Okay then, not a posting restriction I see.

The Greater Good.

Jmich underlined it; so did I. /shrug

I would have been penalized when the game started after bookwyrm started a roll call if there was going to be a posting restriction for not saying "The Greater Good" as would you, Sage, and dedo. I've only posted that once, and that was just for the hell of it.

The Greater Good

What try?



Not reading, eh?



If you're referring to Bookwyrm627's post #6, that wasn't an actual roll call.

Are you also not reading, trentonlf?

HSL beat me to it but yeah bookwyrm didn’t do the underline thingy which made it not a roll call.

I didn't think the underline mattered, but I also don't think the whole roll call thing matters either and is just a distraction.

Thе Grеаter Gооd.

This.

JMich stated qutie clearly after the pseudo roll call that it does matter and the original one didn't count. Hence why Wyrm was able to start a second one (officially it was his first, though).

Are actively trying to make your actions invalid?

This all becomes WIFOM.

If I'm cult I can still type The Greater Good.

If someone forgets it doesn't make them cult and if they remember it doesn't make them town/NWA

This is absolutely correct. I don't know if it's exactly WIFOM, but I agree that anyone can probably do anything around the phrase for various reasons and we still might not know what that means. My point was that the mod himself stated that the roll call initiation is supposed to be underlined to count as such, regardless of what potential effects that might have.


On a side note, tomorrow is a national holiday here and we'll extend the already long weekend with the following Monday for a trip to the seaside. I believe I'll have connectivity during the stay but tomorrow and on Monday we'll be travelling so I may not be as available.

@JMich, if you can disclose this information - will there be a deadline around that period that I need to account for?

Nah. It was just banter. ... Is it just me or did we have this conversation in a previous game too?

To your other points: yes, Bookwyrm doing his stupid soft-claiming thing is quite usual too. Which is why as a CL it would be good play for him to use it to throw a 'don't lynch me yet' soft claim out there. Doesn't mean that he has to be the CL. But it, combined with the weakly motivated vote, makes him look suspicious.
As to your other, mostly rhetoric questions: I think we have just established that it isn't a posting restriction. So no need to argue about it any more.

@flubb: yes, that was the phrase I was looking for. Thank you!

That is interesting. JMich quite clearly stated that the underlining was what made it a roll-call. (post 21) Are you not reading what our mod posts? I mean, I can understand just skimming what other players write. Especially if they are very wordy. But not reading clarifications from the mod is a bit strange.

I didn't ask the question about what determines how a roll call has ended, Hyper did in post 131.

As for JMich's post 21 I remember it now, but I honestly forgot about it until it was pointed out by Lift in post 145, and no I was not just skimming posts I just forgot because it didn't stand out as important.

If you think voting for Sage or Trent based on them underlining The Greater Good during a roll call is a good idea, then you go right ahead and officially vote for them.

This question feels exceptionally spurious, and I do expect better from you, Dedo.

That's wierd. I think I have messed some quote up as this was supposed to be a +1 on HSL's remark. It wasn't directed towards you in any way. Sorry about that.


If I thought that was a good idea I would have done so. That's the thing - I'm not the one placing invalid votes on people who, based on the ruleset, "indicate they are the CL". And this is the second time you do something not in the way it's supposed to be done. Hence why I asked if it's on purpose.

Sorry to be a disppointment, I'll try harder from now on.

Ooooh, snap!

[Snap! - The Power]