I will not double post again!
mchack: nope, the recruiter dies. see the setup.
Bookwyrm627: Scum is dead, whether the recruiter or the recruited dies.
I know. it's only HSL said "Except that it's going to be one dead scum that didn't exist the Day before." which is simply not true. so I pointed it out.
mchack: @flubs, @bookwyrm: Did either of you play against your own win condition last game, in the hopes of acquiring other win conditions someday and to not hurt those?
Bookwyrm627: I always played for my win condition.
I knew it. Going against your win condition is breaking the game. Thank you for being earnest.
Flubs also said so, btw. (
kinda )
You reading that adalia? not cool suggesting that flubs does it now or will tomorrow.
#489 #460 #458 #453 mchack: yes it does. it removes one conversion from the game forever. Only four conversions can happen this game. With adalia dead, it's only 3
Bookwyrm627: While yes, lynching scum does prevent that particular scum from converting someone, lynching a scum doesn't prevent all the other scum from converting someone. Conversions can happen until all the original scum are dead, all the vanilla are dead, or all the shots are used.
yep. so which will faster deplete by lynch alone (and should be our target for lynch when we want to fight conversions) original scum or vanilla?
Bookwyrm627: Your statement was too broad. Adalia has stated a desire to preserve the masons, even happily sacrificing vanilla townies in an effort to achieve that end. He has not advocated for the indiscriminate slaughter of townies.
true, only indiscriminate slaughter of vanillas (thereby also helping to reveal the masons in the long run, btw) See
here for instance:
excerpt: (yes I know. let me have some fun. view full post with link above)
adaliabooks: ...Particularly if three vanilla townies are dead...
... We will only ever lynch vanilla town.
Hence we should do so as quickly as possible ...
ZFR almost had it right when he suggested no lynch, but the better result for town tomorrow is to have less vanillas floating about muddying the water.
mchack: *emphasis added*
it is in the gamesetup. My premise is: scum can read. nothing has changed by that comment.
Bookwyrm627: Scum are people. People forget, especially when something hasn't been read for a week or more. You've reminded them of that particular outcome during a time frame and in a context where they'll have started thinking ahead about their night actions.
And over time you'll learn that not all of our players read the rules and think about the permutations. ;)
sure, but scum will reread the rules and ask the mod for clarifications if unclear in their night-chat before they'll put down their night action. that is for sure. I've been scum once you know. I know the drill.
mchack: lol, ok good you're enforcing your seat in my scumreadlist #3. How is it that flub needs to die now, that you realized he can trip up scum?
Bookwyrm627: It is the other way around: Flub needs to die now that you've explicitly pointed out some other possibilities, helping them NOT trip over those possibilities.
and how is it he has to die now, because scum might not actually try and convert him? Why don't you want to lynch scum instead?
----
Bookwyrm627: He could be straight up scum making a very similar play to last game, though I think it is somewhat more likely that he is town vanilla doing what he thinks must be done.
so more likely town for you? just wanna make sure (gotta scumreadlist to take care of you know ;) you are still voting him I also notice
Bookwyrm627: Flub has put himself in a position where town needs him to die at some point (unless he somehow isn't converted and we magically keep hitting scum until the game ends).
most everyone may need to die at some point. Why do you want flub dead now?
mchack: where did I say that scum will be able to pick which kind of target they're going to hit?
reread #319 and it's certainly not in there...
Bookwyrm627: Where did I say that you said that scum will be able to pick which kind of target they're going to hit? :P
I quoted you saying it... oh, we're on this level of detail now? ok, you said my post highlighted a trend in me and others that scum will be able to pick .... which it didn't :P
Bookwyrm627: My point is that some of your arguments throw around ideas like "and then scum convert two town vanilla on N1!" as support, when the odds of such happening (especially if we lynch one of those town vanilla today) look pretty slim. If it is any comfort, you aren't the only one doing something like this.
well, I don't. I usually reply to others and in doing so battle their points or assumptions and only in those cases have I used the same hypothetical circumstances with another outcome or outlook on the situation.
I don't know what scum will do, and I sure hope scum will have a hard time deciding. Thats why I don't want to remove options from them, that can trip them up. like flub.
----
adaliabooks: I'm here, but drunk and very tired so I wouldn't expect much sense (or anything from me).
....
If you'd been paying attention and reading other peoples posts rather than just sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "SCUM!" over and over again you'd know that I said providing scum reads was a bad idea, so I'm not about to.
yes yes, love you, too. Good night and all that. anyway I did notice. But does that mean you simply don't think, it helps finding converted players to pin them on their scumreads from the day before? What is your suggestion on finding the converted players, if any, tomorrow? ...lynch flub?
adaliabooks: Despite claiming to have a fair idea who the vanilla townies are... which by process of elimination should give you an idea who the other remaining scum would be.
I'm not claiming that I have a fair Idea who _the_ vanilla townies are. never have. I simply have more people than only flubs, that I think is vanilla. Won't tell you how many, won't say anything more about it. only saying flubs is _not_ the only and _not_ a safe choice for conversion. So he is _not_ the one we have to lynch today.