cold feet? Was it an attempt to deflect attention away from Joe?
@Joe: feeling smug because of me having been right and you having been wrong sounds tempting. But I'd rather not pay the price of letting scum win just to feel smug. Also, if you are scum, wouldn't you be the one who gets to feel smug if you make me vote the wrong person? I'd rather win AND feel smug about it! ;-)
But jokes aside: if you really are Town, I am quite convinced that your most disastrous scenario has to be true. If you aren't scum, then Pooka probably is. Together with RW. ... But my problem is, there is something off about that triangle of you, RW and Pooka. Why is RW kind of defending you while you vote for him? Well, he didn't word it as a defense, but he still asked me to retract my vote on you, which is in effect a defense.
So much to think about. Now I really want some input from RW, Pooka and from Joe.