trentonlf: To me casting shade on someone is a way to subtitly build up a negative image of the person you are casting shade on so that it’s easier to accuse that person later of being scum when they are not but it is more believable because of the negative image. I find casting shade (whether it’s on me or someone else) to be vote worthy, and as I did the only reason my vote is still not on Lift is because I find dedo to be the more likely option as the CL. [...]
HypersomniacLive: Except that if the other party is also a townie, they can't know for certain that you're a townie (on D1 of all Days), so it's not necessarily casting shade with the purpose you describe. I'd understand it if you'd been suspicious of Lifthrasil before, i.e. you had reasons to think him scum, hence this act was more likely to come from a scum mindset for you (and why I asked you of other possible reasons), but by your own admission, this is the only reason he qualifies as likely being the CL.
Putting it another way - if this is the only reason you suspect him, what makes you so sure he's not a misguided townie?
trentonlf: [...] I also hope I don’t ever stoop to placing OMGUS votes, I try not to play that way. If I vote someone it’s for a reason and OMGUS is not a good reason.
HypersomniacLive: Oh come on, don't take it so personal; you've done plenty of voting as scum for no (real) good reason, and I'm sure you're going to do it again.
Lifthrasil: [...] Third point: what I don't understand is: flubb is aware of the problem his usual playstyle creates in the specific setting of a cult game. But he decides not to change his problematic style but rather suggests to lynch him. That's what I actually don't understand. Irrespective of faction that he might have. [...]
HypersomniacLive: If he did change his D1 play, and became helpful (mchack thinks he's been plenty helpful), would you still think of him as townie as you do now? If he had made some play that indicated he doesn't want to be lynched (not that I think that he actually wants to be lynched now that he suggested it), would you brush it off the way you did his request to be lynched? Given how he's been playing recently, which play would increase his chances as CL to survive D1?
dedoporno: [...] What do you mean what's the purpose? To see what he'll respond like. He mentioned that the CL would probably try to get a bothersome townie out of his way for free during the day, so I wanted to see what his choices would be and the reasoning behind them and then see how that aligns with his play and pushes. Or maybe it's the exact opposite. Or something entirely different. Things that may uncover a pattern.
The second point of who Hijack listed and what he did isn't something I remember or looked for honestly, but I don't see why that should be a reason not to ask if I'm interested in the response. [...]
HypersomniacLive: Thanks for answering.
My point with the bit about HijacK was - how much can you trust the response?
dedoporno: [...] The one where you were scum of your own? Sure. [...]
HypersomniacLive: Please, I was Edward Tomas Bell, town's good little JOAT Peace Officer.
dedoporno: [...] I always try to respond to you if I see that there is something left to be clarified. What I don't like it iterating over the same stuff, but so far I don't think we have done that here (well, a bit with Trent :)). [...]
HypersomniacLive: The difference being that you and I may not see what still needs to be clarified in the same way, more so when as town (or lonesome third party) I have no way of knowing if you're being sincere or just trying to get rid of me because you feel cornered. This applies even more to reiterating things - when I insist it's because something in your initial response doesn't sit well with me, or seems/is contradictory, so reiterating the same stuff again and again isn't what I'm looking for, nor is it going to get me off your back.
And thanks for the wishes, appreciated.
I wasn’t taking it personal I assure you, but I’m not scum so my reasons for voting are very good ones too me ;-)