It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Krypsyn: Yep. I screwed it up again. I seem to always miss the vote number, yet get all the underlining correct.
Bad news. At least one of your vote counts (iirc one where Flub was at L-1) messed up the underlining as well. ;)

avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] Vote Mchack
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Is that because you (still?) think he's scum? Yes, I saw you unvoted him already, just want to make sure I follow you.
If he was scum on Day 1, then he's still scum Today. I see no reason to remove him from my list at this time.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] That was pretty much the absolute worst possible time for such conversation, and Trent Don't-Talk-About-Roles-On-Day-1 onlf decides it is a good time to claim.

And yeah, I'm moving my vote because that is still ridiculous.

Unvote Mchack
Vote Trent
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Your reasoning isn't clear to me - are you voting him because of what he did yesterday (as town? as scum?), or because he believed his claim and think that he's likely scum now?
He effectively claimed he wasn't a mason. LAL makes that an excessively deadly proposition if he is a mason. Also, Trent is typically very adamantly against D1 claims without cause. Therefore, I'm inclined to believe he was either vanilla town, or he was scum. Scum can easily come to this same conclusion, which makes him a likely recruit if he is town, and recruiting would make him scum anyway. Either way, he needs to die.

Combine Trent's SOP of decrying early game role claims, that he is familiar with our cultural fondness for LAL, that the claim came at a terrible time in the Day, and the claim becomes incredibly irksome (for me, at least) on so many levels.

With Flub and Trent as very likely vanilla (assuming town), then I think randomly lynching from one of them yields (at least? pretty close to?) 50% of hitting scum.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: I'm not sure how much to read into it. As an example: Mchack wouldn't lynch himself. Hunter was already on the wagon. Sage was MIA for an extended period. That only leaves 1 other scum, who would have to be on the other scum team AND who wasn't already on the wagon. This makes some assumptions for the sake of the point, but I think it is a decent illustration.
avatar
dedoporno: I'm a bit tired and I'm not sure I follow this, I have to process it a bit but I actually neglected the fact about Sage not being there at all.
I'm saying I don't know how much credence I'd give to "he was sitting at L-1, so he is more likely to be town". In Mchack's case, there simply might not have been any scum available to slam the hammer down "just to achieve a lynch". For example, if Mchack is scum, then the two scum on the other team might have already been on his wagon (Hunter) and/or might have been missing (Sage). Hunter and Sage are used as behavior examples here, not as accusations.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: ~ the idea of one scum team doing nothing on N1 is ridiculous enough that I categorically regret it. ~
avatar
dedoporno: [emphasis by me] Is that supposed to be "reject" or do you regret doing nothing on N1?
That is an embarrassing typo that will lead to my proofreading team being reprimanded and possibly replaced. Should have been "reject".

avatar
mchack: secondly: I think this exonerates no-one. He was scum but aside from that (and even that if you believe bookwyrms first case) we cannot know who his buddy was, because wifom.
This reminds me of something.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: A1) If Adalia or HSL were scum and on Hunter's team, then there isn't much reason for Hunter to use his conversion shot instead of one of them because Hunter wasn't at risk of lynch.
avatar
mchack: said it before, but I'll say it again: A1 is exactly the opposite in my assessment of the situation. Exactly because they were so near a lynch as they were, them flipping scum would cast a bad light on a lot of people (even enemies of enemies) , whereas hunter flipping doesn't, so for me it is pretty safe to assume neither hsl nor adalia would risk to flip themselves and rather leave the conversion attempt to hunter.
Apparently this is a case where we just differ in philosophy.

That said, if Adalia/HSL flipping scum would cast a bad light on a lot of people, why wouldn't they risk their death on the conversion attempt? Sounds like a win-win; either they get a convert or a bunch of other people look bad.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: A1) If Adalia or HSL were scum and on Hunter's team, then there isn't much reason for Hunter to use his conversion shot instead of one of them because Hunter wasn't at risk of lynch.
avatar
mchack: said it before, but I'll say it again: A1 is exactly the opposite in my assessment of the situation. Exactly because they were so near a lynch as they were, them flipping scum would cast a bad light on a lot of people (even enemies of enemies) , whereas hunter flipping doesn't, so for me it is pretty safe to assume neither hsl nor adalia would risk to flip themselves and rather leave the conversion attempt to hunter.
I still don't see it. Say adalia is scum and Hunter's partner. Why would he worry that flip-revealing himself puts HSL in bad light. He's Hunter's partner and not HSL's.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: A1) If Adalia or HSL were scum and on Hunter's team, then there isn't much reason for Hunter to use his conversion shot instead of one of them because Hunter wasn't at risk of lynch.
avatar
mchack: said it before, but I'll say it again: A1 is exactly the opposite in my assessment of the situation. Exactly because they were so near a lynch as they were, them flipping scum would cast a bad light on a lot of people (even enemies of enemies) , whereas hunter flipping doesn't, so for me it is pretty safe to assume neither hsl nor adalia would risk to flip themselves and rather leave the conversion attempt to hunter.
Are we even playing the same game?
Casting a bad light on people is exactly what scum want to do. And who exactly would me flipping scum place in a bad light?
The few players who called me town day 1?
If I was scum only one of them could be my buddy so at worst it would make three townies and my possible buddy look a little worse.
Same for Hyper. And if you assume Hunter was one of our buddies the actually dying and flipping scum would have kept the attention completely away from him and on the circle of players who refused to vote either of us. How would that be an undesirable outcome for scum?

It feels like your just pulling arguments out your arse now...
avatar
dedoporno: @flub, do you still think you're supposed to be lynched?
I'd have been a better lynch Day One. However I'm still a safe lynch now. Not the best lynch but a safe one.

At this juncture I'd rather lynch scum.

For the record I wasn't recruited, which has been alluded to by others as an unwise move by scum. My recruitment would be a poor choice since I will soon be a policy lynch if not today then tomorrow.


avatar
Bookwyrm627: .............

With Flub and Trent as very likely vanilla (assuming town), then I think randomly lynching from one of them yields (at least? pretty close to?) 50% of hitting scum.

..............
So "statistically" either trentonlf or flubbucket are scum.













...........................................really
avatar
Bookwyrm627: For example, if Mchack is scum, then the two scum on the other team might have already been on his wagon (Hunter) and/or might have been missing (Sage). Hunter and Sage are used as behavior examples here, not as accusations.
OK, that makes some sense. I'll consider it some more. I'm also considering flub and trent as one being a possible recruit, although I'd prefer to hit OG to take out a conversion (unless Hunter was NKed in which case his buddy may have been the convertor and the conversion may already spent, but since there is no way of telling, there is also no point in trying).


avatar
flubbucket: At this juncture I'd rather lynch scum.
Of course.

avatar
flubbucket: For the record I wasn't recruited, which has been alluded to by others as an unwise move by scum. My recruitment would be a poor choice since I will soon be a policy lynch if not today then tomorrow.
Does that mean trent is scum now? Or would you say scum got too lucky?
avatar
dedoporno: ..............
Does that mean trent is scum now? Or would you say scum got too lucky?
Bullshit question.
avatar
flubbucket: Bullshit question.
That's not an answer :)
avatar
flubbucket: So "statistically" either trentonlf or flubbucket are scum.

...........................................really
*shrug* As you know, statistics never lie.
avatar
flubbucket: Bullshit question.
avatar
dedoporno: That's not an answer :)
Ask a proper question, bitch.
avatar
flubbucket: So "statistically" either trentonlf or flubbucket are scum.

...........................................really
avatar
Bookwyrm627: *shrug* As you know, statistics never lie.
Figures lie and liars figure.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: *shrug* As you know, statistics never lie.
Lie, no. Twisted to say whatever you want, absolutely. The only one who would want to twist anything to achieve a lynch is scum.

Unvote HSL
Vote Bookwyrm
I can get on board with that.

Unvote: adelieaovbookevooks

Vote: Bookwyrmyrm627
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Bad news. At least one of your vote counts (iirc one where Flub was at L-1) messed up the underlining as well. ;)
Yes, it was a typo'd bracket (wrong direction) on the underline tags. I did notice, just didn't comment on it. It was the one I posted when I voted to put flubbucket at L-1 (post 469). Amusingly, it was Hunter65536's vote I screwed up.

Not having edit really makes it hard to hide my tallying inadequacies.
Unofficial Vote Count
(halfway down the 50-post page, and probably has some stupid error in it)
(I triple-checked it, but I did just get back from bar-hopping...)

flubbucket - 2 Votes (ZFR 705; Krypsyn 739)

Bookwyrm627 - 2 Votes (trentonlf 776, flubbucket/ 777)

trentonlf - 1 Votes (Bookwyrm627 708; adaliabooks 717/723)

dedoporno - 0 Votes

adaliabooks - 1 Votes (flubbucket 712/777; mchack 714)

Krypsyn - 0 Votes

ZFR - 0 Votes

Leonard03 - 0 Votes (adaliabooks 723/748)

mchack - 1 Votes (Bookwyrm627 696/708; mchack 748)

Sage103082 - 0 Votes

HypersomniacLive - 0 Votes (trentonlf 702/776)

Not Voting - 4 abstentions (dedoporno; Leonard03; Sage103082; HypersomniacLive)
Yep.

Well, actually, nope. There were two errors. I fudged up two closing tags for underlining, so it underlined the entire thing (practically).

Screw you guys, I am going to bed. (read in the voice of Eric Cartman)